When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Future

​Will There Be A Legal Right To Telework?

Silicon Valley firms are leading the way in corporate policy, while European countries like Germany are beginning to draw up laws to create a bonafide legal right to work from home.

Photo of a man working on his laptop while sat on a couch, with a power plug and a cup of tea in the foreground.

Home office, sweet home office

Carl-Johan Karlsson

Employers and governments around the world have been oscillating between full remote requirements to everyone-back-to-the-office to forever-flex schedules. Now, two years into the pandemic, working from home appears bound to be a feature of our current existence that will be with us — in some form — once COVID-19 is gone.

But even as companies experiment with different policies, others are pushing to see it translated into law — in other words, to make working from home a right.


The leading edge of the debate is undoubtedly in Europe, with a handful of countries considering changes to, or even already having altered, their labor laws in the wake of the first pandemic lockdowns.

​Mandatory two days minimum

In Luxembourg, after a petition to recognize the right to telework was introduced in April 2020, the chamber of deputies published a new petition last month to make two days of remote work a week mandatory, Delano magazine reports; In Poland, where eight in 10 employees indicate hybrid work as their ideal choice, a new bill regarding remote work was introduced last May; while in Spain, a new law was passed in September 2020 to regulate home working.

The impediments of remote work can often extend well beyond manual labor.

But no country has yet gone as far as Germany, where Federal Minister of Labor Hubertus Heil recently announced plans to make the home office a legally protected part of German work culture. The new coalition government is currently drawing up a law that would provide employees with a legal right to work from home — granting employers the right to refuse only if there are legitimate “operational reasons.”

The government’s announcement has raised questions about what “operational reasons” will actually mean in practice. Writing in German daily Die Welt, Gregor Thüsing, Director of the Institute for Labor Law at the University of Bonn, notes that the only example provided by Heil that would justify forced on-site work is industrial labor — which sets a very high bar for the ability of employers to demand that any white-collar employees come into the office.
Photo of two people working on their laptops

Office is were the home is.

images.unsplash.com

​Data protection, stunted creativity

Thüsing suggests that the impediments of remote work can often extend well beyond manual labor, noting that operations can also be undermined by limited dialogue between employees, stunted creativity and — increasingly in our digital age — compromised data protection.

Of course, the always-connected internet reality also raises questions about the rights of workers in their off-hours, with Portugal passing a law last year that made it a crime to disturb employees when they’re not on the clock.

Still, on both fronts, the most crucial question might be whether countries can manage to regulate digital working rights without an overly bureaucratic postiche and runaway corporate costs.

Remote work is an “aberration that we’re going to correct as soon as possible.”

Following the introduction of Spain’s home-working law in 2020, El Pais reports that the new regulation — forcing companies to cover the cost of “all resources, equipment and tools” needed by a worker to carry out their job remotely — has incurred unmanageable costs for smaller companies.

Google and Facebook flex first

In the UK, reports last year that the government was planning on granting employees the right to request flexible working from the moment they start a job sparked controversy as businesses warned that such cumbersome legislation would cause corporate chaos.

In the U.S., major tech firms like Google and Facebook have been convinced by the pandemic experience that full flexibility is the best corporate policy, though as WIRED recently reported, some of those who choose full remote may see their pay cut.

Leaders in the U.S. banking and finance sector, instead, have pushed to force all employees back to the office as soon as the spread of the virus slows. Last winter, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said remote work is an “aberration that we’re going to correct as soon as possible.”

With labor rights in Africa and Asia even thinner than the U.S., those advocating legal protection for remote work will focus on advances in such countries as Germany, Spain and France — not to mention cutting-edge private-sector policies in Silicon Valley.

For once, it seems, European governments and U.S. Big Tech may actually be aligned.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Economy

The Bogus Concept Of "Carbon-Neutral" Oil

The Colombian president recently said that the country had exported one million barrels of carbon-neutral or offset oil. But in an unregulated carbon market, such a claim is pure greenwashing.

People walk in the streets of Bogotá

María Mónica Monsalve Sánchez

-OpEd-

BOGOTÁ - In March this year, various national and corporate leaders met in Houston, Texas, for CERAWeek, an annual conference to discuss the world's energy challenges. Colombia's President Iván Duque took the opportunity to remind participants that his country produced just 0.6% of the world's carbon emissions even as it had raised crude production to one million barrels a day.

He said oil should not be seen as an enemy, since the fight was really against greenhouse gas emissions. He also revealed at the event that the country's national oil firm, Ecopetrol, had sold the Asian market its first million barrels of carbon-neutral or offset crude, consisting of the entire extraction, production and exportation chain.

Keep reading... Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch Video Show less
MOST READ