When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Germany

Bayer Can Drop The Name Monsanto, But Can’t Erase The Hate

The German pharma giant wants to do a bit of 'rebranding,' after the mega merger with the U.S.-based agro-giant. But anti-Monsanto sentiment is bound to remain no matter what it's called.

Sowing the seeds of hate
Sowing the seeds of hate
Elisabeth Dostert

MUNICH — Bayer is dropping the name Monsanto. What's surprising about this is not the move itself, but the speed with which the new owners are getting rid of the old name. Apparently, for the German multinational, things just couldn't go fast enough. After all, for its critics, the U.S. agro-multinational is the epitome of evil. Over the years, it had acquired names such as "Evil Incorporated," "Monsatan" or, in reference to its work in genetic engineering, "Mutanto." Perhaps no other company on Earth has attracted as much hatred as Monsanto.

So the name will disappear. And then all shall be well, right? It's not that simple. Any coming attack will now be directed with full force against Monsanto's new owner, the German multinational Bayer. And the blows will be coming from many places.

There are, for example, the class action lawsuits filed by cancer patients in the United States who blame their disease on the active ingredients glyphosate and dicamba. Such legal disputes can drag on for years and the outcome is completely open. What's more, Bayer will not, under any circumstances, discontinue the genetic engineering business — on the contrary. Crop protection products and genetically modified organisms are one of Monsanto's core competencies. The core business remains, and so will the criticism.

He is confident that Bayer is the better brand.

But the attacks might also come from within. Despite everything, Bayer CEO Werner Baumann is certain of his eventual victory. He is confident that Bayer is the better brand and wants to impose his corporate culture on the Americans. But what if that doesn't work? What if the takeover of Monsanto ultimately fails because of cultural barriers? Many employees identify with "their" company through its name. Baumann is giving Monsanto employees no time to say goodbye to their old name and get used to the new one. The chief of the Leverkusen-based company is acting like a conqueror, and that's a mistake.

He could have taken his time. He could have waited to be able to better assess whether the integration was really successful. But by taking over Monsanto, Bayer is endangering its own reputation. In other words, it may be rid of the name, but it won't be rid of the hatred anytime soon.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Sleep Divorce: The Benefits For Couples In Having Separate Beds

Sleeping separately is often thought to be the beginning of the end for a loving couple. But studies show that having permanently separate beds — if you have the space and means — can actually reinforce the bonds of a relationship.

Image of a woman sleeping in a bed.

A woman sleeping in her bed.

BUENOS AIRES — Couples, it is assumed, sleep together — and sleeping apart is easily taken as a sign of a relationship gone cold. But several recent studies are suggesting, people sleep better alone and "sleep divorce," as the habit is being termed, can benefit both a couple's health and intimacy.

That is, if you have the space for it...

While sleeping in separate beds is seen as unaffectionate and the end of sex, psychologist María Gabriela Simone told Clarín this "is not a fashion, but to do with being able to feel free, and to respect yourself and your partner."

She says the marriage bed originated "in the matrimonial duty of sharing a bed with the aim of having sex to procreate." That, she adds, gradually settled the idea that people "who love each other sleep together."

Is it an imposition then, or an overwhelming preference? Simone says intimacy is one thing, sleeping another.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest