When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Ideas

What Exactly Does Pope Francis Think About The War In Ukraine?

Seven months after Russia’s invasion, the Pope finally called on Vladimir Putin directly to stop the war. But just days earlier, Francis had offered an elaborate theory on the causes of the war, which he blamed on competing “imperialisms” of Russia and the West, and the need to have wars to sell weapons.

Photo of Pope Francis sitting in church in Rome

Pope Francis in Rome

Jeff Israely

-Analysis-

Pope Francis has not been particularly popular in Ukraine since the war began in February. Unlike other Western leaders, the pope didn’t condemn Vladimir Putin in the days and weeks after the invasion, largely limiting his remarks about the war to prayers for the victims and universal calls for peace.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

A Ukrainian colleague was furious that Francis wasn’t calling Putin out for his invasion. Having covered the Vatican for more than a decade in my prior job, I tried to explain that papal diplomacy tends not to point fingers or name names, partly in their hope of leaving church channels open for possible future negotiations.

Well, on Sunday, Francis finally pointed his finger at Putin, in what was perhaps his strongest call to date to stop the war. “My appeal goes above all to the president of the Russian Federation, begging him to stop this spiral of violence and death, even out of love for his own people,” the pope said.

In the same breath, he also urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to be open to negotiations. The pope also warned against the rising threat of the use of nuclear weapons. This is what popes do in times of war: They call for peace and try to save lives, hoping the message seeps into the ears and hearts of political leaders and public opinion.

Still, there are other messages that Francis has been spreading about the war that are not so obvious.


Indeed, just three days before his latest call for peace in St. Peter’s Square, a rather stunning exchange appeared in the Jesuit magazine La Civiltà Cattolica where the pope shared his view on the causes of the war with priests gathered during his recent visit to Kazakhstan.

Good guys, bad guys

In the exchange, the pope warned against “simplistic” thinking about the war, as if it were a "cowboy movie where there are good guys and bad guys." Instead, he said, it was important “to investigate the dynamics” that caused the war, which he summed up as “imperialisms in conflict.”

The pontiff blamed the war on the competition between rival imperial powers.

Rather than focusing on Russia’s decision to invade its neighbor, the pontiff blamed the war on the competition between rival imperial powers, declaring that when they "feel threatened and in decline, the imperialisms react thinking that the solution is to wage a war […] and also to sell and test weapons.”

By any reading, we must assume that said "imperialisms" (plural) in decline are Russia and the U.S.-led West. It is a view of the war that appears to divide blame between the two, offering an alibi to Putin and other apologists of the invasion at a moment when Russia has just annexed four regions in southern and eastern Ukraine.

Putin loves to cite Western imperialism too

At Friday’s annexation ceremony at the Kremlin, Putin painted a picture of Russia defending itself against Western imperialism, addressing the “Kyiv authorities and their real masters in the West.”

The Russian leader offered a take on history that the Argentine-born pope might recognize: “The West began its colonial policy back in the Middle Ages,” Putin declared. “For the sake of land and resources, they hunted people like animals.”

Then speaking specifically of the United States, he added: “Even today, they actually occupy Germany, Japan, South Korea, and other countries, and at the same time cynically call them allies of equal standing. The dictatorship of the Western elites is directed against all societies, including the peoples of the Western countries themselves. This is a challenge to all.”

Last spring, when he was criticized for his reaction to the war, Francis made a point of declaring that he was “not pro-Putin!,” which his comments Sunday do well to confirm.

\u200bPope Francis in front of a Ukrainian flag on Vatican City

Pope Francis in Vatican City on Aug. 24

Grzegorz Galazka/Mondadori Portfolio/ZUMA

False equivalencies

Yet his ideas about the causes of the war, and the false equivalencies of blame, risk serving the storyline of the Kremlin. They are an expression of a long-standing tendency in parts of the world, including the pope’s native Argentina, to see U.S. power as the driving explanation for virtually everything that goes wrong in the world.

Yes, U.S. and Western imperialism exists, and has caused far too much suffering over the years, with the war in Iraq as only the most obvious example. And yes, the military-industrial complex is also real, and no doubt certain arms manufacturers are gladly profiting from the current war.

In his attempt to not be “simplistic,” Francis actually makes just the opposite point.

But this is not why blood is being spilled in Ukraine. There is exactly one declining empire — and would-be emperor — that wanted this war.

The extent of how misguided the pope’s thinking is can be seen in the final remarks to the group of Jesuit priests, where he cited the arms manufacturers interests in having wars: “Some say, for example, that the Spanish Civil War was started to prepare for World War II. I do not know if that was really the case, but it could have been.”

In his attempt to not be “simplistic,” Francis’ strange historical analogy actually makes just the opposite point about the current conflict. World War II was being “prepared” in and by Nazi Germany. So yes, we should think hard about how factors below the surface move events. But sometimes, the truth — even in war — is plain to see.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Green

Forest Networks? Revisiting The Science Of Trees And Funghi "Reaching Out"

A compelling story about how forest fungal networks communicate has garnered much public interest. Is any of it true?

Thomas Brail films the roots of a cut tree with his smartphone.

Arborist and conservationist Thomas Brail at a clearcutting near his hometown of Mazamet in the Tarn, France.

Melanie Jones, Jason Hoeksema, & Justine Karst

Over the past few years, a fascinating narrative about forests and fungi has captured the public imagination. It holds that the roots of neighboring trees can be connected by fungal filaments, forming massive underground networks that can span entire forests — a so-called wood-wide web. Through this web, the story goes, trees share carbon, water, and other nutrients, and even send chemical warnings of dangers such as insect attacks. The narrative — recounted in books, podcasts, TV series, documentaries, and news articles — has prompted some experts to rethink not only forest management but the relationships between self-interest and altruism in human society.

But is any of it true?

The three of us have studied forest fungi for our whole careers, and even we were surprised by some of the more extraordinary claims surfacing in the media about the wood-wide web. Thinking we had missed something, we thoroughly reviewed 26 field studies, including several of our own, that looked at the role fungal networks play in resource transfer in forests. What we found shows how easily confirmation bias, unchecked claims, and credulous news reporting can, over time, distort research findings beyond recognition. It should serve as a cautionary tale for scientists and journalists alike.

First, let’s be clear: Fungi do grow inside and on tree roots, forming a symbiosis called a mycorrhiza, or fungus-root. Mycorrhizae are essential for the normal growth of trees. Among other things, the fungi can take up from the soil, and transfer to the tree, nutrients that roots could not otherwise access. In return, fungi receive from the roots sugars they need to grow.

As fungal filaments spread out through forest soil, they will often, at least temporarily, physically connect the roots of two neighboring trees. The resulting system of interconnected tree roots is called a common mycorrhizal network, or CMN.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest