When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Traitor, Spy, Pro-Russian: Ukrainians Who Question Kyiv Face Grave Accusations

In Ukraine, those who do not want to fight on the front or who want negotiations cannot say so publicly for fear of accusations of being traitors.

Picture of ruins in Dnipro after Russian invasion

Destroyed buildings in Dnipro, Ukraine

Patricia Simón

“I don't want to fight. They are sending the soldiers to almost certain death because they have far less means than the Russians. Also, I don't think that (President Volodomyr) Zelensky, Europe or the United States have negotiated enough to try to stop this war. But, of course, you can't say that publicly, nor do we have a way to escape.”

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

The young man speaking wants to preserve his anonymity. For uttering statements like this, he can be accused of desertion, collaboration with Russia, or being a traitor or a spy. He could also end up being sentenced to more than ten years in prison. Dimitry, a pseudonym to protect him, no longer even dares to talk about these issues by online chat with his friends.

The day before, one of Dmitry's friends had been taking photos on a Dnipro street with his cell phone. He was followed home by two men from the "Secret Services", as these plainclothes officers are referred to by everyone in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, in the east of the country neighboring the Donbas region. Once there, they checked his computer, hard drives, mobile phone, his content on social media; and they asked him why he took photos and if he worked for the Russians. It is also common that at the checkpoints on most streets and highways of the country, passengers are asked to show the photo folder of their mobile phones if they are considered suspicious.

Control does not seem democratic

"They say that this war is between authoritarianism and democracy, but all this control does not seem very democratic, right?" asks Dimitry, both nervous that someone is watching us and relieved to be able to share his bitterness over a war that, for him, began in 2014.

This war has increased anti-Russian sentiment even among those who speak Russian

“Many of us were not in favor of the war in Donbas. Many people there feel Russian. We ourselves have many relatives in Russia. And we didn't think it was right that they attacked them. And we couldn't say that publicly either because it was considered treason and being pro-Russian. But then the dead and wounded soldiers began to arrive. So a lot of people changed their mentality and started to feel more Ukrainian and nationalistic,” he adds.

Bohdan Chuma, a Hispanic professor at the Catholic University of Lviv, says: “This war has increased anti-Russian sentiment even among those who speak Russian, are of other ethnic groups, or had a stronger local identity like those from Odessa, who now feel more Ukrainian than from Odessa. Putin has been the best creator of a Ukrainian national identity. He has achieved, according to the polls, that 97% of Ukrainians recognize Zelensky as the national president."

Photo of homes affected by Russian bombardment in Dnipro

Homes affected by Russian bombardment in Dnipro

Patricia Simón

Accusations of espionage

“Our relatives in Russia used to send us money to help us. Now, when we tell them that their army has bombed us, they don't understand what is happening, but they can't complain," explains the owner of a shop next to the factory and nursery that were bombed by the Russian Army at the end of February.

A majority of the college-educated working-class youth does not want to go to the front lines.

She also prefers to preserve her anonymity. She is afraid that her words may be misunderstood and the "Secret Services" will accuse her of being a traitor. Or that this journalist is a Russian spy. Or that something happens with her statements that she cannot understand, but that ends up harming her or her family. People in this part of the country are always trying to prevent possible accusations of espionage.

Mentioning the idea of a deserter causes contemptuous faces in most conversations I have. There are even those who deny the possibility that a Ukrainian man may want to evade the honor of defending his people by fighting in the army. But according to Dimitry, among his friends — college-educated working-class youth — a majority do not want to go to the front lines. According to a report by Israel Merino, those who have managed to cross into countries like Poland to avoid it face insults and rejection by other refugees.

“If I could, I would go to another country where there really was a democracy and I could say all these things without fear of ending up in prison for being disloyal. I love my country and everything that Russia is doing to us hurts me a lot. But it is not going to be solved by means of weapons,” he concludes before saying goodbye.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

A Russian Nuclear Bluff Or The Very Dangerous End Of "Mutually Assured Destruction"?

Retired Major-General Alexander Vladimirov wrote the Russian “war bible.” His words have weight. Now he has declared that the use of nuclear weapons in the war in Ukraine is inevitable, citing a justification that consigns the principle of deterrence to the history books.

Photograph of a Russian Yars intercontinental ballistic missile system showcased during the annual Victory Day military parade.

May 9, 2023, Moscow: A Russian Yars intercontinental ballistic missile system during the annual Victory Day military parade.

Gavriil Grigorov/Kremlin Pool/ZUMA
Slavoj Žižek


LJUBLJANANuclear war is the “inevitable” conclusion of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. That's the opinion of retired Major-General Alexander Vladimirov, from an interview he gave last week to the journalist Vladislav Shurygin, and reported by the British tabloid The Daily Mail.

The retired general and author of the General Theory of War, which is seen in Moscow as the nation's "war bible," warned: “For the transition to the use of weapons of mass destruction, only one thing is needed – a political decision by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief [Vladimir Putin].” According to Vladimirov, “the goals of Russia and the goals of the West are their survival and historical eternity.”

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

That means, he concludes, that they will use all methods at their disposal in this conflict, including nuclear weapons. “I am sure that nuclear weapons will be used in this war – inevitably, and from this, neither we nor the enemy have anywhere to go.”

Recently, Christopher Nolan’s film Oppenheimer sparked outrage in India because it contained an intimate scene that made reference to the Bhagavad Gita. Many people took to Twitter to ask how the censor board could have approved this scene. A press release from the Save Culture, Save India Foundation read: “We do not know the motivation and logic behind this unnecessary scene on life of a scientist. A scene in the movie shows a woman making a man read Bhagwad Geeta aloud (during) sexual intercourse.”

My response to this scene is precisely the opposite: the Bhagavad Gita portrays cruel acts of military slaughter as a sacred duty, so instead we should be protesting that a tender act of bodily passion has been sullied by associating it with a spiritual obscenity. We should be outraged at the evil of “spiritualizing” physical desire.

Isn’t Vladimirov doing something similar in this interview? He is seeking to somehow elevate a (self-destructive, murderous) passion by couching it in obtuse terms such as “historical eternity.”

Keep reading...Show less

The latest