When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Russia's Vladimir Putin and Egypt's Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Cairo on Feb. 10
Russia's Vladimir Putin and Egypt's Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Cairo on Feb. 10
Timothy E. Kaldas

CAIRO — Much has been made about Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Cairo. There has been speculation since the 2013 coup that Egypt's ruler Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has been contemplating a shift in alliances toward Russia. This has been in response to the popular belief in Egypt, propagated by the regime and its media supporters, that the United States had backed the Muslim Brotherhood and that Washington is conspiring with the now-banned organization in its efforts to destabilize Sisi's regime.

The Egyptian government has gone out of its way to play up the significance of Putin's visit. The Cairo streets were lined with posters depicting the Russian president, welcoming him in English, Arabic and Russian. The flagship state newspaper ran a massive spread the day before the Russian leader's arrival declaring him a "hero of this era," while covering the front page with photos of Putin, including one of the Russian president bare-chested.

But in the end, the theatrics of a presidential visit can't mitigate the strategic limitations of relations between Moscow and Cairo. Ironically, the United States is far from the most significant barrier to more robust ties between the two governments. It is in fact Sisi's backers in the Arabian Gulf who pose the most significant challenge to deepening the strategic relationship between the two strongmen.

Putin's policies in the Middle East stand diametrically opposed to the priorities of the Gulf monarchies who finance Sisi and his regime. While the Gulf has been adamant that the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad must fall (arguably even more so than the Americans), Putin has provided Assad with large shipments of arms helping to fuel his brutal repression of the uprising against him. Russia's strategic ties to Syria stretch back decades, and its naval base in Tartus is an important strategic asset to the Russian navy.

The Gulf has been leery of Iran's suspected nuclear ambitions and has supported robust pressure on the Islamic Republic to prevent it from being able to produce nuclear weapons. But Russia has advocated a softer and more forgiving approach to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program.

In terms of economics, the Gulf, through OPEC and led by Saudi Arabia, has kept oil supplies in the global market high, affecting a dramatic collapse in the price of oil in an effort to price out new high-cost producers and reserve greater market share for low-cost producers. But Russia needs the price of oil to hover around $100 a barrel for the country's budget to break even. The current per-barrel price is half that.

Moreover, due to an array of economic problems currently plaguing Moscow, Putin is not in a position to deliver any largesse to curry favor in Cairo. The Russian economy is expected to contract by 4% this year, largely due to the drop in energy prices coupled with the impact of Western sanctions on Russian banks.

All talk, no walk

There has been talk of an agreement to conduct bilateral trade in domestic currencies rather than the international standard of trading in U.S. dollars. Again, this is more symbolic than it is significant. Trade between the two countries is fairly limited, and the potential new agreement through which Egypt would purchase gas from Russia would only increase the trade imbalance in Russia's favor more. Ironically, this new bilateral currency agreement would thus penalize Russia more than Egypt, as Russian businesses would be saddled with a disproportionately large stock of Egyptian pounds, which can't be traded or used outside of Egypt.

Neither currency is terribly reliable, which is why international trade often depends on the dollar. The Egyptian pound is undergoing deliberate devaluation while the Russian ruble has been highly unstable over the last few months, losing nearly half its value. While both governments would like to loosen their dependence on the dollar, there are a number of practical reasons why both Egyptian and Russian businesses would not be thrilled with this currency deal.

Putin's visit offered both leaders an opportunity to exaggerate their importance. For Sisi, it was an opportunity to play host to a prominent world leader and to suggest to supporters that his regime is bringing Egypt to a more prominent place in world politics. It also allowed Sisi to further fuel speculation that he was contemplating and prepared for a shift toward Russia, which is widely understood in Egypt to imply greater independence for the Egyptian government.

Putin was given the opportunity to thumb his nose at Washington by securing a warmer welcome by America's longtime ally than any U.S. officials have seen in quite some time. At the moment, Putin believes the United States and Western Europe are interfering in his Eastern Europe sphere of influence, and so this was an opportunity for him to return the favor, in a sense.

In all likelihood, however, Washington will dismiss this publicity stunt in much the same way it has learned to ignore the series of other media spectacles that have emanated from Cairo over the past couple of years. In the end, America's strategic interests in Egypt are not seriously affected by the media-manufactured turmoil between the two countries. Military and intelligence cooperation are largely intact and, despite Washington's public statements criticizing repression in Egypt, it's doubtful that such cooperation will change.

Both Washington and Cairo have media messaging designed to appease their respective publics and so, while the United States continues its decades-long charade of expressing concern over human rights violations, its policy of ignoring such violations in practice will also continue. While it may be regrettable, democracy and human rights have virtually never figured prominently in U.S. foreign policy priorities.

What Egypt and Russia do have in common is that their economic problems severely limit their strategic options vis-a-vis one another. In the end, Egypt can't afford to go without Gulf funding, and Russia cannot afford to replace it.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Why Fast-Tracking Ukraine's NATO Entry Is Such A Bad Idea

Ukraine's President Zelensky should not be putting pressure for NATO membership now. It raises the risk of a wider war, and the focus should be on continuing arms deliveries from the West. After all, peace will be decided on the battlefield.

American soldiers from the U.S. army during a training exercise in Grafenwoehr, Germany

Christoph B. Schiltz

-OpEd-

Nine NATO member states from Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans are now putting pressure on the military alliance to welcome Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been calling for "accelerated accession."

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

As understandable as it is that his country wants to join a strong defensive military alliance like NATO, the timing is wrong. Of course, we must acknowledge the Ukrainian people's heroic fight for survival. But Zelensky must be careful not to overstretch the West's willingness to support him.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ