When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Future

Brazil Cooks The Numbers After Betting Big On Study Abroad Program

A probe finds Dilma's government taking shortcuts to achieving competitiveness for the country.

Dilma Rousseff wants a competitive and innovative Brazil
Dilma Rousseff wants a competitive and innovative Brazil
Sabine Righetti and Tai Nalon

BRASILIA – At the center of President Dilma Rousseff's education policy is a plan to send 101,000 students abroad by 2015.

Launched in 2011, the Science Without Borders program selects candidates and covers school fees and living costs for them to study in undergraduate programs abroad, with the long-term goal of increasing the nation's competitiveness and entrepreneurship.

Brazilian universities submit their top students for eligibility. Out of the 101,000 scholarships, 75,000 are paid for by the government and the rest by the private sector.

However, the goal of 101,000 students is considered unrealistic by many, and indeed the program has been having a hard time finding enough eligible students.

The department within the Brazilian Ministry of Education devoted to the evaluation and expansion of higher education in Brazil – Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) – is one of the agencies involved in selecting students for the program.

It has now been revealed that the Ministry of Education was fudging the numbers of Science without Borders (SWB) by including scholarship students already receiving grants from CAPES.

Before SWB was launched, CAPES awarded 4,000 grants a year. Their scholarships and the SWB grants are similar, but selection criteria and international acceptance differ greatly. Also, SWB offers a narrower range of fields, excluding almost all humanities. The program targets students studying science, technology, math and engineering.

About 22,646 SWB grants have been awarded since the program was launched in 2011, but it has now been revealed that a significant portion of the grants had been awarded to students that had not gone through the SWB process.

In 2012, 280 students were selected for the program. At least 60 of these students had their names listed on the SWB website as being grant recipients while not actually being in the program. We spoke to 25 of these students in eight countries. Many of them were surprised to be named as grant recipients on the SWB website, as they had not even applied for the program. Three of them said they had actually been rejected by SWB.

Quantity, not quality

This is not the only way that Brazil is looking more scholarly than it really is.

Brazilian scientific production is rising, as measured by the number of academic papers published in scientific journals. But the quality of the work has not increased with the rise of scientific publications.

According to SCImago, a platform that ranks the scientific influence of scholarly journals, in 2011, Brazil was ranked 13th globally against 17th in 2001 – an achievement that has been celebrated in scientific spheres all around the country.

In 2011, Brazilian researchers published three and half times more articles than they did in 2001. But the problem is that the quality of these papers have decreased, something which can be measured by the number of times each article is cited by others. For quality of articles, Brazil fell from 31st place in 2001 to 40th in 2011. Meanwhile, China and Russia, who both fare very poorly in quality rankings, managed to each climb a few positions. In this regard, the best-ranked countries are Switzerland and Denmark.

According to experts, one of the reason there is a jump in quantity of scientific articles while there is a fall in citations is the increase in the number of Brazilian scholarly journals – from 62 to 270 journals in ten years.

The problem is that scientific articles published in Brazilian journals have a small impact, in part because of the language barrier. Only 16 of these journals received one or more citations per article, while Nature, for instance received about 36 citations per article.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Economy

Europe's Winter Energy Crisis Has Already Begun

in the face of Russia's stranglehold over supplies, the European Commission has proposed support packages and price caps. But across Europe, fears about the cost of living are spreading – and with it, doubts about support for Ukraine.

Protesters on Thursday in the German state of Thuringia carried Russian flags and signs: 'First our country! Life must be affordable.'

Martin Schutt/dpa via ZUMA
Stefanie Bolzen, Philipp Fritz, Virginia Kirst, Martina Meister, Mandoline Rutkowski, Stefan Schocher, Claus, Christian Malzahn and Nikolaus Doll

-Analysis-

In her State of the Union address on September 14, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, issued an urgent appeal for solidarity between EU member states in tackling the energy crisis, and towards Ukraine. Von der Leyen need only look out her window to see that tensions are growing in capital cities across Europe due to the sharp rise in energy prices.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

In the Czech Republic, people are already taking to the streets, while opposition politicians elsewhere are looking to score points — and some countries' support for Ukraine may start to buckle.

With winter approaching, Europe is facing a true test of both its mettle, and imagination.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ