When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
InterNations
LGBTQ Plus

A Trans Soldier Fighting Abroad For Freedom Is Denied Her Own Back Home

A German soldier was reprimanded because of an online dating profile. She was punished for her sexual freedom — the same freedoms that the armed forces claim to be fighting for abroad.

Anastasia Biefang stands in a room of the Federal Administrative Court.​

Anastasia Biefang stands in a room of the Federal Administrative Court.

Frédéric Schwilden

-OpEd-

BERLIN — Anastasia Biefang completed two foreign missions in Afghanistan. For two years, she was the first trans woman commander of a battalion of the Bundeswehr, Germany's national armed forces. Her rank: lieutenant colonel. She defended and fought for Western values such as democracy, tolerance, respect for human rights and freedom of the individual.

And this freedom, for which she endangered her own life, is now being denied to her – by her employer, the Bundeswehhr, after all, and the Federal Administrative Court of Germany. “Commanders must consider the impact on their professional reputation when making private internet appearances,” reads a recent press release from the Federal Administrative Court.

✉️ You can receive our LGBTQ+ International roundup every week directly in your inbox. Subscribe here.


Biefang had created a profile on an online dating platform. She was recognizable on it, however the profile did not have a complete name and had no references to her activity in the Bundeswehr. The text of her profile read: “Spontaneous, lustful, trans*, open relationship looking for sex. All genders welcome.” Her disciplinary superior reprimanded her for this.


Different than the Taliban

The Federal Administrative Court has now ruled that the disciplinary measure was lawful. In its reasoning, it said that “a female soldier in the particularly prominent official position of a battalion commander with personnel responsibility for approximately 1,000 people would have to show consideration for her professional position” when choosing the words and images used on the internet.

“She must therefore avoid wording that creates the false impression of an indiscriminate sex life and a significant lack of integrity of character. The words ‘open relationship looking for sex. All gender welcome’ also raise doubts about the required integrity of character from the perspective of a reasonable observer, which is why a reprimand was allowed to be invoked against this formulation as the mildest disciplinary measure."


For our constitutional state, an indiscriminate sex life should be a freedom of the individual

Enemies of freedom, whether from the Taliban, the radical right or the left, like to blather about the decadence of the West. Depending on the political current, the issues they bring up are luxuries, the use of intoxicants, the stance on migration, or individual intimate decisions, such as with whom and how one has sex or to which gender one feels one belongs.


In Afghanistan, homosexuals, transmen and other “sodomists,” as it is called there, are stoned and burned to death, often publicly in front of crowds in a folk festival atmosphere. These atrocities are some of the reasons why the Bundeswehr was also in Afghanistan.

Anastasia Biefang was not stoned to death. But she was disciplined by her employer. It is a scandal that a German court has come to the conclusion that the “impression of an indiscriminate sex life” evokes a “considerable lack of integrity of character.”

Because that is exactly what should distinguish our rule of law from the Taliban. For our constitutional state, an indiscriminate sex life should be a freedom of the individual that deserves protection – just like driving a Ferrari, smoking, or setting up a climate camp with juggling workshops.

Anastasia Biefang during a handover of command ceremony in Storkow

Anastasia Biefang during a handover of command ceremony in Storkow, Germany

anastasiabiefang

Double standards

The Bundeswehr writes on its website about “freedom, equality, democracy, human dignity and the rule of law.” On its homepage, the Bundeswehr presents itself as the defender of the free democratic basic order. The Bundeswehr literally writes: “Whoever [...] actively works towards an elimination of the free democratic basic order must expert observation by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and investigations by the police and judiciary.”

But anyone who denies a female soldier a mature and, above all, non-criminal sex life, and sanctions her for it, is doing just that. Anyone who acts in this way is actively working towards the elimination of the free democratic basic order. But the soldier Anastasia Biefang cannot rely on the constitutional protection, the police and the judiciary. She is allowed to defend our freedom in Afghanistan, but she is not allowed to live out her own freedom, whether in the darkroom or at home.

It is not the trans soldier who is perverted, but the state for which she was willing to die.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

Iran's War On Abortion Rights, A Toxic Mix Of Theocracy And Demographic Panic

Ending a pregnancy has become a major complication, and a crime, for Iranian women who cannot or will not have children in a country wracked by socio-economic woes and a leadership.

photo of a young child surrounded by women in chadors

Iran's government wants to boost the birth rate at all costs

Office of Supreme Leader/ZUMA
Firoozeh Nordstrom

Keen to boost the population, Iran's Islamic regime has reversed its half-hearted family planning policies of earlier years and is curbing birth control with measures that include banning abortion.

Its (2021) Law to Support the Family and Rejuvenate the Population (Qanun-e hemayat az khanevadeh va javani-e jam'iyat) threatens to fine the women who want to abort, and fine, imprison, and dismiss the performing physician, if the pregnancy is not deemed to be life-threatening. The law also bans contraceptives.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

The measures are in line with the dictates of Iran's Supreme leader, Ali Khamenei. He was already denouncing birth control policies by 2018-19, though conservative elements among Iran's rulers have always dismissed birth control as a piece of Western corruption.

Today, measures to boost families include land and credit incentives for young couples, but it is difficult to say how far they will counter a marked reluctance among Iranians to marry and procreate. Kayhan-London had an online conversation with individuals affected by the new rules in Iran.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest