When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
Geopolitics

Sabotage, Desertions, Gamers? Why It's Getting Harder For Iran To Squash Protests

Faced with the resilience of the national protests, Iran's security forces are now facing unusual acts of sabotage on state installations, and clerical authorities have started to wonder which of their loyalist forces can be firmly relied on still to defend the regime.

Photo of protests in Iran

Screenshot of video

Kayhan-London

Ten weeks into the nationwide anti-state uprising in Iran, the regime's security agencies face a crisis driven by four key factors: 1. Losses among the ranks through disobedience, desertion or negligence on the streets; 2. insufficient forces because of casualties from clashes; 3. rising number of acts of subversion and sabotage, especially targeting strategic installations; 4. cyber-attacks and security traps laid from abroad.

At the same time, the Iranian regime is facing an apparent change of tactics among protesters compared to previous rounds of unrest, which is particular to the new generations involved in this movement. Senior officials of the Revolutionary Guards corps — the body effectively coordinating the repression — say the protesters are mostly aged between 15 and 25 years.

It is a kind of Gen-Z brigade working with older and experienced protesters who led previous rounds of protests in 2009, and especially 2017 and 2019 when public unrest reemerged with particular vigor.


This round is marked by greater experience, more "field" coordination against anti-riot forces, "neighborhood-based" activism and targeted acts of sabotage or symbolic vandalism.

Why is Iran blaming violence on gamers?

The regime's leaders have been left asking themselves how this time around, forceful repression and cutting off the Internet could have failed to snuff out the protests. Some have blamed computer games, which they want to see banned, saying numerous protesters are teenage gamers who, allegedly, practiced their street tactics before online..

The fact is repression is no longer working,

The regime is thus blaming computer games and the aggression they seem to generate, rather than its own incompetence, cruelty, people's dismal living conditions and their generalized hatred of an entire political setup, for the unrelenting unrest.

The fact is repression is no longer working, and desertions and dispersions among regime forces, especially those facing protesters, are far greater than officials want to admit. Sources claim an increase in cases of police officers and other security personnel failing, or refusing, to perform their duties, but also of aiding subversive actions.

Revolutionary Guards and rank-and-file

Senior officials are now less trusting of their rank-and-file forces, especially among the police. The more loyal Basij (Mobilization) militia, run by the Revolutionary Guards, lacks enough forces to quell protests if they persist, and dissent has been reported even among the families of the Basiji troops.

There are also reports of a deepening rift between the regime and families of "martyrs" and injured veterans of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq. The regime has lost its principal social support bases. The country's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is seeing fit to warn the armed forces about desertions, though the head of the regular land army (artesh), Abdulrahim Musavi, has sought to reassure loyalists by describing "unexpected desertions" as simply God's trial.

About 70 state agents are counted as killed since the protests erupted in mid-September — a significant loss for the state though nothing compared to the hundreds of ordinary Iranians the state has killed these past two-plus months.

While the head of the Armed Forces Judicial Organization, Ahmadreza Purkhaqan, insists "no harm will come to this state while the Basij stands," he has warned about "infiltrators" penetrating the leadership ranks. Obsessed with internal enemies and infiltrators, senior officials cannot understand that it is for the rank and file to decide whether they will stand with or against the people. Many have already chosen the people.

Photo of members of Iranian paramilitary volunteer forces during a meeting with Iranian Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Iranian supreme leader praises Basij forces

Iranian Supreme Leader'S Office/Zuma

Will reformists return to power in Iran?

Kayhan-London has also received information that the spreading acts of sabotage has gone beyond refineries and power stations to reach military bases. State industrial and mining firms have all boosted security measures for their premises and sought protection from the military.

In this context, Supreme Leader Khamenei advised a gathering of Basijis on November 26 to "maintain readiness" and "not to be taken by surprise." He's increasingly sounding like the head of a criminal gang who feels rivals are closing in on his operations.

Khamenei's stated concern with the integrity of loyalist forces are effectively an admission that their cohesion is damaged. He told his Basijis that some had advised him, in order to end the protests, to start talking to America. The suggestion may have come from the reformists, to whom the ruling clique has turned for advice or support after decades of thwarting them in politics.

These reformists, including individuals like former presidents Mohammad Khatami and Hasan Rouhani, may see this as an opportunity to return to front-line politics and "save" themselves and their Islamic Republic. It is all a very different tune than just a few days ago when Khamenei was confidently vowing the unrest would soon be "cleared up."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

North Korea And Nukes: Why The World Is Obliged To Try To Negotiate

How to handle a nuclear armed pariah state is not a simple question.

North Korea And Nukes: Why The World Is Obliged To Try To Negotiate

North Korea's missile launch during a news program at the Yongsan Railway Station in Seoul

Alexander Gillespie

The recent claim by Kim Jong Un that North Korea plans to develop the world’s most powerful nuclear force may well have been more bravado than credible threat. But that doesn’t mean it can be ignored.

The best guess is that North Korea now has sufficient fissile material to build 45 to 55 nuclear weapons, three decades after beginning its program. The warheads would mostly have yields of around 10 to 20 kilotons, similar to the 15 kiloton bomb that destroyed Hiroshima in 1945.

But North Korea has the capacity to make devices ten times bigger. Its missile delivery systems are also advancing in leaps and bounds. The technological advance is matched in rhetoric and increasingly reckless acts, including test-firing missiles over Japan in violation of all international norms, provoking terror and risking accidental war.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest

InterNations