When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Egypt

Why Egypt Is So Vulnerable To Melting Glaciers And Rising Seas

Is Egypt ready?
Is Egypt ready?
Isabel Esterman

CAIRO — With its densely populated coasts and low-lying agricultural areas, Egypt is one of the most vulnerable countries to rising sea levels.

According to World Bank data, a one-meter rise in the sea level would inundate a quarter of the Nile Delta and force 10.5 million people from their homes. Rising sea waters would also leave the soil in many of Egypt's traditional agricultural areas unfit for planting, destroy critical wetland habitats, wipe out coastal industry and tourism infrastructure, and possibly intrude on fresh water aquifers.

The seas have already started rising. Ice caps and glaciers are melting, and warmer weather is driving thermal expansion (when water heats up, it takes up more space). Scientists observed that the global mean sea level rose as much as 20 centimeters during the 20th century, and that the level of increase accelerated beginning in the 1990s, reaching around 3.2 millimeters per year.

Although there is still debate among scientists about how fast and how high the world's oceans will rise, there is little doubt that the seas will get higher in the coming decades.

But will Egypt be ready? According to a panel discussion on the subject, held recently as part of the Cairo Climate Talks, the answer is maybe.

Khaled Kheir Eddin, head of the Environment and Climate Change Research Unit at Egypt's Water Ministry, points to Egypt's collection of official strategy papers devoted to this issue as a sign that the government is taking preparations seriously.

In 2011, Egypt's Information and Decision Support Center (IDSC) think tank published a set of recommendations about what kinds of projects should be prioritized, rather than a concrete plan with specific projects, benchmarks and timelines.

A 2013 strategy document from the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation is similar. It offers slightly more detail about specific projects but notes that "extensive" studies are still needed before such adaptation measures can be put in place.

Reports like these indicate that decision makers are aware of the problem and are taking it seriously. But with the need to strike a delicate balance between competing interests, turning this awareness into action on the ground will probably prove challenging.

The Water Ministry estimates that measures to adapt to climate change could cost in excess of 180 billion Egyptian pounds ($23 billion) by 2050, a tough sell at a time when the government is trying to trim its budget deficit. "From the point of view of the decision maker, he will compromise between what the country needs now and what the country needs in 50 years," says Kheir Eddin.

Balancing interests

Lawmakers will also inevitably face conflicts between competing interests, says Mohamed Bayoumi, an environment specialist at the United Nations Development Program. Farmers, fishermen, industrialists, beach-goers, city dwellers and wildlife should all be taken into account when planning for a rise in sea level, but their needs aren't all the same.

"It's quite tough to find a win-win situation for everybody," Bayoumi says. "Sometimes, some institutions are not going to be happy with what they will get, but the national interest should come out ahead."

Experts agree that in order for Egypt to prepare for rising sea levels, the issue of climate change will have to be "mainstreamed," with all ministries — from housing to defense — making decisions with climate change in mind.

Such a system is possible, explains Hamburg University's Peter Link. The German government has identified 17 human uses and ecological functions along the Wadden Sea, which stretches across the coasts of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Any plans to develop or protect the coast must balance interests as varied as oil drilling, mussel farming and protected areas for birds.

Thanks to a combination of expertise, computer algorithms and political will, the system manages to function. "Once the plan is finalized, then people adhere to it," Link says. "Germans are renowned for making the most rules in the world and sticking to them. Sometimes this is quite hindering, sometimes it is quite helpful. In this case, if you look at coastal zone management, it is useful."

In Egypt, by contrast, people don't even follow building regulations designed to protect their safety and the integrity of the coast, Kheir Eddin says. "This needs enforcement, and raising public awareness."

Egypt's situation is even more challenging when relatively certain changes like rising sea levels are coupled with harder-to-predict phenomena such as shifting weather patterns.

Some climate change models predict that the flow of the Nile will decrease, while others speculate the exact opposite. Egypt could get wetter, or it could get drier, or perhaps both in sequence.

This means that Egypt's attempts to plan for climate change have to take both wet and dry scenarios into account. Uncertainty about the future makes it hard for most people to come to grips with climate change, and therefore reluctant to make short-term sacrifices for long-term gain.

"There are things that cannot be argued in terms of climate change," Bayoumi says. "These need not to be mixed up with the projections." To raise public awareness, issues need to be placed in their proper proportion. "Not to over-exaggerate, not to underestimate. Not to think about it as a science fiction story. Not to panic."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

How Biden's Mideast Stance Weakens Israel And Emboldens Iran

The West's decision to pressure Israel over Gaza, and indulge Iran's violent and troublesome regime, follows the U.S. Democrats' line with the Middle East: just keep us out of your murderous affairs.

Photo of demonstration against U.S President Joe Biden in Iran

Demonstration against U.S President Joe Biden in Iran.

Bahram Farrokhi

-OpEd-

The Israeli government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is weak both structurally and for its dismal popularity level, which has made it take some contradictory, or erratic, decisions in its war against Hamas in Gaza.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Other factors influencing its decisions include the pressures of the families of Hamas hostages, and the U.S. administration's lukewarm support for this government and entirely reactive response to the military provocations and "hit-and-run" incidents orchestrated by the Islamic Republic of Iran and its allies, which include Hamas. Israel has also failed to mobilize international opinion behind its war on regional terrorism, in what might be termed a full-blown public relations disaster.

The administration led by President Joe Biden has, by repeating the Democrats' favored, and some might say feeble, policy of appeasing Iran's revolutionary regime, duly nullified the effects of Western sanctions imposed on that regime. By delisting its proxies, the Houthis of Yemen, as terrorists, the administration has allowed them to devote their energies to firing drones and missiles across the Red Sea and even indulging in piracy. The general picture is of a moment of pitiful weakness for the West, in which Iran and other members of the Axis - of Evil or Resistance, take your pick - are daily cocking a snook at the Western powers.

You wonder: how could the United States, given its military and technological resources, fail to spot tankers smuggling out banned Iranian oil through the Persian Gulf to finance the regime's foreign entanglements, while Iran is able to track Israeli-owned ships as far aways as the Indian Ocean? The answer, rather simply, lies in the Biden administration's decision to indulge the ayatollahs and hope for the best.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest