September 11, 2013
BEIRUT — As night was falling, a police siren rang throughout the streets of Beirut’s rich neighborhood of Achrafieh. The police car opened the way to a convoy of cars in the middle of which, in a luxurious black Mercedes, a young just-married couple were waving to the few onlookers still striding along Independence Avenue that time of the day. Under heavy security surveillance, the Lebanese capital has gradually managed to return to near-normal life since President Barack Obama announced Aug. 30 he would ask the U.S. Congress to vote on strikes against the Syrian regime.
The Lebanese, glued to their televisions, welcomed the adjournment of strikes with surprise, thinking they would be imminent once UN experts finished their mission and left Syria. After a few days of astonishment, residents here eventually went back to their daily routine. Traffic jams reappeared all across town, and people rushed back to the cafés and bars. Beirut recovered a part of the sweet and casual life that makes its reputation in the whole region.
But the respite could be short. Though Russia’s offer of a diplomatic solution casts doubt over potential U.S. strikes in Syria, this week nevertheless could be fraught with danger as the U.S. Congress debates possible intervention. Beirut is holding its breath. Many Lebanese fear a military operation would have inevitable consequences on the country. “Whatever happens in Syria, it affects us, and unfortunately, it’s always in a negative way,” says Kifah, an executive manager.
“We’re the weak link. If the strikes are limited to punishing only, we don’t care,” one 54-year-old Shiite worries. “But if they try to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, there will be a war with Israel, and the Lebanese will start killing each other. The Sunni will feel stronger against the Shia movement Hezbollah, an ally of the Syrian regime, and they will attack it.”
His friend Fadi is more worried about Syria and Lebanon falling into the hands of Jihadists. “In every war, we know how it starts but not how it ends. There is the risk of falling into total war.” These fears have been reinforced by threats of reprisals and of regional destabilization used by Damascus and its allies, the Hezbollah and Iran.
Obama’s decision to postpone intervention stirred up mixed feelings of relief and frustration. “Barack Obama is playing with our nerves,” says Nadine, a 30-year-old woman from Beirut. “He doesn’t realize the stress and the suffering he is causing for millions of people in Lebanon and Syria. We’re about to have a heart attack over here.”
Some still hope that the intervention will be abandoned and replaced by a political solution much like what Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed. “There might be a miracle,” say Doran Farkour, a 21-year-old Christian. “Because if there is an intervention, it will be World War III.”
Arguments such as that, though, anger supporters of action in Syria. “How can we not react after Bashar al-Assad’s massacred his own people!” shouts Rania, a 31-year-old woman. “It doesn’t surprise me. We did let 100,000 Syrians die under the bombings.”
Many intervention supporters feel that limited strikes will not undermine Lebanon. “The intervention will have no direct effect on Lebanon,” says Ramez Hachahi, a 70-year-old Christian businessman. “The Hezbollah will be diminished, but it will keep control of the situation in Lebanon and will do nothing to destabilize the country. The other movements won’t dare to attack it either.”
Foreigners advised to leave
Obama’s delay has once again rallied opponents of strikes. They see in his hesitation the possibility of the American position changing. Over the weekend, dozens of Lebanese citizens and activists from Damascus-allied parties tried to demonstrate against the intervention outside Beirut’s American embassy. But it was in vain. Access to the hill that leads to the embassy had been blocked off by an armada of security forces. Given the threats, embassies and foreign interests were placed under heavy protection, and American and foreign citizens were advised to leave the Lebanese territory.
“No one wants to die like the 30 million people who were killed in Iraq or Afghanistan by American imperialism,” says Walid, a 28-year-old engineer who came to demonstrate. “The U.S. said they wanted to import democracy; they brought chaos. The fate of the Syrian people must be discussed during the Geneva II conference, not by encouraging chaos.”
As for Hezbollah, they think the Western forces will retreat the whole way. “They know they won’t have time to attack,” says Wissam, a 34-year-old sympathizer of the Party of God in Dahieh, in Beirut’s southern suburbs. “Maybe there will be a strike, but it will be short with immediate attacks against U.S. military bases. The Hezbollah is prepared to retaliate if Israel attacks in the south of Lebanon.”
The Shia party’s stronghold is now completely surrounded by roadblocks, each held by dozens of militiamen in civilian clothes, who control the identities and the vehicles of each person entering the premises.
The possibility of the U.S. and its allies — France in front — abandoning the idea of the military option will probably not change Lebanese security reflexes. The conflict that has been going on for two years in neighboring Syria has already hit Beirut and the rest of Lebanon with full force. The deadly bombings that struck the Roueiss neighborhood on Aug. 15, in the heart of the Hezbollah’s stronghold of Dahieh, in the south of the capital, and Sunni mosques in Tripoli, in the north of the country, on Aug. 23, spark fears of a new wave of car bombings.
“We’re scared of leaving the house,” says Marc Ghanem, a 22-year-old Christian student. “Even our parents worry a lot and don’t want us to leave the Christian zone. We don’t think of the long-term anymore.” His friend Doran can only imagine leaving the country. “There’s nothing left for us here: no state, no money, no jobs. The Syrian refugees either buy everything because they have money, of work for insignificant wages when they have nothing,” she says.
Slightly older citizens, who are used to political instability in Lebanon, are more resigned. “We go out less. Not because we are scared — we already went through this in 1976, the car bombings, the Lebanese factions,” says Sabah, a 47-year-old Shia banker. “But because it’s demoralizing. We know where all this can go. There will be more bombings here in Dahieh, despite all the security measures the Hezbollah set up. But there won’t be a civil war.”
The apartment of Wissam, the Hezbollah sympathizer, was entirely destroyed during the 2006 war with Israel, amd it was once again devastated by the Roueiss car bombing. But the man views the future with detachment. “When Israel bombed our neighborhood in 2006, we kept on smoking chichi with our friends on the balcony, and we kept on going with our daily lives despite the Israeli jets flying above our heads.”
The increasing polarization between Sunnis, mostly pro-rebellion, and Shia, mostly pro-Syrian regime, also feeds fears of a new fratricidal war. The memories of the Lebanese civil war, which divided the country between 1975 and 1990, are surfacing once more into people’s minds. The Christians, in minority and politically divided, fear being stuck between the two sides and targeted indiscriminately, just like their counterparts were in Iraq. The people are blaming Lebanese politicians, who have all taken sides on the Syrian conflict, as responsible for the Lebanese destabilization.
It’s a destabilization worsened by the country’s crumbling and the political forces’ inability to agree on the formation of a government since Prime Minister Tammam Salam was appointed in April. “Lebanese politicians are like pawns in a game of chess — foreign countries control them,” says Marc Ghanem, a young Christian.
Businessman Ramez Hachachi is for a military dictatorship in Lebanon. “The problem is that we don’t have a government. The country is in the hands of foreign powers, and we don’t have any real leader.”
This leading French daily newspaper Le Monde ("The World") was founded in December 1944 in the aftermath of World War II. Today, it is distributed in 120 countries. In late 2010, a trio formed by Pierre Berge, Xavier Niel and Matthieu Pigasse took a controlling 64.5% stake in the newspaper.
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
"Xi Jinping Thought" ideas on socialism have been spreading across the country since 2017. But now, Beijing is going one step further by making them part of the curriculum, from the elementary level all the way up to university.
October 26, 2021
BEIJING — It's important to strengthen the "determination to listen to and follow the party." Also, teaching materials should "cultivate patriotic feelings." So say the new guidelines issued by the Chinese Ministry of Education.
The goal is to help Chinese students develop more "Marxist beliefs," and for that, the government wants its national curriculum to include "Xi Jinping Thought," the ideas, namely, of China's current leader.
Xi Jinping has been the head of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for almost 10 years. In 2017, at a party convention, he presented a doctrine in the most riveting of party prose: "Xi Jinping's ideas of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new age."
Behind this word jam is a plan to consolidate the power of the nation, the party and Xi himself. In other words, to make China great again!
Communist curriculum replaces global subjects
This doctrine has sent shockwaves through China since 2017. It's been echoed in newspapers, on TV, and screamed from posters and banners hung in many cities. But now, the People's Republic is going one step further: It's bringing "Xi Jinping Thought" into the schools.
Starting in September, the country's 300 million students have had to study the doctrine, from elementary school into university. And in some cities, even that doesn't seem to be enough. Shanghai announced that its students from third to fifth grade would only take final exams in mathematics and Chinese, de facto deleting English as an examination subject. Beijing, in the meantime, announced that it would ban the use of unauthorized foreign textbooks in elementary and middle schools.
But how does a country that enchants its youth with socialist ideology and personality cults rise to become a world power? Isn't giving up English as a global language the quickest way into isolation?
The educational reform comes at a time when Beijing is brutally disciplining many areas of public life, from tech giants to the entertainment industry. It has made it difficult for Chinese technology companies to go public abroad, and some media have reported that a blanket ban on IPOs in the United States is on the cards in the next few years.
Targeting pop culture
The regime is also taking massive action against the entertainment industry. Popstar Kris Wu was arrested on charges of rape. Movies and TV series starring actor Zhao Wei have started to disappear from Chinese streaming platforms. The reason is unclear.
What the developments do show is that China is attempting to decouple from the West with increasing insistence. Beijing wants to protect its youth from Western excesses, from celebrity worship, super wealth and moral decline.
A nationalist blogger recently called for a "profound change in the economy, finance, culture and politics," a "revolution" and a "return from the capitalists to the masses." Party media shared the text on their websites. It appears the analysis caused more than a few nods in the party headquarters.
Dictatorships are always afraid of pluralism.
Caspar Welbergen, managing director of the Education Network China, an initiative that aims to intensify school exchanges between Germany and China, says that against this background, the curriculum reform is not surprising.
"The emphasis on 'Xi Jinping Thought' is being used in all areas of society," he says. "It is almost logical that China is now also using it in the education system."
Needless to say, the doctrine doesn't make student exchanges with China any easier.
Dictatorships are always afraid of color, pluralism and independent thinking citizens. And yet, Kristin Kupfer, a Sinology professor at the University of Trier, suggests that ideologically charged school lessons should not be interpreted necessarily as a sign of weakness of the CCP.
From the point of view of a totalitarian regime, she explains, this can also be interpreted as a signal of strength. "It remains to be seen whether the Chinese leadership can implement this so thoroughly," Kupfer adds. "Initial reactions from teachers and parents on social media show that such a widespread attempt to control opinion has raised fears and discontent in the population."
From Your Site Articles
- In China's Crackdown On Religions, Buddhism Gets A Pass ... ›
- Strait Talk: China Invading Taiwan Is Mostly Just A Matter Of Time ... ›
- Why Hong Kong Means So Much To Xi Jinping - Worldcrunch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Die Welt ("The World") is a German daily founded in Hamburg in 1946, and currently owned by the Axel Springer AG company, Europe's largest publishing house. Now based in Berlin, Die Welt is sold in more than 130 countries. A Sunday edition called Welt am Sonntag has been published since 1948.
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!