When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Israel

Israel And Germany, It's Complicated

Merkel and Netanyahu
Merkel and Netanyahu
Screenshot composite
Nico Fried

BERLIN - Benjamin Netanyahu tried to be a polite guest. That’s why, when he visited the Federal Chancellery, he was careful to play down his disappointment with Angela Merkel. But the Israeli Prime Minister only made it worse.

He said: "I think Chancellor Merkel was of the opinion that this vote would in some way foster peace. In fact the opposite is the case: after the UN vote, the Palestinian Authority under president Abbas is making plans to join with the terrorists of Hamas." From Netanyahu’s standpoint, then, Germany’s Middle East policy is well intentioned but seriously naive. That’s no compliment for Merkel.

The Chancellor’s policy with regard to Israel and the Palestinians has solid foundations. Now and again, however, what’s built on those foundations wobbles a little.

On the one hand, more than once Merkel has rightly said that after the Holocaust "the security of Israel is part of the "raison d'etre" of the Federal Republic of Germany." That’s why she made no judgment on Israel’s recent war on Hamas rockets. The Chancellor supports a two-state solution to solve the conflict with the Palestinians and makes no bones about the fact that Israel’s settlement policy does not serve this aim.

On the other hand, however, Merkel’s position as reflected by the German delegation at the UN General Assembly is not entirely on the mark, because in early 2011 she assured Netanyahu that Germany would not recognize a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state.

Observer status certainly isn’t the equivalent of statehood, but what Merkel was saying was that she didn’t believe that one-sided dealings on the part of the Palestinians would further the peace process. By this logic, the Germans should have voted "No" at the UN. So Netanyahu’s not entirely wrong in his disappointment.

However: if the laws of logic are to prevail in the Middle East conflict, so profoundly irrational in many ways -- then Netanyahu has the greater problem. With a vengeance he lets the building of settlements go ahead all the while claiming that they are only being built on land that, if peace is achieved, would belong to Israel anyway.

Germany’s “naiveté” in the UN vote doesn’t change much of anything; but Netanyahu’s “naiveté” on the subject of the settlements is a matter of difficult-to-undo fact.

Despite everything: the German-Israeli relationship remains a special one. To justify criticism of Israel, the argument is often used that among friends speaking openly is a proof of closeness. If that’s true, then it also holds true that Germany cannot, like many other Europeans, turn away when the frankness doesn’t have any effect. However difficult that may be.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Dnipro, A Heinous Attack Sparks Hard Questions About Weapon Supplies — On Both Sides

After Dnipro was left devastated by one of Russia’s deadliest attacks on Ukrainian civilians to date, the problem of arms delivery in a war that keeps escalating has never been more urgent.

Photo France's AMX-10 RC light tanks

France will be sending AMX-10 RC light tanks to Ukraine, but has not committed to heavy combat tanks.

Gouhier Nicolas/Abaca via ZUMA
Pierre Haski

The Russian missile that struck a residential building on Saturday afternoon in Dnipro killed at least 40 people, a number that keeps growing as bodies are discovered under the rubble in the central Ukrainian city. It appears to be a war crime with no legitimate target near the neighborhood.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

This bombing is also particularly informative about what’s happening right now on the Russian side of the war: The KH-22 cruise missile used is designed to sink an aircraft carrier, the biggest one in Moscow’s arsenal.

This precision missile was fired from an aircraft hundreds of miles away and has no link whatsoever to the target.

This enormous gap between the type of missile used and its ultimate target might actually reveal a missile scarcity in Russia, after weeks of continuous bombing in Ukraine. Tapping into strategic Russian weaponry (the KH-22 can be equipped with nuclear warheads) can never be justified considering the innocence of the target. Russian arms plants running at full capacity, for the time being at least, cannot keep up supplies.

But this tragic strike is also a clear sign of a progressive escalation in a war that, at this stage, shows no signs it can be stopped.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest