When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Ideas

Butterfly Wings & Wheat: How The Ukraine War Could Spark Global Food Crises

In an interconnected world, we are faced again with the negative implications of the so-called "butterfly effect" when a localized conflict can have far-reaching consequences and trigger lasting crises. For our world's broken food systems, the war in Ukraine should be a wake-up call.

Volunteers provide food at the railway station to internally displaced persons who fled the hostilities waged by Russian invaders in Mukachevo, Ukraine

Volunteers provide food at the Mukachevo, Ukraine railway station

Carlo Petrini*

-OpEd-

Could the conflict that erupted in Ukraine cause a new bread revolution in Egypt? Alas yes, the conditions are in place for this — and other similar upheavals — to happen.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

The outbreak of war in Ukraine — which is upsetting, unexpected and utterly unjustifiable — again leaves us feeling powerless and overwhelmed by circumstances far beyond our control. In a deeply interconnected world, this also forces us to again reckon with the negative implications of the so-called "butterfly effect:" how a dramatic event limited to a specific geographical area can have unexpected consequences in faraway areas of the planet, laying the foundations for serious and lasting crises.

Here, I want to focus specifically on the agri-food sector, in light of a sad fact: conflict and hunger are intimately connected phenomena, when one occurs the other follows almost naturally.


This is confirmed by what the World Food Program reports from Ukraine, where more than three million people are currently receiving food aid. And it is also demonstrated by the concerned statements made by numerous countries across Africa, the Middle East and Europe itself which, albeit for different reasons, fear the direct and indirect repercussions that the conflict will have on the prices and supply of food.

Impact in Africa, Middle East and Europe

Yemen, for example, imports 90% of its food — including 50% of wheat that comes from Russia and Ukraine. For a country where more than half the population (15 million individuals) already live in conditions of food insecurity, this war represents the worsening of an already tragic situation.

Egypt, once a major producer of wheat thanks to the fertility of the Nile, now — due to urbanization and desertification — buys 80% of this product from Ukraine. And in a country where bread has always been a politically controversial commodity (as well as subsidized), it is feared that the rise in prices of the raw material will create economic instability and uprisings by the population.

Due to the climate emergency, Morocco is experiencing its worst drought in 30 years. In the medium term, therefore, it will be forced to import grains, facing higher costs than desired due to the conflict.

We need to move towards sustainable food systems.

The Kenyan government, on the other hand, is worried about the price of fertilizers (of which Russia is one of the main suppliers worldwide), which risks skyrocketing. For small farmers, higher prices mean using fewer fertilizers; therefore a lower harvest, and therefore a lower income. This is further confirmation that we need to move towards sustainable food systems that put power back in the hands of farmers and produce using local and renewable inputs.

Turning now to Europe, we need to acknowledge that our food systems will not be exempt from the conflict. Ukraine is the EU's fourth largest supplier of food, while Russia provides 40% of the gas used to heat the greenhouses where we grow more than half of the vegetables we consume. An increase in gas prices can lead not only to an increase in the price of food, but also to the bankruptcy of some farms, and therefore a decrease in supply.

Bakers in Yemen put bread into plastic bags at a baker Wheat prices have risen sharply on world markets in the wake of the Russian attack on Ukraine, putting more pressure on the already dire situation in Yemen, which imports 90 per cent of its wheat.

Wheat prices have risen sharply. Yemen imports 90% of its wheat, 50% of which comes from Russia and Ukraine.

Hani Al-Ansi/dpa/ZUMA

Food cannot become a weapon

So, arriving after two years of pandemic, this conflict will again make us feel the vulnerability and injustice of a globalized food system that responds only to the law of profit when unforeseen shocks occur.

And while we show fraternal solidarity for the drama that the Ukrainian people are going through — as well as the Russian people who oppose the wicked actions of their ruler — I ask national and international institutions to seriously reflect on the moral duty to change the current food system.

Because at no time must food become a weapon that amplifies the damage of a conflict. Food can and must, only and always, be an instrument to spread peace.

*Carlo Petrini founded the International Slow Food Movement in Italy in 1986 after leading protests against the opening of a McDonald's near the Spanish Steps in Rome. The movement advocates taking a slower, more natural approach to eating, cooking and agriculture, and has spawned other "Slow" movements, including Slow Cities, Slow Travel and Slow Design.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

U.S. Tech Giants Facing Old Chinese Dilemma In Hong Kong: Live With Censorship Or Leave

American tech companies are still active in Hong Kong, unlike the rest of the Chinese market. But Beijing’s growing attacks on the freedom of expression and information have put them in a quandary.

Pedestrians walking past flags of China and Hong Kong on Nathan Road, in Hong Kong

Walking on Nathan Road, Hong Kong.

Christina zur Nedden

HONG KONG — As the teams lined up before a rugby match between Hong Kong and South Korea in November, a well-known song associated with Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement rang out around the stadium instead of the Chinese national anthem. Apparently, a young employee at the local organizing body had accidentally clicked on the song "Glory to Hong Kong" when he searched for the Chinese national anthem, "March of the Volunteers."

Hong Kong was a British colony for more than 150 years. In 1997 the United Kingdom handed control back to China, which in turn guaranteed that the special administrative region would have political autonomy for 50 years. But this freedom has been steadily undermined since 2019, and Beijing is increasingly trying to bring Hong Kong under its control through crackdowns and a puppet government.

In 2019, up to 2 million people took to the streets to protest a proposed extradition bill and Beijing’s growing influence in Hong Kong. "Glory to Hong Kong" was often played at these protests.

The organizers of the November rugby match made an official apology to Beijing and Hong Kong, but the Communist Party called for an investigation into the incident. Although China’s influence in Hong Kong is growing, the formerly democratic island enjoys more freedoms than the Chinese mainland. A proposal to ban "Glory to Hong Kong" in the country was initially rejected by Hong Kong’s High Court. But the Communist Party will not let this "disobedience" go unpunished.

That’s not all. According to the Communist Party, the National Security Law passed in 2020, which in principle forbids all criticism of the People’s Republic, does not only apply to Hong Kong but to the entire world. That means even an American company such as Google could be charged under this law for having the wrong song as the top result on its search engine.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest