When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

What Lula Needs Now To Win: Move To The Center And Mea Culpa

Despite the leftist candidate's first-place finish, the voter mood in Brazil's presidential campaign is clearly conservative. So Lula will have to move clearly to the political center to vanquish the divisive but still popular Jair Bolsonaro. He also needs to send a message of contrition to skeptical voters about past mistakes.

Photo of a fabric banner with presidential candidate Lula's face in a street of Sao Paulo

Brazilian votes show a polarized national opinion with two clear winners: former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and sitting president Jair Bolsonaro

Marcelo Cantelmi

-Analysis-

The first round of Brazil's presidential elections closed with two winners, a novelty but not necessarily a political surprise.

Leftist candidate and former president, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, was clearly the winner. His victory came on the back of the successes of his two previous administrations (2003-2011), kept alive today by the harsh reality that large swathes of Brazilians see no real future for themselves.

Lula, the head of the Workers Party or PT, also moved a tad toward the political Center in a bid to seduce middle-class voters, with some success. Another factor in his first-round success was a decisive vote cast against the current government, though this was less considerable than anticipated.

The other big winner of the day was the sitting president, Jair Bolsonaro. For many voters, his defects turn out to be virtues. They were little concerned by his bombastic declarations, his authoritarian bent, contempt for modernity, his retrograde views on gender and his painful management of the pandemic. They do not believe in Lula, and envisage no other alternative.


The PT candidate garnered 48% of all votes cast, and the president a little more than 43%. Even if he came in second, Bolsonaro also came close to convincing half the electorate. All he had needed to win were those votes cast for Lula in protest.

Dubbed the "Tropical Trump," the Brazilian president was showing signs of political resilience even in recent polls that showed him trailing behind Lula with a mere 37% of intended votes. Clearly, even if he lost, Bolsonaro had the necessary elements to make him a buoyant opposition leader. This position will become markedly clearer after the run-off to be held on October 30, when the two candidates will battle over the few votes that went to other candidates.

This tie-break situation is in fact an indicator of the socio-political direction Brazilian society has chosen.

Ideological Necrophilia

Center-right senator Simone Tebet came in third, ahead of the social-democratic Ciro Gomes. The range of the top three is notable: one leftist ex-leader moving to the Center and winning by four points; a conservative president sticking to his radical views; and a conservative stick to his conservative views, but with a more polished profile.

Taken together, it expresses what Brazilians are expecting from power. This is not specific to South America's largest country, but is a regional trend as was seen in Chile, with electors voting down a proposed, radically progressive new constitution. Much the same could be said of our country, Argentina. There is a message here to be considered.

It is about the end of what one perceptive analyst called "ideological necrophilia." This was a reference to the dead ideas to which so many mainstream politicians are still clinging.

Bolsonaro may be tempted to repeat the Trumpist ploy.

Lula has always been a pragmatist. We need only remember his proximity and comprehensive attitude to then U.S. President George W. Bush - considered a hyper-conservative before Donald Trump appeared - when other regional presidents like Néstor Kirchner or Hugo Chávez publicly repudiated him. Lula may have sensed the public mood this time, but should have made it clearer. He will have to do that ahead of the second round.

A Lula supporter wearing a red cap and PT scarf looks at her smartphone

Will Lula's pragmatism help him convince the few voters he needs to be elected?

Ivan Abreu/SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire

Waiting for the Mea Culpa

One of the obstacles to his victory so far and a grave failing of this political veteran, is his failure to utter a mea culpa over the massive corruption that marked his latter years as president. People were expecting it. That, alongside a recession, became a springboard for Bolsonaro's victory; so again, he may decide to acknowledge this before the next round.

Even before the elections, Bolsonaro and his antics were pointedly compared with the politics of the last U.S. president Donald Trump. They are indeed similar in their opinions, methods and indifference to established practices or manners.

The Bolsonaro team might even be tempted to repeat the Trumpist ploy of rejecting the results.

But clearly, unless he ditches the rogue methods, moderates his language and shows a measure of tolerance and maturity, he will be unable to beat Lula. Such a change of conduct seems implausible, if not impossible - and that is Lula's best hope.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Egypt's Overcrowded Christian Churches Are A Fire Risk — Building New Ones Is Risky Too

After a fire at a church in August killed 42 people, Egypt's Christians are worried about the fate of their places of worship, which lack proper infrastructure and financial support to meet safety standards. But, as Egypt's Mada Masr reports, this is not a new problem, and it is one that has been ongoing for years, during which Christians were not given permission to set up churches.

People stand outside the burned Virgin Mary church in the Imbaba neighborhood of Cairo back in 2011

Mohamed Abu Deif

GIZA — The St. Demiana Church is only distinguishable from surrounding buildings in the neighborhood of Imbaba, in northern Giza, by the crosses on its windows and the security kiosk and metal gate encircling its perimeter. Before prayers commence, the church is already packed to the brim, as hundreds of families fill the premises leaving almost no standing room.

As people pack in, the parish priest, Father Ghaios Bekhit, conducts a safety check around the premises. He checks on the state of the electric cables attached to the air conditioning units and ensures the functionality of the fire extinguishers.

His vigilance has been triggered by fear of a fire scenario repeating itself in his own parish, in the aftermath of the tragic fire that broke out just 4 kilometers away in the Martyr Philopateer St. Mercurius [Abu Sefein in Arabic] Church in Imbaba, during a morning mass, said to have been caused by an electric short-circuit in an air conditioning unit in the building. According to the Public Prosecution., 42 people were killed in the August 14 blaze, including 15 children.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ