Advice for Kyiv

Politicians in Moscow, as well as Washington, London, Paris and Berlin, would all have done well to heed Henry Kissinger’s call for leaders on all sides to focus on concrete outcomes rather than posturing. He suggested that Ukraine should give up its ambitions of NATO membership, and reach a compromise with Russia. But this advice was ignored.

No one will "win" this war.

Faced with the current devastation in Ukraine, we must offer all possible help to the country, except for measures that would risk setting off a Third World War. Perhaps the best way we can help is to offer constructive ideas about Ukraine’s place on the world stage, ideas that are acceptable to all sides and offer the possibility of long-term peace in the region.

It’s encouraging to see media reports that French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Chinese President Xi Jinping are seeking to work together to find a political solution to the Ukraine crisis. For that to happen, all those involved need to recognize that – unless we are prepared to see thousands of deaths and widespread destruction – it is impossible for the war in Ukraine to be “won” in a military sense.

However, even after a “victory,” peace would be a political impossibility, given the far-reaching, long-lasting global economic and political devastation that will inevitably result from the war.

If the search for a political solution is to be more than just empty words, we must ask: what structures need to be in place for Ukraine to remain a free, democratic society and a sovereign state, but at the same time maintain peaceful relations with Russia and other neighboring countries?

The Swiss solution

Given Ukraine’s ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious diversity, it could take the Swiss constitution as a model. Over centuries, Switzerland found a way to successfully develop its democracy in which decisions are made at a local level, a society built on mutual respect for the different cultures, ethnicities and languages in the population.

Switzerland’s special situation means it is committed to military neutrality, but that does not mean it has had to compromise its political values.

If Ukraine were to emulate the Swiss model and structure itself as a neutral, multilingual state divided into cantons, that could allow it to enjoy better relations with both Russia and the European Union, both politically and economically.

The Russian-speaking Donbas region could be treated as an autonomous canton. It remains to be seen whether negotiations could succeed in reversing the annexation of Crimea. However, if all sides acknowledge the potential of cross-border economic and political cooperation, the Crimea question could become less important, and we may be able to find a pragmatic solution.

Avoid overreach

If Ukraine adopted this approach, it’s unlikely that the country would be able to join the European Union in the future, as the EU would be protective of its own interests and wary of overreaching itself. However, the EU, Ukraine and Russia could agree on a free-trade zone, which would bring economic benefits for all sides.

This means letting go of the anachronistic, nationalistic desire for power.

Of course, it would take courage and determination for Ukraine to seek to achieve peace through adopting a “Swiss constitution,” as it means letting go of the anachronistic, nationalistic desire for power. It would require a willingness to compromise and forego ultimatums.

For the closely related, peace-loving people of Ukraine and Russia, the Swiss model could offer a path to a promising future in which Ukraine could fulfill its rich cultural and economic potential as it never has before, bringing advantages for the country itself and for the wider world.