eyes on the U.S.

How The War Against Terrorism Has Become An Assault On Citizens

We are well past the tipping point, where governments are violating privacy and limiting the people's rights in the name of some faceless enemy.

luggage has become a national security issue
luggage has become a national security issue
José Fernando Isaza

-Op-ed-

BOGOTA- Many security measures at airports have become counterproductive, managing to improve security only marginally while significantly harming those the measures are ostensibly meant to protect. And government surveillance of citizens has spiraled out of control.

In the war on terrorism, in other words, we have reached a point of diminishing returns.

Consider airport scanners, for example. General knowledge says that the radiation received from them is about equal to the cosmic radiation to which travelers are exposed during one commercial flight. It is not clear whether it is similar to the ultraviolet radiation received without protection at that altitude. The scanners use ionizing X-ray radiation, and the duration of a security check is generally longer than that of a radiography. These devices are not as aggressive as a CT scan, but they are stronger than an X-ray. In the end, these measures put our health at risk and violate privacy in the name of protection.

If the authorities' response to the terrorist attacks on trains and subways in Europe were similar to the paranoid U.S. response, these modes of transportation would have collapsed by now and taken the economy with it, even before the economic crisis hit.

At least in Colombian airports, some of the security protocols seem designed to be contradictory. Security personnel will remove your nail clippers from hand baggage, then the flight crew will serve meals with metal cutlery. And in our day-to-day lives, we have become accustomed to feeling as if we're entering a high-security prison when going to virtually any public or private building, or worse, a university.

And what is the psychological and economic cost for citizens who know that their private or business conversations are being "monitored"? How can we be assured that these private exchanges won't be used as privileged information or be turned against us?

In a column last July, I mentioned the U.S. project to create a center that stores all the information generated from any part of the world. It seems as though, at least according to Edward Snowden, this project is advancing.

From Colombia to Russia

How can we guarantee that in Colombia, for example, the National Police Intelligence operates under different standards? On the one hand, the government requested telecommunications companies to "facilitate" interceptions through a decree issued 10 months ago. On the other, we are only learning about this now.

Another example can be found in the movie The Fourth State, a film based on actual events and directed by Dennis Gansel. It describes how some of the terrorist acts in Russia attributed to the Chechens were in fact executed by dark forces within the secret service. These were later used to justify "anti-terrorist" legislation.

The fear of terrorism inspires an excuse for governments to limit citizen rights and to approve legislation that violates privacy and the presumption of innocence. In the war against terrorism, it seems the citizens are losing and authoritarianism is winning.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Taliban Redux, Cleaned-Up Image Can't Mask Their Cruel Reality

Twenty years later the Islamist group is back in power in Afghanistan, but trying this time to win international support. Now that several months have passed, experts on the ground can offer a clear assessment if the group has genuinely transformed on such issues as women's rights and free speech.

The Taliban have now been in power for almost five months

Atal Ahmadzai and Faten Ghosn

The international community is closely monitoring the Taliban, after the group re-seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021.

There is legitimate reason for concern. The Taliban are again ruling through fear and draconian rules.

The Taliban’s last regime, in the mid-1990s, was marked by human rights violations, including massacres, mass detentions and rape. The regime collapsed on Nov. 14, 2001, shortly after the U.S. launched its global war on terrorism.

Even after the Taliban officially fell from power, their subsequent two decades of insurgency produced various gross human rights violations, an encompassing term under international human rights law.

Keep reading... Show less
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ