When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Turkey

How The West’s Sudden Love Affair With Erdoğan Looks In Turkey

Analysis: Just a year ago, Prime Minister Erdo?an was viewed in many Western capitals with deep suspicion, accused of pushing Turkey towards an Islamic republic. Though basic positions haven't changed, five specific Erdo?an actions have helped cr

Erdo?an (office of the Greek prime minister)
Erdo?an (office of the Greek prime minister)
Mehmet Ali Birand

ISTANBUL - Our prime minister has suddenly reached elevated status in Western capitals. Not so long ago, the same voices were accusing Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of changing Turkey's orientation, of aspiring to establish an Islamic Republic. Now they are applauding him. Why? What happened to turn the tides so dramatically?

What we have been witnessing over the past few months is nothing short of incredible.

Prime Minister Erdoğan is now being showered with accolades, most recently gracing the cover of TIME magazine. Whichever Western newspaper you open, it seems, there is an article praising him. We were used to praise coming from the streets of the Middle East, but this time is different. Relations between Washington and Ankara are at an all-time high: President Obama is on the phone with Erdoğan all the time.

Cast your mind back to last year. The same Erdoğan faced a barrage of criticism by Western sources and was viewed with deep suspicion – you remember those days, right? The Prime Minister was accused of steering the country away from secularism, and towards an Islamic republic, harboring Ottoman ambitions, idolizing Iran and being an enemy of Israel. So what happened? Why has the West made such a U-turn? There are five central reasons. Let's take a look.

Erdoğan's 5 decisions that changed everything

A few crucial decisions by the prime minister are what created this radical change. Nothing in Erdoğan's approach has changed vis-à-vis the subjects for which he was criticized: instead, it is the viewpoint of the West that has changed. His Israel policy is the same, as is his approach to Iran. If anything, in recent months he has stepped up criticism of the West. He has delivered speeches accusing Western countries of not caring about people and acting based solely on oil interests.

Western capitals, and Washington in particular, have chosen to evaluate Erdoğan based not on his rhetoric but his concrete decisions.

These 5 steps by Erdoğan changed Western attitudes:

1. On Libya; after initial hesitation, Erdoğan later came on board with the West.

2. He approved the deployment of a NATO missile shield to central Turkey that the US has developed to line up against Iran. This decision was seen as important and clear proof of whose side Ankara is on in the US-Iranian standoff.

3. In Syria, he is playing a leading role in the campaign against Assad's regime, and has become a significant pressure point.

4. His foreign policy respects Iraq's territorial integrity while also countering Iran, which is seen as proof that Turkey will be a balancing power in the region after the US pull-out.

5. In Cairo, his remarks on a TV show that Muslim countries should adopt secular democracy caused surprise in Western capitals, and played a significant role in changing their views.

There are perhaps other reasons too, but these are the most important. Barring any new and surprising developments, it appears as though this current climate will be hard to undermine. Whether this goodwill continues, or the winds of diplomacy change direction once again, is completely in Erdoğan's hands.

More from Hürriyet in Turkish

photo - Greek prime minister's office

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

The Rush For Africa Is Getting Crowded — Who Will Be Shut Out?

African countries have shown through the Ukrainian war that their support should not be taken for granted. Chinese, Americans, Europeans and others are competing for influence on a continent that has become a global prize.

photo of Central business district Nairobi, Kenya

Central business district Nairobi, Kenya

Donwilson Odhiambo/ZUMA
Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — There was a time when the great powers of the world would compete against each other to conquer vast territories of the African continent. Today, they are instead vying to seduce, convince, and sometimes buy the support of countries that have never been so eagerly courted.

The 55 African States carry real value (no matter the criterion — be it economic, political, security, demographic) that leaves no one indifferent. Within two decades, China has become the lead partner of the continent, supplanting the former colonial powers; Russia is regaining its areas of influence from the old Soviet days, spearheaded by the Wagner paramilitary group; the Americans are back too; Turkey, India, Japan, and Brazil also have a dog in the fight.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest