When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


China’s Slum Dwellers Need A Break

Editorial: China is failing its "most disadvantaged," argues economic historian Qin Hui, who likens Chinese slum demolition to the white South African government’s handling of shantytowns during apartheid.

China’s Slum Dwellers Need A Break
Qin Hui

Chinese authorities say they are committed to improving "public services' for "disadvantaged groups." Evidence suggests, however, that in certain slum areas some of the most disadvantaged are not only being neglected, but are also having their makeshift dwellings knocked down in the name of development.

Slum demolition has reportedly taken place in Hainan's Sanya, where people have lost their homes without any compensation. In Shenzhen Nanshan, authorities have also reportedly razed a shantytown known as the "the farm," leaving more than 200 residents with neither shelter nor compensation.

Even developing countries treat their poorest better than we do. It is regrettable enough that a country cannot protect its weak, but at the very least, the government should refrain from bullying them.

In India, migrant workers build their houses in the slums, but as long as they have some proof of residence, they will not be forcibly relocated. If businesses need to move someone for the sake of development, they approach that person and negotiate compensation.

Taiwan is another example. Their "urban renewal projects' (similar to our renewal and development projects) ran into problems with slums, or what they referred to as "illegal structures." But their residents have to be given adequate compensation in a timely manner. To address the problem of illegal squatting, Taiwan has built "renewed housing" for relocated residents. I've gone to see some of these housing projects and although the standard of housing is below that of low-cost public housing, the difference is minimal.

Recently, much of the "renewed housing" has undergone renovation. I found it unbelievable that this kind of compensation was even being offered to those who had inhabited what were seen as illegal dwellings.

Only one precedent comes to mind for what we do to our poor, and that is how the white imperialists in South Africa treated the black population under apartheid.

Like elsewhere, South African leaders used legal arguments to bulldoze poor neighborhoods. It's true that cities must have construction regulations and that no government in the world should be willing to have buildings built anywhere at all. In many cases, in other words, shantytowns are indeed "illegal structures."

The way the apartheid government in South Africa treated its black population was unjustifiable, but that said, laws can still reasonably regulate the expansion of slums. We don't expect shantytowns to crop up in New York's Times Square or London's Trafalgar Square, and for the sake of city planning and public good, construction must indeed be regulated.

But regulations must also respect human rights. On this point, I offer three recommendations:

First, regulations cannot benefit one party at the expense of all others. An issue that touches on basic human rights must be done legally and according to protocol. Laws concerning expropriation must also include input from all parties involved, including the victims and the so-called "floating population." Looking out for the interests of the documented urban population is not enough.

Next, the regulations must respect common decency and common sense. In the past, migrant workers in China were supposed to work in urban areas but leave their families in rural areas. This is not unlike the approach the white South African government took to dealing with its black labor population. These types of "floating populations' cannot be permanently sustained. Residence in the city is inevitable. What are migrants expected to do if we do not provide housing, if they cannot afford market prices, and simple, makeshift houses are deemed illegal?

Finally, regulations must be made for the long haul. They should not flip-flop or be constantly altered. In recent years, commentators have pointed out that the shantytowns in Shenzhen have already been there for over 20 years. It was a mistake not to deal with them then, but is it fair that the residents have to pay the price now?

Read the full version of this article.

Photo - Tarotastic

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

A New Survey Of Ukrainian Refugees: Here's What Will Bring Them Back Home

With the right support, Ukrainians are ready to return, even to new parts of the country where they've never lived.

photo of people looking at a destroyed building with a wall containing a Banksy work

People look at a Banksy work on a wall of a building destroyed by the Russian army, in the town of Borodyanka, northwest of Kyiv.

Sergei Chuzavkov / SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire
Daria Mykhailishyna

After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began, millions of Ukrainians fled their homes and went abroad. Many remain outside Ukraine. The Center for Economic Strategy and the Info Sapiens research agency surveyed these Ukrainian war refugees to learn more about who they are and how they feel about going home.

According to the survey, half of Ukrainians who went abroad are children. Among adults, most (83%) are women, and most (42%) are aged 35-49.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Most Ukrainian refugees have lost their income due to the war: 12% do not have enough money to buy food, and 28% have enough only for food.

The overwhelming majority of adult refugees (70%) have higher education. This figure is much higher than the share of people with higher education in Ukraine (29%) and the EU (33%).

The majority of Ukrainian refugees reside in Poland (38%), Germany (20%), the Czech Republic (12%), and Italy (6%). In these countries, they can obtain temporary protection, giving them the right to stay, work, and access healthcare and education systems.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest