When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Factchecking Egypt's Grand Claims On New Suez Canal

Dredging the extension of the Suez Canal.
Dredging the extension of the Suez Canal.
Isabel Esterman

CAIRO — Egypt has been bombarded with a constant stream of messages this week about the miracles the New Suez Canal will bring. Not all of the claims hold up to scrutiny.

Claim: The new extension will allow two-way traffic along the canal.

Reality: This is sort of true — 60% true, to be more precise. The canal is 193 kilometers long, and 80.5 of those kilometers already allowed two-way traffic. With the new channel, that figure will increase to 115.5 km.

(Courtesy Suez Canal Authority)

As this diagram from the Suez Canal Authority shows, the extension will clear one of the canal's bottlenecks by adding a second lane on the stretch from the Ballah bypass (an existing two-lane stretch) to the Bitter Lakes (also an existing two-lane stretch). The red arrow (added by Mada Masr) indicates the 35-km-long new channel. The rest of the pink line shows the 37 km where existing shipping lanes have been dredged to allow larger ships to pass through.

Both of these changes will make things easier for shipping companies. Having a longer passing lane means that more ships can travel in each convoy and will make it easier to time north and southbound convoys. However, it won't eliminate the need for convoys, nor will it allow for unrestricted, free-flowing traffic through the canal.

Claim: The New Canal is an achievement on par with the opening of the original canal. Or, as Suez Canal Authority head Mohab Mamish recently phrased it, "equivalent to the passing of the nation from darkness to light."

Reality: The canal expansion is undoubtedly a significant public works achievement. But to say it "changes the map of the world" — as one billboard in New York City boasts — seems like a bit of a stretch.

To put it in perspective: The original canal cut transit distance between Europe and Asia by 8,900 km (43% of the total distance), and shortened the trip from London to the Arabian Gulf from 24 days to 14 days. The recent work on the canal will not reduce travel distance. According to the Canal Authority, the new channel will reduce waiting time from 8-11 hours to 3 hours. For southbound ships, it will shorten the transit time from 18 hours to 11 hours (other sources put the average transit time, pre-extension, at 14 hours).

In shipping, time is money, so any time savings is great for shipping companies. But it won't represent a major change to global commerce in the way the original canal did.

It's also worth noting that this is not the first time the canal has been expanded. Three small bypasses were completed in 1955, making a total of 27.7 km of two-lane stretches.

Two more bypasses were completed in 1980, adding a second lane to a total of 53.8 km. The longest of these was the 40.1-km Port Said bypass. The Associated Press has archival footage of the 1980 opening ceremony: a ribbon was cut and some balloons and doves were released. A nice enough party, but not really the "dazzling" spectacle promised for later this week.

Claim: The New Canal will more than double the revenue Egypt collects.

Reality: Since the announcement of the canal project, officials have claimed it will increase canal revenue to $13.5 billion per year by 2023, compared to just under $5.5 billion in 2014.

Economists and shipping experts have been dubious since the beginning, because the government can't really demonstrate how shaving a few hours off canal transit time will have such a dramatic effect on global trading patterns.

"The government's projections appear to be based on implausibly optimistic assumptions about world trade," economics research firm Capital Economics said in an analysis released Monday. This is basically economist code for "these numbers are totally baseless and unrealistic."

[rebelmouse-image 27089258 alt="""" original_size="460x275" expand=1]

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi inspecting Suez progress. Photo: Egyptian presidency

Capital Economics calculates that global trade would have to rise by 9% a year for the government to see that kind of an increase in canal traffic and revenue. Currently, global trade is growing by approximately 3% a year. During the economic boom of the early 2000s, it grew by around 7.5% per year. Reaching and sustaining 9% global growth by 2023 seems "unlikely to say the least," the firm notes.

Claim: The New Canal was financed entirely through the patriotism of ordinary Egyptian people.

Reality: The government raised LE64 billion ($8.1 billion) by selling Suez Canal bonds, which sold out within two weeks. About 88% of that came from private citizens. Along with the prospect of 12% interest, patriotism was most likely a motivating factor for many of those who bought the bonds. That amount wasn't, however, actually enough to build the canal. The government has since had to take out two additional loans from local banks, borrowing at least another $850 million.

There's nothing wrong with a party, and Egypt could do with something to celebrate at the moment — but some perspective doesn't hurt. While the canal looks like it will bring some benefits to the economy, it will not likely be the quick-fix for the country that some are promising.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

The Red Sea Attack Shows Two Scenarios For How The Gaza War Goes Global

Houthi rebels in Yemen have escalated their maritime attacks in the strategically vital Red Sea. Both their links to Iran, and the decision to target key shipping routes raises the risks for international escalation.

Crowd of newly recruied Houthi rebels participating in a military parade carrying weapons and rocket launchers. Holding and wearing both the Palestine flag and the Yemen flag.

Newly recruited Houthi rebels marching in a military parade

Source: Osamah Yahya/ZUMA
Elias Kassem


CAIROKeep your eye on Yemen. The Houthi rebel group from the war-torn Gulf nation has not attracted the same attention over the past two months as the Lebanese militants of Hezbollah, considered the most immediate risk of setting the spark that could ignite the Hamas-Israel war beyond Gaza.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Yet over the past 48 hours, a major Houthi attack on seaborne targets was launched with ballistic missiles and explosive-landed drones. The U.S. said one of its warships in the area shot down three drones in self-defense during the hours-long assault on the vessels, including the Bahamas-flagged bulk carrier Unity Explorer and the Panamanian-flagged bulk carriers Number 9 and Sophie II.

The Houthis claimed the attack in a statement read by their military spokesman, saying the targeted vessels have links with Israel, a claim Israel’s military denied.

“The Yemeni armed forces continue to prevent Israeli ships from navigating the Red Sea (and Gulf of Aden) until the Israeli aggression against our steadfast brothers in the Gaza Strip stops,” Brig. Gen. Yahya Saree said in the statement.

The U.S. military’s Central Command said in a statement that the attacks put at risk the lives of international crews working on the ships. And more broadly, CENTCOM warned that “these attacks represent a direct threat to international commerce and maritime security.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest