TURIN - Perhaps we deserve Berlusconi and his lies. Not the Italians, maybe, given as a single citizen is largely powerless in the face of a political system. But the media, especially the television, definitely does deserve him.
A brief explanation is required: For the last three weeks, every time I turn on the television and see Berlusconi, invariably he insists that he, truly, has always kept his promises. He reads the clauses from his “Contract with the Italians” from 2001 and he reels off a flurry of “facts.” He reads his electoral manifesto from 2008 and again, he praises himself for respecting all the commitments that he's made.
It doesn’t surprise me, because we’re used to the man. But as for the presenters of the television programs, where are their brains when they hear such statements? Do they really believe that we’re looking at free expression of opinions and assessment? Have they never seen a TV debate or talk show from other countries? Do they not know that in a normal European country, like Germany, the UK or France, a politician could never ever blatantly lie about the facts because the show's host would immediately call him out on it, and the following day the press would shred him to pieces?
Let me be clear, I am not referring to secondary commitments here, or to vague and general promises from politicians, “we’ll reform this, we’ll change that, we’ll make that a priority,” and so on. No, I am referring to a precise and important thing, a task that Berlusconi repeatedly and solemnly promised as the centerpiece of his center-right agenda but was not done: the abolishment of the IRAP regional small-business tax, and the reduction of the maximum personal income tax rate to 33%. It was, and still is, essential to businesses and households; it has been promised by Berlusconi dozens of times -- but nothing has been done.
How is it possible that nobody who interviews him, when they hear that he kept all of his promises, bursts into laughter? Why don’t they feel the duty to remind him of these hard facts? How do you go on with the questions if the interviewee can deny the evidence? But above all: do you just not see that the past and future are intricately connected, that he cannot be credible about the future if he can’t admit the truth about the past? When great political leaders ask the electorate to vote for them a second time, they usually get elected again because they communicate the message that there is more work to be done. Last year, that is what Barack Obama did, and what Tony Blair had done in his day. But Berlusconi?
Taking the dream with him
End of the outburst. I would like to make it clear that this doesn’t apply to some of the current proposals of his party, some of which I even find meaningful and valuable. My utter exhaustion for Berlusconi’s chatter, my impatience with the media who submit to him, indeed derive from the “free market revolution” that has been promised so many times but never fulfilled. It’s still one of the few good ideas in circulation but, unfortunately, no major political force embodies it today. In short, I think the real criticism of Berlusconi shouldn’t be that he doesn’t have ideas, but that he has betrayed them -- or better still, betrayed the very core of his political program.
That’s why, with the approaching elections, I’m more and more puzzled. I’m among those who think it’s time to say goodbye once and for all to the politics of Berlusconi Berlusconismo, if only because the feeling of continuously being taken for a ride is extremely unpleasant. The mere presence of Berlusconi on the political scene is enough to poison the atmosphere; and he makes the left seem more absurd than it would be otherwise.
At the same time, however, I think that the departure of Berlusconi, and it will be soon, is being driven by a series of false beliefs. The belief, for example, that removing Berlusconi would remove Italy’s problems, or the belief that the technical government of Mario Monti should have been stopped a long time ago. Above all, what worries me is the belief that Italy’s ailment stems from the same political area, and that the enormous expansion of government spending and the debt are a product of progressive policies. A belief that if the power shifts to the left, the problems will all be solved.
No, I do not think that it will be like that. Unfortunately, when he leaves the scene, Berlusconi may end up taking with him the entire culture of the right that -- albeit timidly -- really gave the image of a liberal revolution with a less intrusive state that finally turned the Italians from subjects into citizens.
There was a time, recently, when it seemed that the idea might have some chance, and that the crisis could herald the birth of, if not a convinced free-market political force, at least political culture with that inspiration. The forces and the people were there, but it lacked something concrete. The wires got crossed. So, today, the liberal-minded, free-market culture survives as a minority, just like the Christians in the catacombs, and has no chance of representation in Parliament.
We can only hope that those, like me, who think that these ideas absolutely cannot emerge, are wrong, and that hope can be be restored to a country that has lost the ability to long for something better.
"Xi Jinping Thought" ideas on socialism have been spreading across the country since 2017. But now, Beijing is going one step further by making them part of the curriculum, from the elementary level all the way up to university.
BEIJING — It's important to strengthen the "determination to listen to and follow the party." Also, teaching materials should "cultivate patriotic feelings." So say the new guidelines issued by the Chinese Ministry of Education.
The goal is to help Chinese students develop more "Marxist beliefs," and for that, the government wants its national curriculum to include "Xi Jinping Thought," the ideas, namely, of China's current leader.
Xi Jinping has been the head of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for almost 10 years. In 2017, at a party convention, he presented a doctrine in the most riveting of party prose: "Xi Jinping's ideas of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new age."
Behind this word jam is a plan to consolidate the power of the nation, the party and Xi himself. In other words, to make China great again!
Communist curriculum replaces global subjects
This doctrine has sent shockwaves through China since 2017. It's been echoed in newspapers, on TV, and screamed from posters and banners hung in many cities. But now, the People's Republic is going one step further: It's bringing "Xi Jinping Thought" into the schools.
Starting in September, the country's 300 million students have had to study the doctrine, from elementary school into university. And in some cities, even that doesn't seem to be enough. Shanghai announced that its students from third to fifth grade would only take final exams in mathematics and Chinese, de facto deleting English as an examination subject. Beijing, in the meantime, announced that it would ban the use of unauthorized foreign textbooks in elementary and middle schools.
But how does a country that enchants its youth with socialist ideology and personality cults rise to become a world power? Isn't giving up English as a global language the quickest way into isolation?
The educational reform comes at a time when Beijing is brutally disciplining many areas of public life, from tech giants to the entertainment industry. It has made it difficult for Chinese technology companies to go public abroad, and some media have reported that a blanket ban on IPOs in the United States is on the cards in the next few years.
Targeting pop culture
The regime is also taking massive action against the entertainment industry. Popstar Kris Wu was arrested on charges of rape. Movies and TV series starring actor Zhao Wei have started to disappear from Chinese streaming platforms. The reason is unclear.
What the developments do show is that China is attempting to decouple from the West with increasing insistence. Beijing wants to protect its youth from Western excesses, from celebrity worship, super wealth and moral decline.
A nationalist blogger recently called for a "profound change in the economy, finance, culture and politics," a "revolution" and a "return from the capitalists to the masses." Party media shared the text on their websites. It appears the analysis caused more than a few nods in the party headquarters.
Dictatorships are always afraid of pluralism.
Caspar Welbergen, managing director of the Education Network China, an initiative that aims to intensify school exchanges between Germany and China, says that against this background, the curriculum reform is not surprising.
"The emphasis on 'Xi Jinping Thought' is being used in all areas of society," he says. "It is almost logical that China is now also using it in the education system."
Needless to say, the doctrine doesn't make student exchanges with China any easier.
Dictatorships are always afraid of color, pluralism and independent thinking citizens. And yet, Kristin Kupfer, a Sinology professor at the University of Trier, suggests that ideologically charged school lessons should not be interpreted necessarily as a sign of weakness of the CCP.
From the point of view of a totalitarian regime, she explains, this can also be interpreted as a signal of strength. "It remains to be seen whether the Chinese leadership can implement this so thoroughly," Kupfer adds. "Initial reactions from teachers and parents on social media show that such a widespread attempt to control opinion has raised fears and discontent in the population."
- In China's Crackdown On Religions, Buddhism Gets A Pass ... ›
- Strait Talk: China Invading Taiwan Is Mostly Just A Matter Of Time ... ›
- Why Hong Kong Means So Much To Xi Jinping - Worldcrunch ›