The Politics Behind "Visiting Your Parents" In China

China could punish citizens who are "not paying regular visits to the parents."
China could punish citizens who are "not paying regular visits to the parents."
Daniel Shadmy
Zhao Yaohui and Tian Yuan

China's amended "PRC Elderly Protection Law" has come into effect this month.

The new law stipulates that family members cannot neglect the elderly, and are required to care for their spiritual needs. Family members who live separately from their aging parents must visit them regularly. Employers, likewise, must guarantee their workers the right to have leave in order to be able to see their parents.

This new law meant to safeguard "support and caring for the elderly" has sparked significant debate in China, with some worried that the government could punish citizens it determines are "not paying regular visits to the parents."

So what does “visiting parents on a regular basis” written in state regulation actually imply?

Zhao Yaohui, Professor of National Development Research Institute of Peking University, notes that in China retirement care of the elderly typically falls solely on family members. This involves both economic support as well as daily care.

According to data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey, issued by Zhao's institute, 90% of people over 60 live in the same household, community or city as their children. Only 6.1% of the elderly have children living in other towns. But because of China's huge population, 6.1% is still a significant number of cases. Zhao says the new law is not principally a question of economic support, but is aimed at addressing the problem of old people who are left alone and unattended.

According to the survey, of China's 70 million people over 60 years of age, some 40% have some symptoms of depression. Children going home to see their parents more often can provide some relief for this psychological epidemic.

Beyond the new law's protection of children's right to take leave from work for visiting aging parents, Zhao also notes further government plans to help facilitate elderly moving to be with their children. Compared with children returning home to take care of their parents, it is easier for parents to move to where their children are.

"It would be much more costly," she says, noting that the children are usually tied to their location by their career.

Compared with the West?

In practice it is difficult to impose on employers the obligation to provide more time off specifically for elder care. For instance, they will need proof that the parent needs assistance or that there are no other children available.

Zhao says the state should find a solution to lower the barriers for the elderly to migrate to where their children live. Currently, it remains very difficult for old people to move around. For example, health insurance is fixed to the home town. When an elderly person visits his or her children in Beijing and consults a doctor there the fee won’t be reimbursed when he or she returns home.

Zhao Yaohui said it's useful to compare China’s retirement system with that of Western countries. Indeed, most Chinese people don't realize that also in the West elderly care is mostly family-based. In the Chinese imagination, all old Westerners live in nursing homes. Take the United States as an example. Fewer than 10% of old people live in nursing homes.

In the U.S. right now, the economic aspect is less of a problem because the elderly are in general better off than their children. However, Zhao pointed out, psychological problems are equally a serious issue for these old people. Long-term care for the elderly is a common issue that countries everywhere face. Indeed, there are legal regulations about children visiting their parents in the U.S. as well, including the right of employees to take leave to care for their parents.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

A Mother In Spain Denied Child Custody Because She Lives In Rural Area

A court in Spain usurps custody of the one-year-old boy living with his mother in the "deep" part of the Galicia region, forced to instead live with his father in the southern city of Marbella, which the judge says is "cosmopolitan" with good schools and medical care. Women's rights groups have taken up the mother's case.

A child in Galician countryside

Laure Gautherin

A Spanish court has ordered the withdrawal of a mother's custody of her one-year-old boy because she is living in the countryside in northwestern Spain, where the judge says the child won't have "opportunities for the proper development of his personality."

The case, reported Monday in La Voz de Galicia, has sparked outrage from a women's rights association but has also set off reactions from politicians of different stripes across the province of Galicia, defending the values of rural life.

Judge María Belén Ureña Carazo, of the family court of Marbella, a city on the southern coast of 141,000 people, has ordered the toddler to stay with father who lives in the city rather than with his mother because she was living in "deep Galicia" where the child would lack opportunities to "grow up in a happy environment."

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - October 25, 2021

Front page of La Voz de Galicia - Monday 25 October, 2021

La Voz de Galicia

Better in a "cosmopolitan" city?

The judge said Marbella, where the father lives, was a "cosmopolitan city" with "a good hospital" as well as "all kinds of schools" and thus provided a better environment for the child to thrive.

The mother has submitted a formal complaint to the General Council of the Judiciary that the family court magistrate had acted with "absolute contempt," her lawyer told La Voz de Galicia.

The mother quickly accumulated support from local politicians and civic organizations. The Clara Campoamor association described the judge's arguments as offensive, intolerable and typical of "an ignorant person who has not traveled much."

The Xunta de Galicia, the regional government, has addressed the case, saying that any place in Galicia meets the conditions to educate a minor. The Socialist party politician Pablo Arangüena tweeted that "it would not hurt part of the judiciary to spend a summer in Galicia."

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!