When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
eyes on the U.S.

The Sinking Ship That Is Obama's America

Obama at work
Obama at work
Hubert Wetzel


At the moment when the Titanic struck the iceberg, the ship’s captain was not on the bridge. Edward Smith had gone below deck to bed. Both before and after the collision, the captain proved himself to be worse than useless, issuing confused orders and failing to take control of the evacuation. He let the ship sail at full speed through the iceberg-riddled North Atlantic Ocean. Then while his ship was sinking, he made his sole useful contribution to the rescue efforts, sending an emergency signal out into the night.

Barack Obama is certainly not the most to blame for Washington’s current drama, but the President does bear a sizeable portion of the guilt for allowing the U.S. government to founder. Although the recent agreement means that America will avoid colliding with the debt ceiling and becoming insolvent, the catastrophe has been delayed rather than prevented. The United States is indeed sailing through perilous waters.

Until now, Obama’s opponents have acted so madly that his own mistakes have not been noticeable. It’s easy to play the reasonable, composed politician when you’re up against blockheaded, self-righteous nihilists like the Tea Party. It’s easy to refuse all negotiations when the other side is acting like a wild bunch of blackmailers. Obama has played the PR game well, and situated himself firmly on the moral high ground. According to polls, he is winning the public-image contest hands down. But gaining popularity should not be the President’s top priority.

Posturing rather than leadership

Obama’s task is to govern America. It is the President, and not some wild backbenchers, who is responsible for ensuring that the country continues to function. He may well wish that the Constitution did not give Congress the right to withhold the government’s finances, but that has been the case since 1788 and it is not going to change any time soon.

Obama did not steer his country into dangerous waters but he has done shockingly little to prevent it from sinking amid the breakdown in negotiations in Washington. Over the last few weeks, as the dispute about the national budget and the debt ceiling raged, the public has heard two things from Obama: disparaging comments about his political opponents, and a promise never to negotiate with them.

While his criticisms may have been justified, they were not conducive to finding a solution. Obama was not prepared to make the slightest concession or stoop to negotiating with the Republicans. All the meetings in the White House and long telephone conversations with the opposition leaders were just for show.

Obama wanted a battle and he wanted to see his opponents concede defeat. He was not interested in coming to an agreement. Therefore we may be justified in saying that Captain Obama saw the iceberg on the horizon. He went below deck and left the rudder in the hands of a few clumsy stokers. Then, after the collision, he sent out an SOS.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


New Study Finds High Levels Of Anti-LGBTQ+ Discrimination In Buddhism

We tend to think of Buddhism as a religion devoid of commandments, and therefore generally more accepting than others. The author, an Australian researcher — and "genderqueer, non-binary Buddhist" themself — suggests that it is far from being the case.

Photo of a Buddhist monk in a Cambodia temple, walking away from the camera

Some Buddhist spaces can be highly heteronormative and show lack of understanding toward the LGBTQ+ community

Stephen Kerry

More than half of Australia’s LGBTQIA+ Buddhists feel reluctant to “come out” to their Buddhist communities and nearly one in six have been told directly that being LGBTQIA+ isn’t in keeping with the Buddha’s teachings.

These are some of the findings from my research looking at the experiences of LGBTQIA+ Buddhists in Australia.

✉️ You can receive our LGBTQ+ International roundup every week directly in your inbox. Subscribe here.

I’m a genderqueer, non-binary Buddhist myself and I was curious about others’ experiences in Australia since there has been no research done on our community before. So, in 2020, I surveyed 82 LGBTQIA+ Buddhists and have since followed this up with 29 face-to-face interviews.

Some people may think Buddhism would be quite accepting of LGBTQIA+ people. There are, after all, no religious laws, commandments or punishments in Buddhism. My research indicates, however, this is not always true.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest