When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

Liz Truss Is The Sorry Face Of Post-Brexit Britain

Liz Truss' record-setting short time in office showed that the UK cannot do whatever it pleases — even now that it's left the EU.

Photo of Liz Truss walking back inside 10 Downing Street after delivering her resignation speech on Oct. 20

Outgoing Prime Minister Liz Truss after delivering her resignation speech on Oct. 20 in front of 10 Downing Street

Etienne Lefebvre

-Analysis-

PARIS — The “next Margaret Thatcher” didn't stay in office very long. And in view of her radical project and personality, this is clearly no surprise — she actually had very little in common with the Iron Lady.

Liz Truss remained in 10 Downing Street for exactly 45 days, the shortest stint ever for a British prime minister. But this was already enough time to prove just how empty her economic program was.


But beyond the chaos that took place, her fall also indicates how quickly the illusion of Brexit is fading away. Before the referendum that took place in 2016, Boris Johnson promised his electors that they would be living in a country freed from its European chains — a country that would be emancipated, through deregulation, massive reduction in taxes, and finding new agreements with the rest of the world.

​​​"Global Britain" or "Singapore-on-Thames"​​​

Once in office, he had to find an agreement with … Brussels. And then started to question it. His “Global Britain” strategy also showed no real results. Admittedly, it’s also true that the pandemic and the global economic crisis that followed didn’t help things along.

And then, Liz Truss and her chosen Chancellor of the Exchequer, Kwasi Kwarteng, worked to put the “Singapore-on-Thames” project back in the spotlight.

One cannot do whatever one wants.

But the program was incredibly expensive and even the financial markets of the City rejected it. And for good reason: Singapore doesn’t have to deal with a budget deficit. And “Trussonomics” set off a veritable financial panic.

The Bank of England, investors and Parliament all reminded us of a few simple rules: One cannot do whatever one wants, even after exiting the EU. Actually, especially after leaving the EU.

The economic decline of the UK has started, and it will be hard to reverse, as inflation reaches 10%. With a prospect of recession, and high interest rates, both households and companies will be affected.

Oct. 21 front page of The Guardian. Check Worldcrunch's collection of international front pages marking Liz Truss's resignation here.

Five prime ministers within six years

Yet Brexit’s failure is even more brutally evident on a political scale. The Conservative Party has lost its compass and its credibility. It has descended into a jungle of treasons and score-settling. And we are now waiting for the nomination of a new prime minister — the fifth in six years.

Scottish are more and more attracted by independence, and Northern Islanders have an eye on Dublin’s stability: The UK is cracking. And the European Union has other things to worry about than providing support on all these matters.

The severity of this crisis has one upside: It’s shown that “the mother of parliaments” still has strong safety mechanisms in place — even if the future looks grim.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest