When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
In The News

After Dutch Apology For Slavery, Why Is Belgium Balking On Its Colonial History?

On the same day that Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte officially apologized for the Netherlands’ involvement in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, in neighboring Belgium, a parliamentary committee was unable to garner enough political support to apologize for decades of brutal colonization in central Africa.

photo of a statue of King Leopold II in Antwerp, Belgium, vandalized during anti-colonial protests in 2020.

A statue of King Leopold II in Antwerp, Belgium, vandalized during anti-colonial protests in 2020.

Anne-Sophie Goninet and Riley Sparks

Belgium and the Netherlands share a border, a language and a bustling trade relationship in the heart of Europe — they also share an ugly colonial legacy.

Yet while the Netherlands offered a landmark official apology this week for its ugly past, politicians in Belgium couldn't agree to do the same with its own colonial atrocities.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte officially apologized on Monday for the Netherlands’ involvement in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, saying the country needed to do more to atone for its past. The country will set up a €200 million fund dedicated to raising awareness of the country’s past, as well as “addressing the present-day effects of slavery,” the Dutch government announced.

But on the same day in neighboring Belgium, a parliamentary committee folded after more than two years of work when members of parliament couldn’t agree on whether the country should apologize for decades of brutal colonization in central Africa.

The Belgian government established the committee shortly after the 2020 U.S. murder of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis set off a global reckoning over racism and colonialism — an event that also partly inspired the Dutch apology.

Fear of reparations

Committee members had reached consensus on nearly all of 128 recommendations to be sent to the Belgian parliament, but couldn’t agree on whether the country should make an apology, reported RTBF.

“Why should all Belgians of today apologize?” member of Parliament Maggie De Block asked in November. Some members worried that an official apology could lead to a request for reparations.

Yet for Green party representative Guillaume Defosse, the committee’s failure to reach an agreement on apologizing was a “waste, a huge disappointment.”

Legacy of King Leopold II

The Belgian government has never apologized for atrocities committed during its colonization of what is now Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Burundi.

Over four decades, the country’s quest for rubber under King Leopold II led to the deaths of as many as 10 million Congolese — cutting the country's population in half by 1920.

“To think that the Congolese, Burundian and Rwandan people deserve nothing but our deep regrets … is to consider that they do not deserve apologies,” Belgian lawyer and professor Pierre d’Argent wrote in Brussels-based daily Le Soir this week. “It’s putting our dignity ahead of theirs.”

An apology for the country’s colonial past is long overdue and would be a “dignified and honorable act,” d’Argent wrote.

In a visit to Kinshasa in 2022, Belgian King Philippe offered his “deepest regrets” and also brought back a Congolese mask, the first of 84,000 objects plundered from Congo which the Belgian government agreed to return.

Still, Philippe did not officially apologize for the kingdom’s decades of bloody rule.

“In the face of the crimes committed by Belgium, regrets are not enough. We expect an apology and a promise of reparations,” Congolese Senator Francine Muyumba Nkanga said on Twitter after the king’s visit.

Dutch Prime Minster Mark Rutte apologizing for the past actions of the Dutch State: to enslaved people in the past


Other countries

European countries have a mixed record on apologizing for slavery and colonial abuses.

Germany apologized last year for killing 75,000 Herero and Nama people in Namibia in a 1904-1908 campaign the German foreign minister described as genocide.

Germany Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said in December that she would return bronze sculptures stolen by British colonizers from what is now Nigeria, on her next visit to the country. The country has already agreed to return more than 500 of the sculptures currently in German museums.

The British royal family has condemned the UK’s slave trading, with Prince William recently saying he felt “profound sorrow” for slavery — but the family and British politicians have never officially apologized.

UK institutions including the Bank of England and insurance broker Lloyds of London, as well as the city of Edinburgh have apologized for their participation in the slave trade.

Across the Atlantic, Canadian leaders have apologized on several occasions for the country’s residential school system, which separated Indigenous children from their families as part of a system of cultural genocide — although the government has been criticized for not moving quickly enough to address the ongoing effects of colonization.

Reaction to Monday's Dutch apology was mixed in the Caribbean, where Prime Minister Silveria Jacobs of the island nation of Sint Maarten wasn’t yet ready to accept an apology.

Local activist and scholar Rhoda Arrindell in the former Dutch Antilles said the Netherlands needs to offer reparations in addition to the apology. “It's a one-sided, colonial approach, and we reject it,” she declared.

As for Belgium, and its former colonies, there's an even longer road yet to travel.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Why The U.S. Lost Its Leverage In The Middle East — And May Never Get It Back

In the Israel-Hamas war, Qatar now plays the key role in negotiations, while the United States appears increasingly disengaged. Shifts in the region and beyond require that Washington move quickly or risk ceding influence to China and others for the long term.

Photograph of U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken  shaking hands with sraeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

November 30, 2023, Tel Aviv, Israel: U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken shakes hands with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

Chuck Kennedy/U.S State/ZUMA
Sébastien Boussois


PARIS — Upon assuming office in 2008, then-President Barack Obama declared that United States would gradually begin withdrawing from various conflict zones across the globe, initiating a complex process that has had a major impact on the international landscape ever since.

This started with the American departure from Iraq in 2010, and was followed by Donald Trump's presidency, during which the "Make America Great Again" policy redirected attention to America's domestic interests.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

The withdrawal trend resumed under Joe Biden, who ordered the exit of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021. To maintain a foothold in all intricate regions to the east, America requires secure and stable partnerships. The recent struggle in addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict demonstrates that Washington increasingly relies on the allied Gulf states for any enduring influence.

Since the collapse of the Camp David Accords in 1999 during Bill Clinton's tenure, Washington has consistently supported Israel without pursuing renewed peace talks that could have led to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

While President Joe Biden's recent challenges in pushing for a Gaza ceasefire met with resistance from an unyielding Benjamin Netanyahu, they also stem from the United States' overall disengagement from the issue over the past two decades. Biden now is seeking to re-engage in the Israel-Palestine matter, yet it is Qatar that is the primary broker for significant negotiations such as the release of hostages in exchange for a ceasefire —a situation the United States lacks the leverage to enforce.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest