When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Enjoy unlimited access to quality journalism.

Limited time offer

Get your 30-day free trial!
InterNations -Your expat community
Obama at work
Obama at work
Hubert Wetzel

-OpEd-

At the moment when the Titanic struck the iceberg, the ship’s captain was not on the bridge. Edward Smith had gone below deck to bed. Both before and after the collision, the captain proved himself to be worse than useless, issuing confused orders and failing to take control of the evacuation. He let the ship sail at full speed through the iceberg-riddled North Atlantic Ocean. Then while his ship was sinking, he made his sole useful contribution to the rescue efforts, sending an emergency signal out into the night.

Barack Obama is certainly not the most to blame for Washington’s current drama, but the President does bear a sizeable portion of the guilt for allowing the U.S. government to founder. Although the recent agreement means that America will avoid colliding with the debt ceiling and becoming insolvent, the catastrophe has been delayed rather than prevented. The United States is indeed sailing through perilous waters.

Until now, Obama’s opponents have acted so madly that his own mistakes have not been noticeable. It’s easy to play the reasonable, composed politician when you’re up against blockheaded, self-righteous nihilists like the Tea Party. It’s easy to refuse all negotiations when the other side is acting like a wild bunch of blackmailers. Obama has played the PR game well, and situated himself firmly on the moral high ground. According to polls, he is winning the public-image contest hands down. But gaining popularity should not be the President’s top priority.

Posturing rather than leadership

Obama’s task is to govern America. It is the President, and not some wild backbenchers, who is responsible for ensuring that the country continues to function. He may well wish that the Constitution did not give Congress the right to withhold the government’s finances, but that has been the case since 1788 and it is not going to change any time soon.

Obama did not steer his country into dangerous waters but he has done shockingly little to prevent it from sinking amid the breakdown in negotiations in Washington. Over the last few weeks, as the dispute about the national budget and the debt ceiling raged, the public has heard two things from Obama: disparaging comments about his political opponents, and a promise never to negotiate with them.

While his criticisms may have been justified, they were not conducive to finding a solution. Obama was not prepared to make the slightest concession or stoop to negotiating with the Republicans. All the meetings in the White House and long telephone conversations with the opposition leaders were just for show.

Obama wanted a battle and he wanted to see his opponents concede defeat. He was not interested in coming to an agreement. Therefore we may be justified in saying that Captain Obama saw the iceberg on the horizon. He went below deck and left the rudder in the hands of a few clumsy stokers. Then, after the collision, he sent out an SOS.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in
Green

Good COP, Bad COP? How Sharm El-Sheik Failed On The Planet's Big Question

The week-long climate summit in Egypt managed to a backsliding that looked possible at some point, it still failed to deliver on significant change to reverse the effects of global warming.

Photo of a potted tree lying overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

A potted tree lies overturned on the ground in Sharm el-Sheikh as the COP27 summit concludes.

Matt McDonald*

For 30 years, developing nations have fought to establish an international fund to pay for the “loss and damage” they suffer as a result of climate change. As the COP27 climate summit in Egypt wrapped up over the weekend, they finally succeeded.

While it’s a historic moment, the agreement of loss and damage financing left many details yet to be sorted out. What’s more, many critics have lamented the overall outcome of COP27, saying it falls well short of a sufficient response to the climate crisis. As Alok Sharma, president of COP26 in Glasgow, noted:

"Friends, I said in Glasgow that the pulse of 1.5 °C was weak. Unfortunately it remains on life support."

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in

The latest

InterNations