When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Geopolitics

What A Nuclear Deal Could Mean For Iran's Broken Economy

Ordinary Iranians are hoping for a speck of economic relief and nothing more, if Tehran can sign a nuclear deal with world powers that could alleviate longstanding sanctions.

Photo of traffic on a road in Tehran

Red light on Tehran's Mousavi Street

Roshanak Astaraki

-Analysis-

As the fate of talks on Iran's nuclear activities remains uncertain, millions of Iranians are hoping, cautiously, that a deal with the West could help alleviate a range of socio-economic problems. Some economic agents hope a deal to renew the 2015 nuclear pact will boost business, travel and spending. Others insist a no-deal is still better than prolonged uncertainty. The question remains, even with a deal that will soften the sanctions on Iran, can Iranians expect even a measure of prosperity in an economy that is restricted, dysfunctional and beset with opaque procedures and massive cronyism?

For over 20 years, the Iranian regime's cat-and-mouse game with the world over its disconcerting nuclear program, suspected money-laundering and support for regional militias and hitmen, have earned it a range of sanctions on Iran's economy and financial system. The regime has furthermore refused to sign the FATF or international pact to block terrorist and criminal finances.


While business sectors have recently become hopeful that a deal is in sight, which could ease many transactions, this is unlikely to have a significant impact on ordinary Iranians' livelihoods, even in the long term.

In recent years, Iran could not legally sell crude oil, its chief export, which it has partly stored inside the country or in hired tankers in countries like China or Malaysia. If sanctions were lifted, it would in principle be ready to place around 100 million barrels of crude oil and liquefied gas onto world markets. The proceeds would certainly relieve a cash-strapped government, but will there be buyers, and can Iran swiftly find itself a niche in the markets?

Backward oil industry, and dynamic markets

While Iranian officials blame sanctions for the massive reduction in oil and gas revenues, Iran's energy sector rather shows a failure over decades to invest in updating production and refinement capacities. The country cannot even meet its own gas needs, so sanctions aside, a dilapidated and indebted energy sector can barely expect to nab market shares from dynamic rivals like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iraq.

Regime officials intermittently give contrasting, even dubious, figures on the state of the energy sector. Early this year, President Ibrahim Raisi claimed that in the second half of 2021, the country signed oil deals worth U.S. $14 billion. Days later, the Oil Minister Javad Owji bumped the figure up to "more than $16 billion," and a month later, the National Iranian Oil Company pulled it down to a little over $9 billion.

These years, while Tehran was busy meddling in regional politics, countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia pumped a part of their massive revenues into their oil and gas industries, for which they are reaping the compounded benefits. Saudi Arabia earned more than U.S. $115 billion from oil in the first six months of 2022. Even Iraq, a country beset with war and civil and political turmoil since 2000, earned some $61 billion exporting crude oil in the first six months of this year.

Iran's economic growth in the past decade has hovered around zero, after posting negative rates in the decade after 2000. In the 1990s, without nuclear sanctions, typical growth rates were around 5% a year. Even after the 2015 pact that reduced its economic isolation, it failed to boost productive activities — though not spending or inflation. The latest inflation figure given by the state statistics agency was 55% a year, though independent observers suspect the rate is higher.

Photo of Iran's Minister for Foreign Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif holding a draft of the nuclear agreement in Vienna Javad Zarif

Iran's former Minister for Foreign Affairs Mohammad Javad Zarif holding a draft of the nuclear agreement in Vienna back in 2015

Mehdi Ghassemi/DPA/ZUMA

Anything for ordinary Iranians?

Iranians were delighted with the alleviation of sanctions after the first nuclear pact in 2015, but with the dismal political and economic experiences of recent years, do not expect a revived deal to entail significant liberalization or palpable benefits. Iran's regime has wasted billions of dollars on expansionism, repeatedly suppressed peaceful protests and deepened an already marked rift between state and people. Talk of another pact brings little joy to ordinary folk.

After the first pact, very little of the monies the regime earned or recovered were spent on projects serving the public interest. A lot of it seems to have vanished, as far as Iranians can discern. The last government, headed by President Hasan Rohani, claimed it "revived" the economy somewhat in the years of the nuclear pact, but beyond a revival of oil exports, there was little movement in the real economy, beyond hydrocarbons. Which is why, as soon as U.S. President Donald Trump ditched the multilateral pact in 2018, the economy slid back into its "natural" state of stagflation! It is unlikely the Raisi government will spend any windfall earnings more productively than its predecessors.

Would a nuclear deal bring Iranians back?

His government owes the Central Bank billions of dollars, some of which was inherited from the Rohani presidency. In this an eminently opaque system, nobody knows exactly how much is owed, though some estimates put it in excess of Saudi Arabia's first-semester oil earnings. In spite of its falling revenues, the government recently raised pensions.

Perhaps part of the problem with a cash injection in the economy is the ineffective supervision of its expenditure. The budget for the year 2022-23 foresees 40% of earnings from the sale of 1.4 million barrels of crude oil to be paid to the National Development Fund, an organ under the orders of the Supreme Leader. His decisions are not subject to parliament scrutiny.

And the country has its ideological expenses, like paying foreign militias and allies. According to a former lawmaker, Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, so far Iran has paid U.S. $20-30 billion to the ruler of Syria, Bashar al-Assad. An estimate from the United Nations put its annual expenditures in Syria in the civil-war years after 2011 at six billion dollars.

Self-sanctions

The Iranian economy's structural obstacles are effectively another set of sanctions, as obstructive as the foreign sort. Many economists claim these "self-sanctions" may have harmed economic activity even more. These problems include cronyism and murky monopolies that restrict supplies and raise costs for ordinary businesses. Removing sanctions will not lead to competitive business practices, or cut bureaucracy inside Iran.

Could it reverse the flow of capital leaving the country? Iranians may have taken out up to U.S. $10 billions' worth of hard currency in the Persian year to late March 2022, in spite of restrictions on all money flows. Millions of trained and educated Iranians have left the country in the past decade. Would a nuclear deal bring them back?

Beside the pact, Iran would have to sign the FATF, or it cannot hope to return to international financial circuits. There is a mountain of economic woes in Iran, unrelated to Western sanctions. A pact, if signed, is likely to relieve the pressure on the regime, but is it enough to revive a dormant economy that must sustain millions of workers and households? Right now, the only ones rubbing their hands at the prospect of the "economic opening" being touted in Tehran are the wheelers and the dealers and Revolutionary guards with a finger in every pie and on the pulse of every lucrative activity in a dilapidated Iran.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Hysterical To Hypersexual: Bogus Female Diseases Have Always Held Women Down

Throughout history, women have been overdiagnosed with mainly psychiatric ailments and syndromes that have already been ruled out, from hysteria to nymphomania. This distorted portrait, which had its golden age in the 19th century, has been questioned in recent decades by the research community.

Female patient with "sleep hysteria" wearing a straight jacket in La Salpêtrière hospital in Paris.

Beatriz de Vera

"Born weak and sensitive, the woman, faithful companion of man, deserves the most lively interest and presents a vast field for the meditations of philosophers and doctors." This is how the Treatise on the Diseases of Women begins, a text from 1844 that aims to be an update of everything known by medicine about women to date.

The "fair sex" or the "angel in the house" were names used by some scientists of the 19th century, who underpinned the notion of the "weaker sex" in the collective imagination to refer to women.

“The physical modifications that constitute the beauties of women are in inverse proportion to those that constitute those of men. The features of her face have fine and pleasant proportions, her feet are smaller and her hands are delicate, her arms, thighs and legs are thicker, the muscles of all her limbs are sweetly demarcated with undulating lines”, writes the doctor Baltasar de Viguera in Female physiology and pathology (1827).

For De Viguera, who recounted the sensitivity and delicacy in forms, senses and character of women, their qualities had to do with "the organs of the womb."

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ