When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The Nagorno-Karabakh Debacle: Bad News For Putin Or Set Up For A Coup In Armenia?

It's been a whirlwind 24 hours in the Armenian enclave, whose sudden surrender is reshaping the power dynamics in the volatile Caucasus region, leaving lingering questions about the future of a region long under the Russian sphere of influence.

Low-angle shot of three police officers standing in front of the Armenian Government Building in Yerevan on Sept. 19

Police officers stand in front of the Armenian Government Building in Yerevan on Sept. 19

Pierre Haski


It happened quickly, much faster than anyone could have imagined. It took the Azerbaijani army just 24 hours to force the Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh to surrender. The fighting, which claimed about 100 lives, ended Wednesday when the leaders of the breakaway region accepted Baku's conditions.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Thus ends the self-proclaimed "Republic of Artsakh" — the name that the separatists gave to Nagorno-Karabakh.

How can we explain such a speedy defeat, given that this crisis has been going on for nearly three decades and has already triggered two high-intensity wars, in 1994 and 2020? The answer is simple: the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh backed themselves into a corner.

Armenia v. Russia

Two major actors in this geopolitical and humanitarian tragedy played a key role in this defeat: the Republic of Armenia and Russia. From the beginning of the fighting, Armenia made it clear that it would not intervene, sealing the fate of Nagorno-Karabakh.

A sign of Moscow's diminishing influence in the Caucasus region.

Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan knew that coming to the rescue of the Armenians at the helm of the enclave meant risking war spilling onto its own territory — a war waged by the Azerbaijani army, much more powerful than Armenian forces. To save Armenia, he therefore had to sacrifice Nagorno-Karabakh.

As for Russia, it remained passive, whether as a result of strategic calculation or because it is otherwise occupied on the Ukraine front. This can be seen as a sign of Moscow's diminishing influence in the Caucasus region, where other powers like Turkey (a vocal supporter of Azerbaijan) are asserting themselves.

Moscow's hostility toward Armenia

Russia has a military base in Armenia, and about 2,000 troops deployed in the Nagorno-Karabakh area under a previous peace agreement. These troops did not intervene, not even as peacekeepers, but they still facilitated yesterday's ceasefire, leading to the de facto surrender of the separatist enclave.

The Kremlin's actions are also undoubtedly influenced by its strong hostility toward Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan, who came to power in 2018 in the wake of one of those "color revolutions" that Vladimir Putin despises so much. The liberal Pashinyan developed friendly relationships with Western countries and is viewed very unfavorably in Moscow.

Yesterday, the head of the Russian propaganda channel RT, Margaret Simonyan, stated that Russia owed nothing to Armenia and reused an insult that had be thrown at Nikol Pashinyan, calling him a "bald Judas."

Photo of Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Yerevan on July 25, 2023.

Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Yerevan on July 25, 2023.

Alexander Patrin/TASS/ZUMA

The specter of ethnic cleansing

The full meaning of the Azerbaijani victory remains to be seen. A new era begins Thursday as negotiations open between the government in Stepanakert and Baku representatives.

A coup is not out of the question.

On the agenda: the disarmament of the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave, as well as its reintegration into Azerbaijan. Under what conditions, with what future for its Armenian population, and with what guarantees? These are weighty questions, with the looming specter of ethnic cleansing.

But there may be more geopolitical changes ahead. Pashinyan's hold on power in Yerevan is not a given, as he faces the anger of a portion of the public pronged by pro-Moscow networks. A coup cannot be ruled out.

Last but not least, Russia's influence in the region is being challenged in this new balance of power imposed by the Azerbaijani army. These 24 hours of fighting have indeed significantly reshuffled the cards in the Caucasus.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


A Reminder For Israel And Ukraine: Negotiating With Terrorists Never Works

As long as there are criminal regimes with technological, military, and financial capabilities, defeating them militarily is the only route to lasting peace.

Man aiming a weapon at the camera with similarly dressed men surrounding him

Members of the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian Hamas movement display weapons in Maghazi, Gaza on July 19, 2023.

Leonid Nevzlin


KYIV — The conflict in Israel that began after Hamas launched a major terrorist attack on Israeli soil on October 7 offers striking parallels with the situation in Ukraine. It is not directly comparable to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russian troops, but both conflicts were preceded by similar developments.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest