When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

GAZETA WYBORCZA

Why Poland Rejects Its Best And Brightest

Graduates who come back to Poland after earning prestigious degrees at Oxford or Cambridge often find themselves shut out of the labor market. Blame a mix of suspicion and envy.

Members of the Oxford University Polish Society
Members of the Oxford University Polish Society
Magdalena Szwarc

WARSAW — If you hear Polish Oxford graduates saying they want to work in Poland, there must be something wrong with them. At least, according to Polish employers.

An increasing share of young Poles with Oxford, Cambridge or Harvard diplomas in their hands choose to come back and start their promising careers in Poland. They expect competition and promotion to be easier. What they find is a long road from door to door, with none of them open.

Jakub Szamalek, 28, had a master's degree in archeology from Oxford and a PhD from Cambridge when he came back to Poland two years ago. "In the Anglo-Saxon world, an "Oxbridge" diploma — common shorthand for Oxford and Cambridge — is the magic key that unlocks the door to success," Szamalek said.

Writing his thesis, Szamalek realized that an academic career wasn't his lifelong dream after all. Writing novels became his new source of satisfaction. He did not hesitate for a second when he found a copywriter position at a Polish game production company. But the company's recruiters considered his "Oxbridge background" more as an interesting fact than as a serious asset. What made him get the job wasn't his prestigious diplomas — it was his great writing skills.

"In London, Montreal or New York, I would have never had the chance to get a position like that," Szamalek said. "I would have had to compete with people perfectly qualified for this type of work."

His wife didn't have as much luck. A graduate of the universities of Bristol, Geneva and Cambridge — and a PhD graduate in geochemistry — she turned down many offers abroad to stay with Szamalek in Poland. She sent over 100 applications and stayed unemployed for about six months. Employers, she said, were afraid she would be a "know-it-all." Her desire to work in Poland despite such a brilliant background was also seen as suspicious by many.

"Just another mouth to feed"

"If you can earn money for what you do, why don't you do it in your native country?" Przemek asked. Now 35, he spent seven years studying and working in Oxford. Przemek, despite many efforts, never felt entirely at home in England.

"When a British man said something was OK, I never knew whether he really meant it," he said. When he tried to drill down on conversations "the Polish way," people would start feeling irritated.

When Przemek came back to Poland, he realized the extent of people's lack of knowledge about science outside of the country. "I was just another mouth to feed for them," he said. He finally found several institutions working on global projects, but was only offered a part-time contract with a low salary.

Krzysztof Koczynski, a 26-year-old political science graduate, is also disappointed with what he found on his return. He moved to Warsaw after four years spent in Canada and two in Oxford. Koczynski had never really considered leaving his country once and for all. After sending off twenty applications, he got three interviews. "I would ask every time: "what will I learn with you?"," Koczynski said. He heard the same answer over and over. "You're here to work," they all told him. "If you want to grow, do it in your spare time."

The young graduate ended up working as a journalist for a pan-European publication, where he was able to receive training. But again, his Oxford degree wasn't decisive in the media's decision to hire him. If Koczynski now enjoys a "European work culture", his income remains below the Warsaw average. His temporary work contract doesn't guarantee him any access to social security or retirement benefits.

"We don't know what you learned there"

Anna Zolkiewickz is only one year older. She earned a degree in linguistics from Oxford and speaks five languages — English, French, Spanish, German, and, of course, her native Polish. She came back to Poland with the goal of working in marketing. Visiting career fairs in Gdansk, in northern Poland, she hoped the word "Oxford" would echo among employers. Zolkiewickz was turned down at many stands.

"People pulled faces and said I should have studied marketing, law or finance, preferably in Poland," she said. "Marketing departments don't accept candidates from abroad." The 50 resumes she sent all got negative responses.

"We don’t know what you learned there after all," Zolkiewickz heard many times while trying to follow up on her applications. "Maybe you know nothing at all."

Three months later, she decided to try the London market. The recruitment process was similar for many marketing agencies — a mathematics test, then two interviews followed by an answer two weeks later. Rejections were frustrating, as they would always come with an explanation. "We would like to congratulate you on your education and achievements, but having 187 candidates, we chose those more experienced," she read once. Yet she was encouraged to call back and get a feedback about her performance at interviews.

Zolkiewickz eventually got three positive answers, and had the luxury to choose the best offer. Three years later, she is now in charge of a marketing department.

"We hire people with diverse educational backgrounds," Zolkiewickz said. Marketing graduates are obviously welcome, but she is convinced that they are not better prepared for the job than she was. Daily missions require the ability to think analytically and out of the box. This is something she learned at Oxford, where independent thinking is key.

Zolkiewickz feels very happy with her current situation. She however misses her relatives and would rather be closer to them. "Sometimes, I wonder," she said. "Why didn't I succeed in my own country?"

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

When Did Putin "Turn" Evil? That's Exactly The Wrong Question

Look back over the past two decades, and you'll see Vladimir Putin has always been the man revealed by the Ukraine invasion, an evil and sinister dictator. The Russian leader just managed to mask it, especially because so many chose to see him as a typically corrupt and greedy strongman who could be bribed or reasoned with.

Putin arrives for a ceremony to accept credentials from 24 foreign ambassadors at the Grand Kremlin Palace on Sept. 20.

Sergiy Gromenko*

-OpEd-

KYIV — The world knows that Vladimir Putin has power, money and mistresses. So why, ask some, wasn't that enough for him? Why did he have to go start another war?

At its heart, this is the wrong question to ask. For Putin, military expansion is not an adrenaline rush to feed into his existing life of luxury. On the contrary, the shedding of blood for the sake of holding power is his modus operandi, while the fruits of greed and corruption like the Putin Palace in Gelendzhik are more like a welcome bonus.

In the last year, we have kept hearing rhetorical questions like “why did Putin start this war at all, didn't he have enough of his own land?” or “he already has Gelendzhik to enjoy, why fight?” This line of thinking has resurfaced after missile strikes on Ukrainian power grids and dams, which was regarded by many as a simple demonstration of terrorism. Such acts are a manifestation of weakness, some ask, so is Putin ready to show himself weak?

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

However, you will not arrive at the correct answer if the questions themselves are asked incorrectly. For decades, analysts in Russia, Ukraine, and the West have been under an illusion about the nature of the Russian president's personal dictatorship.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ