When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

This Happened

This Happened—November 4: U.S. Army Image Of Shame

The prisoners at Abu Graib, many of whom were civilians, were subject to torture, rape, sodomy, and other forms of physical and mental abuse at the hands of members of the U.S. Army and the CIA. The world may have never known if photographs, taken by some of the soldiers themselves, hadn't begun to circulate.

Sign up to receive This Happenedstraight to your inbox each day!

The best known image came to be known as "The Hooded Man," was taken by a U.S. army Sergeant on November 4, 2003.

What was the Hooded Man photo?

Among the various disturbing images revealed from Abu Ghraib, the Hooded Man has come to be considered the most iconic, and perhaps most shocking. It was taken by Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, depicting a man standing on a box, his head covered, with wires attached to both hands.

The photograph, and others captured at Abu Ghraib and leaked the following year, serve as a testament to the most shocking evidence of the U.S. abuses overseas. The photos depicting detainee abuse inside Abu Ghraib at the hands of U.S. troops, came to symbolize the morally bankrupt occupation of Iraq following the downfall of Saddam Hussein.

Who's the man in the Hooded Man photograph?

For years, the identity hooded man in the photograph remained unclear. He was originally thought to be Ali-Shallal al-Qaisi, who was imprisoned at Abu Ghraib after US military seized his football pitch in Iraq for the purpose of dumping corpses and waste. He was arrested after attempting to contact foreign reporters about the incident.

The prisoner who'd been nicknamed Gilligan was later correctly identified as Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh. In another photo, which was taken approximately three minutes after the iconic picture with a different camera, Frederick is standing to the right of Abdou Hussain Saad Faleh.

Were  U.S. soldiers ever held responsible for Abu Ghraib torture?

There were 17 U.S. soldiers and officers removed from duty, with several faced court martial and sentenced to prison time.

Sgt. Ivan Frederick, who took the Hooded Man photo, pleaded guilty in May 2004 to conspiracy, dereliction of duty, maltreatment of detainees, assault, and indecent acts. Sentenced to eight years, he also lost Army rank and pay, and was dishonorably discharged. In Oct. 2007, he was released on parole after serving nearly four years in prison.

Accountability never made its way up the chain of command. These events were only revealed to the American public when a collection of disturbing photographs taken by specialist Sabrina Harman were released to the public.

A memo written before the U.S. invaded Iraq was later revealed to have authorized certain “advanced interrogation techniques”, arguing that foreign prisoners detained overseas are not subject to the Geneva Conventions.

In 2004, a group of former detainees of Abu Ghraib prison filed a lawsuit claiming that they had been the victims of the abuse captured in photographs. The Supreme Court has since clarified that the U.S. military is in fact subject to the Geneva Conventions overseas, but not in time to prevent abuses like the ones at Abu Ghraib from taking place.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

That Man In Mariupol: Is Putin Using A Body Double To Avoid Public Appearances?

Putin really is meeting with Xi in Moscow — we know that. But there are credible experts saying that the person who showed up in Mariupol the day before was someone else — the latest report that the Russian president uses a doppelganger for meetings and appearances.

screen grab of Putin in a dark down jacket

During the visit to Mariupol, the Presidential office only released screen grabs of a video

Russian President Press Office/TASS via ZUMA
Anna Akage

Have no doubt, the Vladimir Putin we’re seeing alongside Xi Jinping this week is the real Vladimir Putin. But it’s a question that is being asked after a range of credible experts have accused the Russian president of sending a body double for a high-profile visit this past weekend in the occupied Ukrainian city of Mariupol.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Reports and conspiracy theories have circulated in the past about the Russian leader using a stand-in because of health or security issues. But the reaction to the Kremlin leader's trip to Mariupol is the first time that multiple credible sources — including those who’ve spent time with him in the past — have cast doubt on the identity of the man who showed up in the southeastern Ukrainian city that Russia took over last spring after a months-long siege.

Russian opposition politician Gennady Gudkov is among those who confidently claim that a Putin look-alike, or rather one of his look-alikes, was in the Ukrainian city.

"Now that there is a war going on, I don't rule out the possibility that someone strongly resembling or disguised as Putin is playing his role," Gudkov said.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest