The election of Donald Trump as the next president of the United States has prompted several reactions, with those who see his political ascension as the beginning of a new phase of political unrest â€" of which the Arab world is feared to carry the lionâ€™s share â€" being gripped by panic.
Immediately following the election results, Egyptâ€™s state-owned media outlets took pride in reporting that President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi had been the first head of state to officially congratulate Trump on his victory. In September, before the elections, Sisi praised the presidential candidate, asserting that he would be a strong leader.
Egyptâ€™s presidential office also issued a statement on Wednesday, congratulating Trump and expressing a hope that his presidency will marshal a new era of more cordial relations between Egypt and the White House.
â€œThe Egyptian Arab Republic is looking forward to the period of Donald Trumpâ€™s presidency to imbue new spirit into the path of Egyptian-American ties with more cooperation and coordination in the interests of both the Egyptian and American people,â€ the statement asserted.
Between the Egyptian governmentâ€™s response and the worries of Trumpâ€™s critics, where does the truth lie? What changes can be expected in the Middle East and the larger Arab world with a new president in the White House?
In congratulating Trump, Sisi invited the US president-elect to Egypt to continue discussions they began in September, on the sidelines of 71st session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City.
Rabab al-Mahdi, professor of political science at the American University in Cairo, says, â€œWe should not look at Trumpâ€™s victory in a conventional light and wonder what its effects on a specific country or region will be. Trumpâ€™s win is a defining moment in modern history, which is not an exaggeration to say. This moment resembles the ascent of fascism and the arrival of the Nazis to power in Germany through democratic elections.â€
While asserting that Trumpâ€™s influence will be global, Mahdi focused on two ramifications that the new US president will have on Egypt and the region.
â€œThe first point is political. We should completely forget talk about the US pressuring Egypt to improve its human rights situation or to expand the margins of freedom,â€ Mahdi says. â€œDue to Trumpâ€™s obsessions and complete ignorance regarding the nature of political development â€" including regarding the Islamic State â€" he will extend support to many dictatorships, at the forefront of which is Egyptâ€™s dictatorship, on the basis that they are fighting terrorism.â€
The AUC professorâ€™s second point focused on Egyptâ€™s economy. Trump continues to adhere to neoclassical economic tenets, according Mahdi, who argues that even neoliberals have widely abandoned these policies.
â€œIf the US and the rest of the world experience an economic downturn or a recession,â€ she says, â€œthese ideas and policies will have a dangerous effect upon the Egyptian economy, which is already in crisis.â€
The Palestinian cause
Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Trump engaged in acts of political one-upmanship concerning Israelâ€™s security interests throughout the election. However, Trumpâ€™s remarks were the most extreme.
â€œThe relationship between the US and Israel is intimate and fatalistic,â€ says Lebanese journalist and Arab affairs commentator Sam Matta. â€œHowever, during President Barack Obamaâ€™s administration this relationship suffered an unprecedented chill.â€
Matta adds that Netanyahuâ€™s government â€" which represents the far right of Israelâ€™s political spectrum, will gain significant support from the Trump administration. This development he says, will have â€œcatastrophic consequences for the Palestinian cause,â€ including an end to US pressure to halt or slow the expansion of Israeli settlements into the West Bank and the resumption of peace negotiations between the two sides.
Referencing Trumpâ€™s rejection of the two-state solution during his campaign, Matta warns that Palestinians may face the most hostile US foreign policy in recent memory, with Trumpâ€™s anti-Palestinian stance eclipsing former President George W. Bush.
During his campaign speeches, Trump insisted that the US needs to change its priorities in the Syrian civil war and to confine its efforts to fighting the Islamic State rather than pursuing a political solution or the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Firas al-Khaldi, a Syrian opposition organizer based in Cairo, argues that Trumpâ€™s comments were intended to garner approval from his base during the campaign.
Nonetheless, Khaldi adds that the Trump administration may change the USâ€™s stance on Syria. â€œTrump will be inclined to support Russiaâ€™s position,â€ he says, even if it faces intransigence from other US institutions, such as the Pentagon and the CIA.
But the change will be a balancing act between at times conflicting allegiances, Khaldi believes, as Trumpâ€™s extreme hostility toward Iran will find expression in open opposition to Assadâ€™s government, which relies on Iranian military support.
Trump also appears to have a conflicting stance regarding the ongoing armed conflict in Iraq.
Despite skepticism, Trump has repeatedly argued that he opposed the US-led invasion into Iraq in 2004, which became a protracted occupation. He has also claimed that radical and armed Islamist groups have since found safe haven in the country, necessitating US intervention. Moreover, Trump has campaigned for increased compensation for US military personnel who were wounded or killed in Iraq.
Researcher and political sociologist Ali al-Raggal highlights the president-electâ€™s conflict. â€œTrump will either move toward a resumption of military intervention in Iraq on the basis of being a superpower confronting terrorism, or he will move toward a sudden withdrawal. In both scenarios, the end results will be disastrous.â€
Military intervention will increase bloodshed and civilian casualties and further deteriorate human rights, while a unilateral withdrawal, Raggal contends would likely strengthen Islamist groups in their fight against the Iraqi armed forces.
Trump has not commented extensively on US foreign policy on the ongoing Yemeni civil war. When the issue did arise during an interview with CNN, he commented that Iran has involved itself in the Yemeni conflict because â€œthey want to seize the Saudi kingdomâ€™s and its oil.â€
Hamza Kamali, a member of the Yemeni National Dialogue Conference, criticizes the Obama administrationâ€™s decision to broker a nuclear deal with Iran, looking to the Republican Party as a welcome change. â€œWe are waiting for the Republican Party to change this policy. It is always better to build bridges of cooperation with the Republicans than the Democrats,â€ he says.
During his electoral campaign, Trump has referred to the US-Iranian nuclear deal as â€œthe worst deal ever negotiated.â€
Translated by Jano Charbel
Shahr-e Gholghola, City of Screams - Afghanistan
The ruins of Shahr-e Gholghola, the City of Screams, in Afghanistan
Gettysburg, Civil War battlefield - U.S.
View of the battlefields from Little Round Top, Gettysburg, PA, USA
Belchite, Civil War massacre - Spain
Old Belchite, Spain
Gur Emir, a conquerer’s mausoleum - Uzbekistan
Gur Emir (Tomb of Timur) in Samarkand, Uzbekistan
Still, on June 20, despite protests from local residents and Muslim clergy, Tamerlame's tomb was cracked open — marked with the inscription: "When I Rise From the Dead, The World Shall Tremble."
Gamla Stan, a royal massacre - Sweden
The red house of Gamla Stan, Stockholm, Sweden
Port Arthur, gruesome prison - Australia
Port Arthur Prison Settlement, Tasmania, Australia
Poveglia Island, plague victims - Italy
Poveglia Island, Italy
- From Beirut To Baghdad, Syria's Spillover Is Redrawing The Middle ... ›
- Tamales To Gonorrhea: How Violence Shaped Colombian Spanish ... ›
- Destination Chernobyl? Radioactivity, Jobs And Tourism ... ›