When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Can Epilepsy Unlock The Secret To Happiness?

Colors of joy
Colors of joy
Francesca Sacco

GENEVA — No need to read Plato’s complete works or learn by heart the words of the Dalai Lama to understand the meaning of happiness. Science may have the answers. At the University Hospital of Geneva (UHG), neurologist Fabienne Picard has been studying for years a very rare phenomenon that scientific literature barely talks about and that she says “Dostoyevsky was the first to describe:” ecstatic seizures experienced by certain epileptic people.

Those affected describe an intense feeling of well-being. “It feels like an orgasm in the way that it arrives,” one of Picard’s patients tells New Scientist magazine. “An orgasm doesn’t arrive straight away,” the patient, Sandra, continues. “It’s something that builds up in intensity. During an ecstatic seizure, it’s the same thing. After a while, everything becomes clear and consistent to me. I feel in harmony with the world.”

Sandra also compares the effect of epileptic seizures to an experience she had using the drug LSD. “Later, I went to see an exhibition, and I had the impression that I understood everything.” They are also like dreams, she says. “When you describe your dreams to someone, you realize you can’t really manage to explain what you felt.”

Says another patient: “The orgasm is maybe the closest sensation that I know. But what I felt wasn’t sexual; it was more mystical. Thanks to these experiences, I’m no longer scared of death.”

“What I hear the most in my patients’ stories,” Picard says, “is a feeling of fullness, consistency, time dilation, mental clarity and the total absence of doubt. They tell me that they’ve never experienced anything better, so powerful. It sounds like a huge eureka!”

For a lucky few

Most epileptic fits are considered to be partial and, according to some estimates, only 0.5% of patients experience the feeling of ecstasy. “We don’t know the exact percentage, because these patients hesitate to talk about their symptoms,” Picard says. “They are scared they will seem strange.”

How can this phenomenon be explained? According to the researcher, it finds its origins in the insula, an area located deep inside the groove that separates the frontal area and the parietal area of the temporal lobe. During seizures, it seems that this area of the brain, which constantly makes predictions based on internal and external stimuli, momentarily abandons its fundamental mission to maintain control of everything that represents a threat to the body’s internal balance. Picard formulated this hypothesis in an article published earlier this year by the magazine Cortex.

“Today, we think that the brain is a ‘prediction machine’ looking to improve itself based on the principle of trial and error learning,” the neurologist explains. “We’ve known for a long time that this way of acquiring skills can be applied to any type of every-day life situation — for instance, predicting financial risks — but the idea that the brain constantly makes predictions even for internal stimuli, and at a speed-scale much shorter than seconds, is new, to my knowledge.”

Of course, the system inevitably generates a number of anticipation errors, which can lead to a feeling of doubt and discomfort. But, during an ecstatic seizure, it seems that the insula ceases predicting and “comparing results.” Picard explains that “the data keeps on circulating, but there is no longer any comparison process with the physical and sensory feedback — so no more error reports — hence, most likely, this feeling of confidence, well-being and inner-peace.”

Some researchers wonder if, because of this, these patients could lose all sense of fear and place themselves in dangerous situations. “It appears that they don’t,” Picard answers. “What they experience is a feeling of coherence and contemplation. So we can assume that the feeling of well-being — and therefore in some way happiness — depends more or less on the system that handles anticipation errors.” From this point of view, the tranquility produced by meditation could be explained by the minimization of anticipation errors. Basically, during those moments the body is subjected to almost no mental change whatsoever.

This theory is supported by cerebral imaging. But new studies are necessary to truly understand the role the insula and the system that produces anticipation errors play. The extremely small number of patients experiencing ecstatic seizures seriously holds up the research. For those in need of a surgical operation, it is possible to implant electrodes inside and around the insula to carry out medical observation. Picard’s new research on the first controlled, induced ecstatic seizure — via electric stimulation — is about to be published in Cortex.

Antoine Bechara, an expert in behavioral neurosciences at the University of Southern California, considers Picard’s theory “absolutely fantastic.”

And, says Kaspar Anton Schindler, head of epileptic diagnostics at the University Hospital of Bern: “I find this theory to be very plausible. It probably won’t be easy to validate, but it has the merit of shedding light on the positive aspects of epilepsy, because until now, we mostly studied its negative aspects.”

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The Problem With Always Blaming Climate Change For Natural Disasters

Climate change is real, but a closer look at the science shows there are many factors that contribute to weather-related disasters. It is important to raise awareness about the long-term impact of global warming, but there's a risk in overstating its role in the latest floods or fires.

People on foot, on bikes, motorcycles, scooters and cars navigate through a flooded street during the day time.

Karachi - People wade through flood water after heavy rain in a southern Pakistani city

Xinhua / ZUMA
Axel Bojanowski


BERLIN — In September, thousands of people lost their lives when dams collapsed during flooding in Libya. Engineers had warned that the dams were structurally unsound.

Two years ago, dozens died in floods in western Germany, a region that had experienced a number of similar floods in earlier centuries, where thousands of houses had been built on the natural floodplain.

Last year saw more than 1,000 people lose their lives during monsoon floods in Pakistan. Studies showed that the impact of flooding in the region was exacerbated by the proximity of human settlements, the outdated river management system, high poverty rates and political instability in Pakistan.

There are many factors that contribute to weather-related disasters, but one dominates the headlines: climate change. That is because of so-called attribution studies, which are published very quickly after these disasters to highlight how human-caused climate change contributes to extreme weather events. After the flooding in Libya, German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung described climate change as a “serial offender," while the Tageszeitung wrote that “the climate crisis has exacerbated the extreme rainfall."

The World Weather Attribution initiative (WWA) has once again achieved its aim of using “real-time analysis” to draw attention to the issue: on its website, the institute says its goal is to “analyse and communicate the possible influence of climate change on extreme weather events." Frederike Otto, who works on attribution studies for the WWA, says these reports help to underscore the urgent need for climate action. They transform climate change from an “abstract threat into a concrete one."

In the immediate aftermath of a weather-related disaster, teams of researchers rush to put together attribution studies – “so that they are ready within the same news cycle," as the New York Times reported. However, these attribution studies do not meet normal scientific standards, as they are published without going through the peer-review process that would be undertaken before publication in a specialist scientific journal. And that creates problems.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest