When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

How Putin Reads Tolstoy: The Case For A Hard Line Against Russian Culture

From ballet to opera to classic literature, Russia has turned its culture into an instrument for its own expansion. The West must fight back, Ukraine's culture minister Oleksandr Tkachenko writes in an op-ed in German daily Die Welt. It's time to stop supporting Russian artists and seek out Ukrainians instead.

Photo of Anna Netrebko

The pro-Putin singer Anna Netrebko during the last representation of Aida in Vienna in January

Oleksandr Tkatschenko*

-OpEd-

KYIV — At first glance, it seems only a small administrative act: on Jan. 25, Vladimir Putin changed the mission of his country's state cultural policy. Its task now includes "protecting society from external ideological expansion."

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Behind this change lies the idea that there are "unfriendly states involved in activities aimed at undermining the cultural sovereignty of the Russian Federation." What is at stake is nothing less than the "protection of historical truth."

Culture is thus a tool and even a weapon in the hands of the state. Russia actively uses it to promote its interests — from making Russian ballet and other symbols of Russian culture (Leo Tolstoy, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Piotr Tchaikovsky, Dmitri Shostakovich) popular, to protecting the rights of Russian speakers abroad.

It is time to do something about this.


Unfortunately, most European countries have still not understood that violence is the basis of the Russian ideological value system — and that culture is an instrument to enforce this ideology.

Weapons for Putin's ideology

For example, the organizers of the International May Festival in Wiesbaden, one of the oldest theater and music festivals in Germany.

She is part of the Putin system.

There, they continue to hold on to the performance of Russian singer Anna Netrebko. Two Ukrainian participants in the festival (musicians from the Symphony Orchestra of the National Philharmonic of Ukraine and the Choir of the Ukrainian National Opera) have already pulled out because of this.

Anna Netrebko is a part of the Putin system. She should not be given a stage, a boycott would be the appropriate reaction. This has already happened with Russian pop singer Philipp Kirkorov, who was supposed to tour Germany. His performances have now been canceled.

Kirkorov traveled to Russian military bases in the annexed Crimea after the war began and gave two concerts there. He also found time on his trip to visit a hospital treating Russian soldiers wounded during the invasion of Ukraine. In an interview with Crimean journalists, Kirkorov referred to these soldiers as "brave warriors whose performance is priceless."

Tolstoy on May 23, 1908 at Yasnaya Polyana, lithograph print by Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky. Symbols of Russian culture, such as Tolstoy, are used for propaganda purposes by Putin.

Wikipedia

Sanctioning Russian artists

Netrebko and Kirkorov, as well as more than a hundred Kremlin supporters, including singers, television hosts, film actors, and other Russian propagandists, were included in Ukraine's sanctions list, which was signed by President Volodymyr Zelensky in early January.

The International Working Group on Sanctions against Russia, together with the Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine, created a carefully-developed roadmap of recommended individual sanctions.

Therefore, the time has come for all democratic states to include in their sanctions lists those individuals who have so far been spared.

Victoria Poleva is a famous contemporary Ukrainian composer

Wikipedia

Promoting Ukrainian artists instead

Ukrainian culture is rich in artists who are in no way inferior to Russian ones. I am thinking of the European premieres of contemporary Ukrainian composers, including Zoltan Almashi's string orchestra work "Maria's City" (commemorating the destruction of Mariupol), Victoria Poleva's "Bucha. Lacrimosa" or Evgeni Orkin's "Odesa Rhapsody."

Where was your wonderful, sophisticated music before?

I think of the music of Maksym Berezovsky and Boris Lyatoshynsky, of Miroslav Skoryk and Valentyn Sylvestrov.

Their works were played in the most prestigious halls in Germany. A large audience could feel the originality of Ukrainian music and its inseparability from European music.

And often foreigners have a question: "Where was your wonderful, sophisticated music before? Why didn't we hear it?" The answer is simple: because so much more attention was paid to Tchaikovsky, Shostakovich or Rachmaninov.

Unlike Russian artists, Ukrainian ones had no lobby among music agents. They were constantly on the road in Russia, generously sponsored by Russian companies. In addition, many cultural assets are professionally packaged into "a tradition" by experienced Russian propagandists. They seduce the whole world to endlessly chew the same "cultural bubble gum."

*Oleksandr Tkachenko is Ukraine's Minister of Culture and Information Policy.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest