When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

War In Gaza: Will You Hate Each Other Forever?

It is becoming harder and harder to even imagine an end to the cycle of anger and vengeance.

Palestinian protesters burning tires in Ramallah, West Bank, in solidarity with Gaza
Palestinian protesters burning tires in Ramallah, West Bank, in solidarity with Gaza


To justify the ground offensive against Gaza launched during the night of July 17 and 18, Israel put forth a precise goal: destroy Hamas's network of tunnels. These galleries enable the Palestinian Islamist movement to hide its arsenal of rockets and organize attacks on Israeli soil.

Israel has good arguments on its side. With the help of Iran, Syria, and the money from certain Gulf emirates, Hamas equipped itself over recent years with an ever more sophisticated arsenal of rockets. As we have seen these last few days, some of these missiles can reach large Israeli cities.

Hamas fires these projectiles completely indiscriminately, looking to strike in the heart of urban areas. The aim is to kill as many as possible — civilians, in particular.

Human shield

Israeli civilians have so far been spared from the some 1,000 rockets fired from Gaza since July 7 — the beginning of this umpteenth confrontation between both parties — for two reasons: a remarkable civil defense organization and a more and more efficient anti-missile system.

Israel also has credible arguments when accusing Hamas of installing its launch pads in underground shelters right in the middle of the Palestinian population — and of using the latter as a “human shield.” As recently as Thursday, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) discovered more than 20 rockets concealed in one of its schools.

But despite this range of very serious justifications, Israel is wrong to think that its security will be ensured by further military operations in Gaza. It will not — or at best only for a short period of time: The last ground operation carried out by the army in this territory, “Cast Lead,” dates back to 2008-2009.

In light of this reality, it is important to assess the risks taken by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government with the operation launched on July 17. The risks are great — and they weigh, first and foremost, on the Palestinian civilian population.

Where to hide?

In only ten days, the people of Gaza have already paid a huge price: 257 dead — including many children — and some 1,700 wounded. Israel says the army warns the civilian population before striking. But where can people go? Where can entire families take shelter when a whole, overpopulated territory of almost 2 million people is under the fire of one of the best-equipped armies in the world?

We know the result. We have seen it this week, with the “mistake” of a repeated strike — three shells — on a group of children playing on a Gaza beach.

The former president of the Israeli parliament, Avraham Burg — an isolated voice — said it in Le Monde: Military force is not a solution. Burg is not naïve. He knows that after Hamas, it will be jihadists who, fueled by violence, will keep feeding the desire for vengeance.

In such a complete political vacuum between Israelis and Palestinians, hatred gains new ground every day. What comes to mind is a verse, fittingly from a tragedy, Andromaque, by French playwright Jean Racine: “Has your anger not yet run its course? Will you hate forever, with eternal force?"

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Why Poland's Draconian Anti-Abortion Laws May Get Even Crueler

Poland has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in Europe. Several parties vying in national elections on Oct. 15 are competing for conservative Catholic voters by promising new laws that could put women's lives at risk.

Photograph of a woman with her lower face covered holding a red lightning bolt - the symbol of the Women's Strike - during the demonstration outside Kaczynski's house.

November 28, 2022, Warsaw, Poland: A protester holds a red lightning bolt - the symbol of the Women's Strike - during the demonstration outside Kaczynski's house.

Attila Husejnow/ZUMA
Katarzyna Skiba


In 2020, Poland was rocked by mass protests when the country’s Constitutional Tribunal declared abortions in the case of severe fetal illness or deformity illegal. This was one of only three exceptions to Poland’s ban on abortions, which now only applies in cases of sexual assault or when the life of the mother is at risk.

Since the 2020 ruling, several women have filed complaints to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) after giving birth to children with severe fetal abnormalities, many of whom do not survive long after birth. One woman working at John Paul II hospital in the Southern Polish town of Nowy Targ told Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza that a patient was forced to give birth to a child suffering from acrania a lethal disorder where infants are born without a skull.

However, even in cases where abortion is technically legal, hospitals and medical professionals in Poland still often refuse to perform the procedure, citing moral objections.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest