When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The African Union Must Take A Stand On Tunisian President's Racist Tactics

Tunisia's president has risen to power on the back of populism that suggests black people are trying to replace Arabs. The African Union has not intervened, begging the question of what is its purpose.

Demonstrators in Tunis holding a banner saying "I'm an African, arrest me !" in a fight against racism in the country and against President Kais Saied

Demonstrators in Tunis protesting against racism and against President Saied's latest comments about the urgency to tackle illegal immigration in the country, on February 25, 2023.

Adama Wade


DAKAR — Habib Bourguiba led Tunisia to independence from France and led the country for over 30 years. The continent remembers Bourguiba the African, and the title of Supreme Fighter was awarded to him posthumously by the Mandela Institute in 2017.

The father of independence had time to embrace the African and Mediterranean dimension of his country and assimilate the three isms (pan-Africanism, pan-Arabism, and pan-Islamism) that constitute the Tunisian identity.

But the difference between Habib Bourguiba and the country's current President Kaci Saïed could not be more stark.

From Africanist to populist

Unlike Bourguiba the Africanist, Kais Saied was propelled to power by the populism of a drifting post-revolutionary Tunisia before locking down institutions in his favor by suspending parliament in July 2021.

Saied rose to the top of the hierarchy by exalting nationalism. The “hordes of illegal migrants" in his view with a "criminal plan" that wanted to "modify the demographic composition" of the country and breaking its "Arab-Islamic belonging".

The new strongman has awakened the basest instincts of the crowd by pulling on the rope of racism.

Democracy drowning in tyranny

The anti-black pogrom taking place in Tunisia today demands a structured response from the African Union. Beyond the mobilization of funds for repatriation, African countries must engage in a profound introspection on the usefulness of an organization that, 60 years after its creation, does not allow citizens to enjoy the freedom to move and settle wherever they want.

It's a prime example of the tyranny of a pseudo-majority.

Who would have thought that this country long considered stable and good for investment would see its fortunes shift so much?

Today's Tunisia shows the world a prime example of the tyranny of a pseudo-majority (a turnout of 88% was recorded in the last legislative elections) the outright absence of intellectual freedom.

Image of Tunisian President Kais Saied, wearing a navy suit and staring ahead, on his inauguration day as President of the Republic of Tunisia

Tunisian President Kais Saied on his inauguration day as President of the Republic of Tunisia on October 23 2019

Houcemmzoughi via Wikimedia Commons

Arab Spring legacy

In reality, behind the president's discourse is the tragic failure of a revolution based on just moral principles and legitimate economic frustrations. Let's dare to say it, the Arab Spring shattered the foundations of the Tunisian administration and vilified its social achievements.

With its current disdain for black people, it's easy to forget that this country abolished slavery in 1841, well before France.

Beyond the indignant reactions, beyond Europe's silence, which outsources its anti-migrant phobia to the southern shore of the Mediterranean, this unfortunate Tunisian situation should prompt the African Union to act.

We have had enough of signed but unimplemented treaties.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Morocco, Libya And Doubts About The True Motivations Of Western Humanitarian Aid

The practice of sending humanitarian aid to foreign countries has always been political, but Morocco's decision to refuse offers of search-and-rescue teams raises questions about national sovereignty and politics in times of crisis.

photo of rescue workers discussing the morocco earthquake

Firefighters deployed by the NGO United Firefighters Without Borders to the area of Morocco affected by the earthquake.

Matias Chiofalo/Contacto via ZUMA
Pierre Haski


PARIS — A deadly earthquake in Morocco, catastrophic flooding in Libya – two disasters in two countries on the southern shore of the Mediterranean have sparked strong emotions, and revived an old debate about humanitarian aid.

France dispatched a field hospital Thursday with 50 personnel to the region of Derna, on the Libyan coast, where the tragedy has claimed thousands of victims. The medical aid will be welcome in the country, which, after 10 years of instability, has no unified government.

At the beginning of this week, France was ready to send civil search and rescue experts, dogs and equipment to earthquake-struck Morocco – just as France did earlier this year after the earthquake in Turkey, and as it has done on many other occasions. But Morocco never gave the green light, and the search and rescue teams stayed in France. The same goes for teams offered by the U.S.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest