When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Ideas

“Foreign Agent,” Putin’s Favorite Euphemism For Targeting Opponents

Russia is increasingly labeling journalists and human rights organizations as “foreign agents.” It’s the Kremlin’s latest – and most effective – way of cracking down on any kind of opposition.

Dmitry Muratov Awarded 2021 Nobel Peace Prize

Dmitry Muratov Awarded 2021 Nobel Peace Prize

Anna Akage

The first thing to understand about those the Russian state calls “foreign agents” is that almost all of them are actually Russian. On top of that, most of these “agents” are either journalists or activists — or the media and human rights organizations they work for.

Foreign agent (иностранный агент - inostrannyi agent) is very much a loaded term and product of Vladimir Putin’s reign. It is a criminal designation bestowed on those whose activities are considered hostile to the state and have in some way received financing from abroad.


According to Russian law, anyone can be recognized as a foreign agent. It can be a media organization, a public organization, or a person. They can engage in absolutely any activity: politics, journalism, or protecting the rights of Russian citizens. Anyone who receives even a dollar in their account from a non-Russian can become a foreign agent. Sending such payments even anonymously back does not guarantee impunity.

A crackdown on press freedom

But the impact extends beyond the purely juridical. In public discourse, foreign agents are equated with spies and enemies of the Motherland. The opposition and independent media are demanding that this phrase be removed from the law and that the penalties be abolished.

On December 15, the St. Petersburg parliament refused to consider an initiative by the opposition party Yabloko to remove the concept of a foreign agent from its legislation. As of the end of 2021, the Russian Ministry of Justice lists 33 media outlets, 62 journalists, and 79 human rights organizations as foreign agents.

The phrase is symptomatic of Russia’s transition towards autocracy.

Among the most prominent foreign agents is Novaya Gazeta, whose editor, Dmitri Muratov. recently won the Nobel Peace Prize. Muratov said he would wear the title of a foreign agent with pride. However, the prize has scared off the Russian Ministry of Justice and the inclusion of Novaya in the blacklist is awaiting Putin’s decision. Now Novaya is the last free newspaper in Russia.

The law on foreign agents was adopted in 2012 as a preparation for a future electoral challenge. But the phrase has firmly entered everyday speech and is symptomatic of Russia’s transition towards autocracy. In September, Putin’s United Russia party won a parliamentary majority. However, those elections were marred by reports of fraud and Putin’s biggest critics were barred from running.

Russian Supreme Court hears case against Memorial Society

Russian Supreme Court hears case against Memorial Society

Stanislav Krasilnikov / TASS / ZUMA Press

A Russian misinterpretation of a U.S. law

The fear of foreign interference in Russia's affairs comes from Russia’s historical ideology of confronting world evil. Yet it is customary in Russia to justify certain actions by mentioning precedents set around the world.

When presenting the federal law on foreign agents, the government was referring to the American Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) law, enacted in 1938, in response to the growing number of organizations sympathetic to Hitler. At that time, Congress could not simply ban Nazi propaganda because the First Amendment guaranteed freedom of speech. Therefore, it decided that organizations or individuals performing any tasks of a foreign state must officially report and register with the state authorities, with no restrictions placed on lobbying activities.

This is not a legal issue, but a political one.

The FARA law applies only to media outlets in which U.S. citizens own less than 80% of the capital and whose editorial policies are controlled by foreign governments. The point of including the media in the list of foreign agents in the U.S. is purely bureaucratic and does not interfere with their work.

The Russian government copied the name of the FARA law but not its essence. An anonymous source in the Russian newspaper Kommersant notes the letter of the law is not so important in such projects. "This is not a legal issue, but a political one. There can be any number of mistakes, and bills pass if the subject of lawmaking is ‘correct.’ If such laws are introduced, it means that someone needs it," they said.

Synonymous with traitor

Russian TV channel Dojd, recognized as a foreign agent in Russia, is fully controlled by Russian shareholders and is not run by any foreign government. So is the human rights organization Memorial, which researches repression in the USSR.

Moreover, while in English the word “agent” is open-ended, in Russian, it is more synonymous with traitor or spy.

If a media outlet or organization is recognized as a foreign agent, any publication must be accompanied by a disclaimer stating that the material is distributed by a foreign agent. This is a huge warning attached to the material, even on social networks, to scare away advertisers if it is about the media and voters if it is about elections. Eventually, the stigma of being labeled as such often leads to bankruptcy, as financing a foreign agent entails criminal penalties and thus dissuades people or organizations from providing funding.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Russia's Military Failures Are Really About Its Soldiers

No doubt, strategic errors and corruption at the highest ranks in the Kremlin are partly to blame for the Russian military's stunning difficulties in Ukraine. But the roots run deeper, where the ordinary recruits come from, how they are exploited, how they react.

Army reserve soldiers go to Red Square to attend a Pioneer Induction ceremony

Anna Akage

To the great relief of Ukraine and the great surprise of the rest of the world, the Russian army — considered until February 24, the second strongest in the world — is now eminently beatable on the battlefield against Ukrainian forces operating with vastly inferior firepower.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

After renouncing the original ambitions to take Kyiv and unseat the Ukrainian government, the focus turned to the southeastern region of Donbas, where a would-be great battle on a scale comparable to World War II Soviet victories has turned into a quagmire peppered with laughable updates by Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov on TikTok.

The Russians have not managed to occupy a single significant Ukrainian city, except Kherson, which they partially destroyed and now find difficult to hold. Meanwhile, Ukrainian civilians are left to suffer the bombing of cities and villages from Lviv to Odessa, with looting, torture and assorted war crimes.

The reasons for both the poor performance and atrocities are many, and include deep-seated corruption and lack of professionalism up through the highest ranks, including Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, who had never served in the army, and arrived in his position only because of his loyalty to the No. 1 man in the Kremlin.

Keep reading... Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch Video Show less
MOST READ