When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

"Kremlin Insiders Say..." How Even Independent Media Spread Russian Misinformation

Moscow has a tight grip on Russia's media. But instead of trying to fully control the few remaining independent media outlets, it learned how to manipulate them for its own purposes.

Photo of ​Russian President Vladimir Putin facing journalists during a press conference

File photo of Russian Putin during a press conference


Since its invasion of Ukraine, even as it struggles on the battlefield, Russia has made significant progress on how to win on the information frontline inside the country.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Exiled Russian-language media outlet Proekt reports that Russians and people around the world have lost their last hope at actually understanding the Kremlin's actions.

That's because Russian leaders have learned how to play the few remaining independent Russian media outlets with Kremlin-spun “insights”. These are then used by the foreign media and key decision-makers at home and abroad.

One of these outlets is Meduza, an influential Russian- and English-language news website based in Riga, Latvia.

The Kremlin effectively deprived journalists of the opportunity to learn information directly and openly from officials. So, some media outlets began to pass off political strategists and experts as sources in the government. The war has only worsened the situation: millions of people read unverified rumors and make critical decisions based on them.

"High-ranking federal official"

In February 2017, for example, Sergei Kirienko, Putin's new first deputy head of administration in charge of domestic policy, invited a group of Russian journalists for a closed meeting.

Correspondents from newspapers, magazines, and online media had been coming to such briefings for years. They needed insider information, and meetings with top Kremlin officials were a good excuse to get it. What’s more, journalists accessed the Kremlin to get acquainted with lower-ranking officials. Through such acquaintances, important news with links to Kremlin sources appeared in the Russian and foreign media.

Meduza's articles sometimes stunned other journalists, but the flow continued unabated.

By Kremlin standards, Kiriyenko was very outspoken that day, and his statements interested the audience. Kiriyenko was only allowed to be quoted as "a high-ranking federal official." While only newspaper journalists went to the briefings, few paid attention to the fact that quotes by Kremlin sources periodically appeared at the same time in different media outlets.

Scoops and sources

A few weeks later, the Kremlin reconvened a group of journalists and made it clear that it would now fight leaks from officials and instead would give comments from pro-Kremlin experts. Since then, Kiriyenko has never briefed again, and many of his subordinates have shut themselves off from the press.

True, readers were still interested in insider information from the Kremlin, and the media did their best to accommodate them. Meduza was the most active in this way: by the end of 2018, it had become almost the leading supplier of news based on "Kremlin sources."

At some point, the publication editors decided to provide readers with exclusive information. In 2019, Meduza set up a never-before-seen conveyor belt, first publishing two domestic political exclusives a month, and after Russia attacked Ukraine, eight per month.

Meduza's articles based on Kremlin sources sometimes stunned other journalists and provoked accusations on social media, but the flow of such stories continued unabated. In particular, Meduza, citing Kremlin sources, named different dates for the referendum on the Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR) and the Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR). Five days before the war, it claimed that Russia had no plans to attack Ukraine.

Screenshot of Meduza's homepage

Official website

Inside Putin's mind

Ivan Kolpakov, Meduza's editor-in-chief, did not answer where these sources work or whether any of them are current Kremlin officials.

However, the most surprising thing is not the erroneous forecasts but that the publication dared to publish anonymous sources' accounts of what is going on in the minds of Putin and his subordinates. Here are some examples of such statements:

"There is an understanding (among the elite), or wishful thinking, that he (Putin) will not run the state in the fairly foreseeable future."

"Putin hates Lukashenko to the point of shaking."

"Putin approves of..."

"Putin remembers the 90s very well."

"Putin can't wait."

The problem with false forecasts

Meduza's false forecasts would have remained its problem if not for the many people who read them, who then used them to make important decisions about their future.

For example, in May, the newspaper promised that "we shouldn't wait for mobilization in Russia.” But when mobilization was announced, "a source close to the presidential administration" pledged that it would take place like this: "They will invite people to verify the data. They will insistently offer to sign the contract voluntarily. Many will be pressured. Those who disagree will be released and mobilized later."

Once again, the forecast did not come true.

In practice, the most common mobilization scenario looked like this: a person showed up for verification of documents but was immediately sent to a collection point, to a training unit, and then to the front line.

But the essential prediction of Meduza was the decision to go to war. On Feb. 18, 2022, five days before the invasion of Ukraine, "Kremlin sources" told the publication that Putin was not planning to recognize the LNR and DNR as independent republics in the short term. No war, the sources claimed, was planned, and "the constant statements [by U.S. intelligence] about new invasion dates are getting tiresome."

Once again, the forecast did not come true, but the Kremlin "insiders" in the Meduza have become even more numerous than before the war.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Lithium Mines In Europe? A New World Of Supply-Chain Sovereignty

The European Union has a new plan that challenges the long-established dogmas of globalization, with its just-in-time supply chains and outsourcing the "dirty" work to the developing world.

Photo of an open cast mine in Kalgoorlie, Australia.

Open cast mine in Kalgoorlie, Australia.

Pierre Haski


PARIS — It is one of the great paradoxes of our time: in order to overcome some of our dependencies and vulnerabilities — revealed in crises like COVID and the war in Ukraine — we risk falling into other dependencies that are no less toxic. The ecological transition, the digitalization of our economy, or increased defense needs, all pose risks to our supply of strategic minerals.

The European Commission published a plan this week to escape this fate by setting realistic objectives within a relatively short time frame, by the end of this decade.

This plan goes against the dogmas of globalization of the past 30 or 40 years, which relied on just-in-time supply chains from one end of the planet to the other — and, if we're being honest, outsourced the least "clean" tasks, such as mining or refining minerals, to countries in the developing world.

But the pendulum is now swinging in the other direction, if possible under better environmental and social conditions. Will Europe be able to achieve these objectives while remaining within the bounds of both the ecological and digital transitions? That is the challenge.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest