When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Three Lessons From Wagner's Insurrection — None Are Good News For The Tsar

The fate of Prigozhin, Putin and Ukraine hang in the balance. And though much is still not clear, Russia is simply no longer under the reign of an all-powerful Vladimir Putin.

A tank in the streets of Russia.

A tank in the streets of Russia during the Wagner insurrection.

Pierre Haski


The dramatic events that shook Russian President Vladimir Putin's power for a few hours this weekend still have more secrets to reveal — and the shock wave could be felt for weeks and months in unexpected ways.

At this point, we can draw at least three lessons from the events that have ushered Russia into a new era.

First, we must address Wagner mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin, the anti-hero of this episode. While historians may struggle to define him, they will at least agree that he was a creature of Putin and that he escaped the president's control by seeking to become the master of the game himself.

When Putin talked about a "stab in the back" in his Saturday morning address, he was describing the betrayal of a man who owes him everything but violated the golden rule of the leader's relationship.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Prigozhin gained confidence by offering Putin his only victory of the year in Bakhmut, Ukraine — albeit at the most barbaric human cost. But Prigozhin engaged in a power struggle with Moscow's military leaders and lost. What will remain of Prigozhin and Wagner when the dust settles? It's not certain that they will carry much weight. One does not challenge the Tsar without being sure of winning— that is the first lesson.

Pyrrhic victory for Putin

What about Putin? That remains the crucial question. Putin is undoubtedly weakened by this crisis. It's true that he held onto power, that there was no civil war and that Moscow remains under control. But it is only a Pyrrhic victory.

For more than 20 years, Putin's power has been built on the myth of the strongman. He did not establish a modern state but rather created a "system" based on the redistribution of income, a multifaceted security apparatus and an authoritarian state that allows little room for dissent. What remains of it today?

By challenging him, Prigozhin — the man who does the dirty work, the mercenary leader and mastermind behind troll farms pushing disinformation — showed that the emperor had no clothes. Juggling between Wagner, the Chechens and other factions within his own army, Putin has lost control.

This vulnerability adds to his failures during the war in Ukraine and reveals a vulnerable Putin, forced to barricade himself in the Kremlin — not against NATO, but against his own creation. It will leave scars, perhaps even fatal ones.

\u200bA screenshot of a video depicting Yevgeny Prigozhin during the rebellion.

A screenshot of a video depicting Yevgeny Prigozhin during the rebellion.

Pool /Wagner Group/Zuma

What it means for Ukraine

What impact does all this have on the war in Ukraine? That is the third lesson: for a moment, Ukrainians believed that a miracle had arrived, that a civil war in Moscow would divert the Russian army elsewhere. That was not the case.

Still, the impact of this crisis on the military remains elusive. What has become of Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of General Staff Valery Gerasimov, who have been largely unseen? What is the impact of Prigozhin's accusations, claiming that it was not the threat from NATO that triggered the invasion of Ukraine, but rather the generals' greed?

It's too early to tell, but all this confirms, once again, that this war was the most serious mistake of Putin's reign, and it reinforces the West's decision to support Ukraine.

What happened this past weekend was Russia's worst crisis in 30 years, and it is far from over.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Americans Don't Understand Biden — And Biden Doesn't Trust Netanyahu

Challenged back home, U.S. President Joe Biden has just published an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he outlines a future for the Palestinian territories that's different from the one envisaged by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and threatens violent settlers in the West Bank with sanctions. But where are the teeth?

Photo of ​U.S. President Joe Biden walking toward the left of the image as he leaves the White House on Nov. 14

U.S. President Joe Biden leaving the White House on Nov. 14

Pierre Haski


PARIS — Joe Biden has a problem, and then some.

The first is that a large proportion of Americans don't understand his policy of support for Israel and his refusal to call for a ceasefire. This is particularly true among young people, with 70% of 18-34 year-olds saying they disagree with the way he has been handling the conflict.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

The second problem is that the president of the United States does not trust Benjamin Netanyahu, the man leading Israel at such a crucial time. He already didn't trust him before October 7, and he is wary of his ideas for the post-war period in the Palestinian territories.

Thus unable to satisfy his opponents on the ceasefire question (he wants to give the Israeli army a chance to destroy Hamas's infrastructure in Gaza), Joe Biden has published an op-ed in the Washington Post to show his disgruntled constituents that he won't let Netanyahu dictate the agenda, and perhaps to gain time.

For the first time, the American president threatens to impose sanctions against violent settlers in the occupied West Bank. This is a new development, after years of ceremonial condemnation, to no avail, of Israel's expanding colonization efforts, often through violence.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest