When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Sources

Trump May Be The Wake-up Call Mexico Needs

But for some, politicians' rising calls for unity ring hollow.

Can Pena get a popular boost?
Can Pena get a popular boost?
Luis Rubio

-OpEd-

MEXICO CITY — Things have gone from bad to worse for the Mexican government. And nobody seems able to stop the downward spiral.

It doesn't help that the country's various political parties — from the conservative National Action Party (PAN) to the socialist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), populist National Regeneration Movement (MORENA) and a motley lot of independents — have busily tried to capitalize on this crisis, with little regard for the consequences of their actions.

Suddenly, though, a bright light has appeared. An unlikely beacon of hope — Donald J. Trump! Thanks to the new U.S. president, Mexico's feuding parties now have a common cause, or at least a shared enemy. Unity suddenly acquires cosmic proportions: We are all migrants, all patriots, all good people! Anything but Mexico's harsh realities.

Difficult times demand unity and in that context, President Enrique Peña Nieto's declarations regarding Trump have been spot on. Yet no amount of presidential posturing will erase years of institutional disdain toward the people or prevent political opponents like MORENA's Andrés Manuel López Obrador from trying to score points with rival calls for unity.

Mexican citizens are cautious by experience, and versed enough in politics to distinguish between the interested and disinterested. For them, these calls to unity ring hollow, distant and downright false. The politicians seem to care less about Mexico's pending fate than they do about grabbing the political spotlight now so as to secure power later.

A sinking ship

Some motr hard proof of that was the inability of the organizers of a massive march in Mexico City, on Feb. 12, to agree on their aims.

The problem with calls to unity is that they excite nobody when they are against something. People want answers and solutions, not cheap condemnations. If people are to unite, it should at least in favor of something better.

The migrants who live in fear in the United States and their families back here in Mexico do not want marches and protests, though they might join one to help change the country. The president, on the other hand, has good reason to join the parade — to cover up his own dismal ratings. But nothing can hide the ugly fact that in spite of the outside threat to their lives, Mexicans are angrier with their own government than with Trump.

It was no accident that so many of the organizations set to join last month's march decided, in the end, to opt out. Nobody wants to board a sinking ship carrying the government and many of those who believed at some point that its reforms could work.

A few tweets by Trump unmasked our weaknesses

For almost half a century, Mexicans have been living and waiting for a transformation that could free the country of the shackles of the past. During that time, many efforts were made to reform aspects of the country's political and economic life. But none sought to lay out the bases of a different future or launch the country into the 21st century.

Economic reforms created certain free spaces that have given us extraordinary relief, without providing a comprehensive solution. Political and electoral reforms managed to assuage opposition groups and include them in the system of perks and privileges created by the governing Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). So many everyday workers, however, had to seek jobs abroad because opportunities here are absent. These have been decades devoted always to dealing with the crisis at hand: patching up holes and cleaning wounds that will not heal.

It took just a few tweets by Trump to unmask the country and reveal weaknesses. But if all you can do in response is to indignantly wrap yourself in the national flag, well, that's just bravado. People aren't sick and tired for nothing, and problems will not be solved, as López Obrador suggests, by returning to some idyllic, simple past of ours. Urging a "new nation-building project" may sound great, but it flies in the face of the world we live in now.

The country certainly must change. The question, though, is how. Where should Mexico be heading? Calls to unity are only of interest to those interested in — and with vested interests in — the past. These are the undying fans of nationalism, what George Orwell described as "power-hunger tempered by self-deception."

Trump has yanked us out of our comfort zone and is forcing us to choose. We either take a firm step into the 21st century or accept more deterioration. If we choose the latter, we can at least be sure of our direction: downward. And no one should believe they can save their own skin by jumping ship — or that the state of the country can't actually get worse.

History since the Russian Revolution has shown just how bad things can get in a country. What we need today is Mexicans coming together to build a collective future, not calls to unity from a privileged position on a sinking cruise ship.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

LGBTQ Plus

New Study Finds High Levels Of Anti-LGBTQ+ Discrimination In Buddhism

We tend to think of Buddhism as a religion devoid of commandments, and therefore generally more accepting than others. The author, an Australian researcher — and "genderqueer, non-binary Buddhist" themself — suggests that it is far from being the case.

Photo of a Buddhist monk in a Cambodia temple, walking away from the camera

Some Buddhist spaces can be highly heteronormative and show lack of understanding toward the LGBTQ+ community

Stephen Kerry

More than half of Australia’s LGBTQIA+ Buddhists feel reluctant to “come out” to their Buddhist communities and nearly one in six have been told directly that being LGBTQIA+ isn’t in keeping with the Buddha’s teachings.

These are some of the findings from my research looking at the experiences of LGBTQIA+ Buddhists in Australia.

✉️ You can receive our LGBTQ+ International roundup every week directly in your inbox. Subscribe here.

I’m a genderqueer, non-binary Buddhist myself and I was curious about others’ experiences in Australia since there has been no research done on our community before. So, in 2020, I surveyed 82 LGBTQIA+ Buddhists and have since followed this up with 29 face-to-face interviews.

Some people may think Buddhism would be quite accepting of LGBTQIA+ people. There are, after all, no religious laws, commandments or punishments in Buddhism. My research indicates, however, this is not always true.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest