When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

In Turkey, A 100-Mile Show Of Hands Against First Nuclear Plant

Activists say earthquake-prone Turkey risks a Fukushima-style disaster if plans go ahead to build the massive Akkuyu power plant along the Mediterranean coast.

Construction set to begin soon on a nuclear plan along Turkey's Mersin coast
Construction set to begin soon on a nuclear plan along Turkey's Mersin coast
Ali Şen, Mehmet Okur and A. Rıza Eren

MERSIN – Holding hands to form a 100-mile human chain, thousands of anti-nuclear activists gathered in southern Turkey over the weekend to protest plans to build the country's first nuclear power plant.

Construction on the Akkuyu facility is set to begin next month in Mersin. Opponents worry that the plant could be prone to the same kind of disaster that has hit the Fukushima plant following the March 11 earthquake in northern Japan

Sebahat Aslan, a spokeswoman for Mersin Against Nuclear Power, said that accidents in nuclear power plants like Chernobyl and Fukushima threaten the future of the entire planet. "We want to thank all our friends, joining us and echoing the call that Turkey will not be another Japan," Aslan said. "We are here today to warn the government again, and tell them that we don't want nuclear power plants. Those who want to make a nuclear dumpster out of our country and produce nuclear weapons here will not reach their goals."

Turkey is crisscrossed by fault lines that produce frequent – and at times powerful – earthquakes. In March 2010, a 6.1-magnitude temblor near the eastern city of Bingöl killed more than 50 people. Eleven years earlier, a pair of large earthquakes – measuring 7.6 and 7.2 – killed more than 20,000 people in northwestern Turkey.

Following the rally and speeches, activists held hands and formed the human chain along coastal roadways to the town of Gülnar, with pedestrians and drivers waving and honking in support.

Zafer Taşdemir says his prostate cancer and his wife's breast cancer was caused by exposure to radioactive rain after the Chernobyl nuclear accident. "We don't want such dangerous power in Akkuyu," he said at the protest. "Other people should not be exposed to cancer like my family was."

‘Don't Touch My Strawberries ‘

Also over the weekend, there was another protest against the building of a thermoelectric, fossil-fuel burning power station in Adana, a city in southern Anatolia, and a major agricultural and commercial center. Shouting slogans such as "We don't want poisonous chimneys," the villagers said the power station would endanger the area's agricultural production.

Residents in Bartın also protested against a planned thermoelectric station in the region, driving a 75-vehicle caravan from Bartın to Amasra in northern Anatolia to raise awareness of an even bigger demonstration planned for April 22. Association members carried signs saying "Don't touch my strawberries," "No to the thermal power station" and "Go away poison traders." The mayor of Amasra, Emin Timur, declared: "Amasra is too precious to be sacrificed to greed and irresponsibility."

Turkey currently generates about 80% of its electricity with thermoelectric plants. Its other principal power source are hydroelectric dams. The $20 billion nuclear plant planned for Mersin, on Turkey's Mediterranean coast, could eventually have an installed capacity of 5,000 megawatts (MW), equivalent to approximately 9% of the country's total generating capacity.

Photo - alanlpriest

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Bibi Blinked: How The Ceasefire Deal Could Flip Israel's Whole Gaza War Logic

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pushed ahead a deal negotiated via Qatar, for a four-day truce and an exchange of 50 hostages for 150 Palestinian prisoners. Though the humanitarian and political pressure was mounting, Israel's all-out assault is suddenly halted, with unforeseen consequences for the future.

photo of someone holding a poster of a hostage

Families of Israeli hostages rally in Jerusalem

Nir Alon/ZUMA
Pierre Haski

Updated Nov. 22, 2023 at 8:55 p.m.


PARIS — It's the first piece of good news in 46 days of war. In the early hours of Wednesday, Israel agreed to a deal that included a four-day ceasefire and the release of some of the hostages held by Hamas — 30 children and 20 women — in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners, again women and children. The real question is what happens next.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

But first, this agreement, negotiated through the intermediary of Qatar, whose role is essential in this phase, must be implemented right away. This is a complex negotiation, because unlike the previous hostage-for-prisoner exchanges, it is taking place in the midst of a major war.

On the Palestinian side, although Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh is present in Doha, he does not make the decision alone — he must have the agreement of the leaders of the military wing, who are hiding somewhere in Gaza. It takes 24 hours to send a message back and forth. As you can imagine, it's not as simple as a phone call.

And on the Israeli side, a consensus had to be built around the agreement. Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right allies were opposed to the deal — in line with their eradication logic — even at the cost of Israeli lives. But the opposition of these discredited parties was ignored, and that will leave its mark.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest