When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Toulouse To Manchester: Our Children's Blood, Our Own Denial

At a vigil in Manchester
At a vigil in Manchester


PARIS — At first, there is that horrific sensation like something pushing on your chest with the tears that swell as we imagine the parents trying to reach their children and nobody answering on the other end of the line where a massacre has been committed. Then, there is the anger that becomes a feeling of powerlessness in the knowledge that some monsters, somewhere, will rejoice at this act of evil. But once emotions have passed, after the ceremonies and the minutes of silence, there will remain our collective duty to ask ourselves what we can do.

Nobody can claim they can stop all attacks. In France, intelligence services have learned a lot and the current state of emergency has given them the means to move faster. But the tragedy in Manchester forces us to face the same standing truth.

First, as the investigations on the people close to the suicide bomber Salman Abedi has shown, Libya is now a deadly peril for Europe. The French military has been warning for months that a significant number of senior ISIS members fleeing the allied offensive on Mosul and Raqqa were heading toward Libya, via Turkey. Abedi himself traveled through Turkey. Didier François, a French reporter in the region, recently told radio station Europe 1, "We're evidently witnessing a transfer in know-how, coming out of Iraq and Syria." This new flashpoint allows future commandos to mingle with the flow of desperate migrants thrown onto the Mediterranean by human traffickers.

Second, the history of our own jihadists in France shows that like Salman Abedi, a large part of them were born on European soil and that they've learned to hate who we are in our very own schools. And yet, at no time was this hate met with any kind of appropriate response. What can you say about a young man who attempts to go to Syria twice and who three judges decided to release because he promised that, of course, he'd abandoned his plans and go look for a job? Turns out this young man eventually slit the throat of an 86-year-old priest last July in a small town northwest of Paris. It seems some magistrates still haven't grasped the threat our police officers and soldiers are battling against.

Multiculturalism won't save us from their hatred

But more broadly, what we're lacking is not another piece of anti-terror legislation but an intellectual and moral rearmament of our institutions, of every citizen regardless of their origin or religion, so we can all put up a united front against this hatred.

Finally, something we'll never repeat often enough and that each attack, be it in Britain, Sweden or Germany, reminds us is that multiculturalism won't save us from their hatred. A jihadist who blows himself up in the middle of a group of teenage girls after a concert is not protesting against some form of discrimination. The same goes for the someone who, in cold blood, shoots children at point-blank range because they're Jewish as happened in 2012 in the southern French city of Toulouse. And yet Swiss-born intellectual Tariq Ramadan would write, one week later that the attacker, Mohamed Merah, was "a victim of a system that had already sentenced him."

The jihadist that struck in Manchester was living in a society that tolerates the full veil and that sees the French brand of secularism, laïcité, as incomprehensible. We can try and understand the multiple factors that fuel the frustrations of young men out for revenge. Still, should we go as far as the new French president Emmanuel Macron, who, in 2015, was speaking about the "breeding-ground" that favors such acts and what part might be "our responsibility"? Without denying that there is discrimination, should we really be convincing young people in this country that their failures can solely be explained by the fact that they're being mistreated by the institutions? If there's any breeding-ground that favors terror attacks, you need look no further.

We must, of course, become aware of our own flaws and gaps. We must stop believing we can get away with destabilizing countries and entire regions of the world for the sake of muddled interests. We must stop thinking it is inconsequential to let rich allies infiltrate our neighborhoods, as well as entire regions of Africa, with a fundamentalism and totalitarian brand of Islam. We must stop considering soldiers pervaded with ideology as lost and neglected children. We must stop reducing our civilizational model to its most sordid dimension and then be surprised that it doesn't interest our youth, destined to look elsewhere for motivations to live and causes to die for. We must, finally, stop telling ourselves every time that we need to "get used" to terrorism, which sounds like the worst kind of fatalism.

In short, we must stop lying to ourselves. To feed our reflections and our choices, we must always bear in mind, always remember, that our priority is to protect our children and see them grow up in a world where they won't have to fear that the child sitting next to them at school might wind up killing them one day.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


The Trudeau-Modi Row Reveals Growing Right-Wing Bent Of India's Diaspora

Western governments will not be oblivious to the growing right-wing activism among the diaspora and the efforts of the BJP and Narendra Modi's government to harness that energy for political support and stave off criticism of India.

The Trudeau-Modi Row Reveals Growing Right-Wing Bent Of India's Diaspora

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G20 Summit in New Delhi on Sept. 9

Sushil Aaron


NEW DELHICanadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has brought Narendra Modi’s exuberant post-G20 atmospherics to a halt by alleging in parliament that agents of the Indian government were involved in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian national, in June this year.

“Any involvement of a foreign government in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of our sovereignty,” Trudeau said. The Canadian foreign ministry subsequently expelled an Indian diplomat, who was identified as the head of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), India’s foreign intelligence agency, in Canada. [On Thursday, India retaliated through its visa processing center in Canada, which suspended services until further notice over “operational reasons.”]

Trudeau’s announcement was immediately picked up by the international media and generated quite a ripple across social media. This is big because the Canadians have accused the Indian government – not any private vigilante group or organisation – of murder in a foreign land.

Trudeau and Canadian state services seem to have taken this as seriously as the UK did when the Russian émigré Alexander Litvinenko was killed, allegedly on orders of the Kremlin. It is extraordinarily rare for a Western democracy to expel a diplomat from another democracy on these grounds.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest