When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Ideas

Novak Djokovic Could Wind Up As A Puppet Of Serbia's Nationalists

The Serbian tennis star is neither a victim nor a heavy, writes Serbian journalist Tatjana Đorđević Simić. But back home in Serbia, he is a hero who risks to turn in to a puppet of Serbia's nationalistic government.

Novak Djokovic Could Wind Up As A Puppet Of Serbia's Nationalists

Djokovic was expelled from Australia and faces a three-year visa ban

Tatjana Đorđević Simić

In a video circulating from Serbia's public broadcaster RTS, a young Novak Djokovic is asked by an interviewer what his dream in life is. He doesn't hesitate: to become No. 1 tennis player in the world. Djokovic was only seven years old at the time.

"As a boy I often dreamed of playing at Wimbledon," Djokovic once said. He has played it, and won it six times. In his career so far, he has won all the other major tournaments, 20 Grand Slams in total.


And if he had won the 2022 Australian Open tournament that starts today, he would have been the player with the most Grand Slams in the history of tennis. Unfortunately, this dream of his will not come true as Djokovic yesterday was expelled from Australia after the final ruling of the federal court that unanimously rejected the Serbian champion's appeal against his visa cancellation.

Nationalistic tones

The Djokovic saga that has dragged on in the world of sports and beyond — because he apparently entered Australia unvaccinated against COVID-19 — seems to be over. Over the past ten days, the worldwide media hunt for the Serbian champion has turned him from a good and strong man into an anti-vaxxer who couldn't care less. The affair had such an immediate international echo that it was bound to descend quickly into nationalistic tones in Serbia, turning him into yet another victim of a people on which all the blame fell for the Balkan Wars.

The father of the Serbian champion referred to his son's lost battle against the Australian government on social media in similar tones: "The attempt to assassinate the best sportsman in the world is over, 50 bullets in Novak's chest."

He is neither a victim of a witch hunt, nor a witch

In addition to the rhetoric employed by Djoković's father, which echoes many clichés that have strengthened Serbian nationalist propaganda since the 1990s, immediate support for the battle lost by the tennis player came from Serbian President Aleksandar Vučic.

"This looks like a witch hunt," Vučic said, adding that Novak can now return to Serbia, where he is always welcome and where he can look everyone in the eye with his head held high.

A mural in Belgrade

Dragoslavchica

No witch hunt, or witch

From the words of the father, who justifiably only wanted to defend his son, and from the words of the Serbian president, who seems to have only wanted to defend one of his citizens who happens to be the world's best tennis player, it seems that the whole West, including Australia, hates Serbia.

Defending Djokovic doesn't mean defending the country. He is neither a victim of a witch hunt, nor a witch. At this moment, unfortunately, he is rather a puppet in the hands of the government in Belgrade, which is exploiting the popularity of the champion.

Surely Djokovic would not have gone to Australia if he had not been issued a valid visa, and if there had been no guarantees from the organizers of the Australian Open. Conversely, he could have guessed what he would have been up against, as Australia requires visitors to be vaccinated in order to enter the country.

Whether it is his own fault, or it depends on some human error made by his staff while filling out the forms to get the visa, as Djokovic himself recently stated, he will not play one of the biggest tournaments. He also risks a three-year ban from entering Australia. But despite what he seems to have lost this time, while he is on his way back to Serbia, his people are waiting impatiently for him because he remains their No. 1. Forever.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

What's Spoiling The Kids: The Big Tech v. Bad Parenting Debate

Without an extended family network, modern parents have sought to raise happy kids in a "hostile" world. It's a tall order, when youngsters absorb the fears (and devices) around them like a sponge.

Image of a kid wearing a blue striped sweater, using an ipad.

Children exposed to technology at a very young age are prominent today.

Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ — A 2021 report from the United States (the Youth Risk Behavior Survey) found that 42% of the country's high-school students persistently felt sad and 22% had thought about suicide. In other words, almost half of the country's young people are living in despair and a fifth of them have thought about killing themselves.

Such chilling figures are unprecedented in history. Many have suggested that this might be the result of the COVID-19 pandemic, but sadly, we can see depression has deeper causes, and the pandemic merely illustrated its complexity.

I have written before on possible links between severe depression and the time young people spend on social media. But this is just one aspect of the problem. Today, young people suffer frequent and intense emotional crises, and not just for all the hours spent staring at a screen. Another, possibly more important cause may lie in changes to the family composition and authority patterns at home.

Firstly: Families today have fewer members, who communicate less among themselves.

Young people marry at a later age, have fewer children and many opt for personal projects and pets instead of having children. Families are more diverse and flexible. In many countries, the number of children per woman is close to or less than one (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong among others).

In Colombia, women have on average 1.9 children, compared to 7.6 in 1970. Worldwide, women aged 15 to 49 years have on average 2.4 children, or half the average figure for 1970. The changes are much more pronounced in cities and among middle and upper-income groups.

Of further concern today is the decline in communication time at home, notably between parents and children. This is difficult to quantify, but reasons may include fewer household members, pervasive use of screens, mothers going to work, microwave ovens that have eliminated family cooking and meals and, thanks to new technologies, an increase in time spent on work, even at home. Our society is addicted to work and devotes little time to minors.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest