November 26, 2013
BEIJING — Beijing’s divorce numbers have soared to 39,075 couples so far this year, a whopping 41% increase over the same period last year. A similar trend is happening in Shanghai, where the divorce rate has risen by 39.6%.
Between 2008 and 2011, the divorce rate in these two cities never exceeded 10%. But the data indicate that things began to change in 2012, when both places saw a significant upward trend of 15% and 12.6%, respectively.
Jinyuan (not his real name) has a Beijing household registration permit, whereas his wife has a non-local household registration. They already own two apartments, so they are not entitled a buy a third in Beijing. Earlier this year, Jinyuan and his wife divorced and registered both properties under his wife’s name so that he could buy another property in his name.
Huang Bin (a pseudonym) and his wife, living in Wuhan city, were divorced last month for the same reason. Though they already own two properties, neither is located in a good school district. The couple want to plan ahead, as their 3-year-old son is approaching school age.
Following a real estate agent’s suggestion, the couple got a divorce and separated the ownership of their properties, each taking one. “We are obliged by the government’s policy,” Huang says helplessly. Now Huang can not only buy another flat, but he also gains the advantage of a lower down payment and a preferential interest rate for the mortgage.
Huang says he saw many other couples also faking divorces. “It’s very easy to tell,” he says. “They are the couples who, after the divorce registration, ask how to obtain a Single Status Certificate straight away. Besides, on the certificate they always fill in the column for the certificate use as for buying property.”
Hu Jinghui, vice president of a Beijing real estate company, says it’s difficult to estimate how much fake divorces affect Beijing’s property transactions. “For instance, for the first three quarters of this year, there were over 10,000 Beijing couples faking divorce to buy property,” he says. “But in the same period, Beijing’s total transaction volume was over 200,000 units. The proportion of couples who divorced so as to buy second houses is a mere 5%. It isn’t as important as it is made out to be.”
It’s obvious that what is driving the rise in divorce rates are new property-buying restrictions in Beijing and Shanghai. “From a statistical perspective, it is indeed abnormal this year,” says Li Ziwei, secretary general of the Beijing Marriage and Family Construction Association, confirming the rising divorce rate.
She says that although the divorce rate is bound also to rise from legitimate cases, it is also subject to external economic impacts such as government policy. “For instance, the national policy introduced in March this year — in which it stipulates a 20% income tax for profits made from selling one’s secondary housing — has led to fake divorces to circumvent the tax hit.”
Li also points out that compared with other countries, China’s property price-income ratio shows a prominent contradiction. “The authority indeed needs a policy to curb housing prices,” she says. “But at the same time, we can’t really blame people who divorce for buying houses. It’s a special phenomenon that should be looked at rationally.”
Divorce in China is easy peasy
It is easy to get divorced in China, as this newspaper discovered from Beijing’s Haidian District Civil Affairs Bureau’s Marriage Registry Office. As long as the required identifications and the divorce agreement are brought along, divorce proceedings happen without any delay. And people can apply for the Single Status Certificate as quickly as two days after a divorce.
One anonymous real estate agent says that couples who fake their divorce to buy or sell houses account for about 20-30% of his agency’s business. They tend to be either first-time buyers who want preferential mortgage conditions, couples who to buy a third house, or those trying to circumvent the income tax levy.
In addition to false divorces, sham marriages in China have also affected Beijing’s divorce rate and created a lucrative market. For instance, since people without a Beijing household registration are allowed to buy only one property there, people sometimes marry locals to purchase properties before getting divorced again right afterwards. Last July, one Beijing woman was found to have gotten married and divorced three times with three different men within a period of five months to help these non-locals purchase homes.
The divorce trend is a byproduct of a tightening Chinese-style property control policy. A serious decision even for a fake divorce is, alas, often decided hastily and can lead to potential problems for many marriages. In fact, for certain families the fake divorces have been a self-fulfilling prophecy.
“I have often had to advise couples not to take their marriages for gambling stakes,” says Li Ziwei. Two months ago, Beijing’s Haidian District Court tried a fake divorce case in which the husband refused to remarry his first wife because he planned to marry another new love. Afterwards, the Haidian court issued a warning document of sorts to alert couples about the risks of divorcing to buy property.
“Faking a divorce for buying property matters less still. After all, the couples will remarry again afterwards. What causes a bigger impact is levying a tax for the second property. Not only do divorcing couples sometimes not remarry, but young couples won’t bother to be joined in wedlock. They’ll simply have to cohabitate,” predicts Meng Xiaosu, president of China Real Estate Development Group, about the social changes government policies can provoke.
In the end, whether the Chinese real estate mechanism can lead in the long-term to a healthy lifestyle and family values has yet to be seen.
The Economic Observer is a weekly Chinese-language newspaper founded in April 2001. It is one of the top business publications in China. The main editorial office is based in Beijing, China. Inspired by the Financial Times of Britain, the newspaper is printed on peach-colored paper.
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
A neo-Nazi has been buried in the former grave of a Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender – not an oversight, but a deliberate provocation. This is just one more example of antisemitism on the rise in Germany, and society's inability to respond.
Eva Marie Kogel
October 24, 2021
BERLIN — If you want to check the state of your society, there's a simple test: as the U.S. High Commissioner for Germany, John Jay McCloy, said in 1949, the touchstone for a democracy is the well-being of Jews. This litmus test is still relevant today. And it seems Germany would not pass.
Incidents are piling up. Most recently, groups of neo-Nazis from across the country traveled to a church near Berlin for the funeral of a well-known far-right figure. He was buried in the former grave of Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender, a gravesite chosen deliberately by the right-wing extremists.
The incident at the cemetery
They intentionally chose a Jewish grave as an act of provocation, trying to gain maximum publicity for this act of desecration. And the cemetery authorities at the graveyard in Stahnsdorf fell for it. The church issued an immediate apology, calling it a "terrible mistake" and saying they "must immediately see whether and what we can undo."
There are so many incidents that get little to no media attention.
It's unfathomable that this burial was allowed to take place at all, but now the cemetery authorities need to make a decision quickly about how to put things right. Otherwise, the grave may well become a pilgrimage site for Holocaust deniers and antisemites.
The incident has garnered attention in the international press and it will live long in the memory. Like the case of singer-songwriter Gil Ofarim, who recently claimed he was subjected to antisemitic abuse at a hotel in Leipzig. Details of the crime are still being investigated. But there are so many other incidents that get little to no media attention.
The grave of Jewish musicologist Max Friedlaender
Crimes against Jews are rising
Across all parts of society, antisemitism is on the rise. Until a few years ago, Jewish life was seen as an accepted part of German society. Since the attack on the synagogue in Halle in 2019, the picture has changed: it was a bitter reminder that right-wing terror against Jewish people has a long, unbroken history in Germany.
Stories have abounded about the coronavirus crisis being a Jewish conspiracy; meanwhile, Muslim antisemitism is becoming louder and more forceful. The anti-Israel boycott movement BDS rears its head in every debate on antisemitism, just as left-wing or post-colonial thinking are part of every discussion.
Jewish life needs to be allowed to step out of the shadows.
Since 2015, the number of antisemitic crimes recorded has risen by about a third, to 2,350. But victims only report around 20% of cases. Some choose not to because they've had bad experiences with the police, others because they're afraid of the perpetrators, and still others because they just want to put it behind them. Victims clearly hold out little hope of useful reaction from the state – so crimes go unreported.
And the reality of Jewish life in Germany is a dark one. Sociologists say that Jewish children are living out their "identity under siege." What impact does it have on them when they can only go to nursery under police protection? Or when they hear Holocaust jokes at school?
Germany needs to take its antisemitism seriously
This shows that the country of commemorative services and "stumbling blocks" placed in sidewalks as a memorial to victims of the Nazis has lost its moral compass. To make it point true north again, antisemitism needs to be documented from the perspective of those affected, making it visible to the non-Jewish population. And Jewish life needs to be allowed to step out of the shadows.
That is the first thing. The second is that we need to talk about specifically German forms of antisemitism. For example, the fact that in no other EU country are Jewish people so often confronted about the Israeli government's policies (according to a survey, 41% of German Jews have experienced this, while the EU average is 28%). Projecting the old antisemitism onto the state of Israel offers people a more comfortable target for their arguments.
Our society needs to have more conversations about antisemitism. The test of German democracy, as McCloy called it, starts with taking these concerns seriously and talking about them. We need to have these conversations because it affects all of us. It's about saving our democracy. Before it's too late.
From Your Site Articles
- Mein Kampf And The Nazi Role In Arab Anti-Semitism - Worldcrunch ›
- Anti-Semitism In German Rap, A Loaded Question - Worldcrunch ›
- Why Sweden Has An Antisemitism Problem - Worldcrunch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Die Welt ("The World") is a German daily founded in Hamburg in 1946, and currently owned by the Axel Springer AG company, Europe's largest publishing house. Now based in Berlin, Die Welt is sold in more than 130 countries. A Sunday edition called Welt am Sonntag has been published since 1948.
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!