When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The Evolution Of Chinese Painting - How An "Old Lotus" Brought Portraits Back In Vogue

17th century portrait of Chinese poet Bai Juyi
17th century portrait of Chinese poet Bai Juyi
Spiritual Mouse Den

BEIJING - In the history of Eastern and Western art, the aesthetic standards for painting have been more or less the same. The most esteemed paintings were large scenes with people in them. They can be broken down into the two categories, of either historical or religious nature.

The classic scene of Christ being taken down from the cross naturally involves a lot of other characters, the Virgin Mary and the repented Mary Magdalene being the most familiar. Where more than one person was depicted, the painting required both more skill and more effort.

In China, religion was relatively less important. Nevertheless, the paintings can be also divided in two categories, depicting either emperors and lords or the religious themes of Buddhism and Taoism.

However, as the Chinese dynasties progressed the way people were depicted in paintings changed. Painted during the Six Dynasties (220-589 AD) – a period of disunity, instability and warfare – the famous “Nymph of the Luo River,” by Gu Kaizhi, shows human figures that are bigger than the mountains and the trees.

But by the High Tang Dynasty (late 7th to mid-8th century), the golden age in which China was at its pinnacle of culture and power, the Shan Shui(“mountain and water”) style of landscape painting in brush and ink had become the prominent art form. The painting “Emperor Ming-huang’s Journey to Shu,” by Li Zhaodao, shows Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (685-762 AD) trapped in the Sichuan province during the Anshi Rebellion. The mountains are towering and majestic whereas the figures are tiny in comparison. The emperor, even though he is riding a horse, is almost too small to be seen. If one were not careful he might be overlooked entirely.

If an emperor was depicted this way in paintings, one can imagine what it was like for ordinary people. Those who painted human portraits were considered to be “craftsmen” by the landscape painters.

The three major factions of painters during the Northern Song Dynasty (960-1127) were all Shan Shui artists.

During the Southern Song Dynasty (1127-1279), apart from Liu Song Lian, who was a painter of Buddhist and Taoist themes, the four major factions of painters also mainly painted landscapes.

In the Yuan or Mongol Dynasty (1279-1368), ink monochrome landscapes were the only standard for valued painters. Ni Zan (1301-1374), one of the “Four Masters of Yuan,” never represented people, deeming that they would “sully” the painting.

Dong Qichang (1555-1636), a prominent Ming Dynasty painter as well as calligrapher, was a typical follower of Ni Zan. He rarely represented people, and when he did, they were depicted in hasty and cursory brushwork, the eyebrow and moustache blurred together without any detail.

It was the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) masters who put an end to the suppression of human depictions in painting, which had lasted a thousand years. They rejuvenated portrait painting. These masters included Wen Zhengming (1470–1559), along with his contemporaries Tang Bohu (1470-1524) and Qiu Ying (1495-1552) all from the city of Suzhou, in the province of Jiangsu in Eastern China.

The impact of Old Lotus

But it was Chen Hongshou (1598-1652), known under the sobriquet Chen Laolian ("laolian" means “old lotus”), who undoubtedly possessed the greatest skill, making the greatest impact and having the finest style.

Unlike the relaxed brushstrokes of his paintings – solid and long – the Old Lotus only lived to be 54. According to the history books, he had offended an important official and was killed. This wouldn’t be at all surprising in the chaotic times of the Ming Dynasty.

Extremely lecherous as he advanced in years, the Old Lotus more or less lived in brothels. Money did not mean much to him, but sponsoring him with the gift of a fine lady was the way to get him to work right away. One can only imagine the extraordinary vitality that he had!

The Ming Dynasty had a retro atmosphere. In art, the yardstick of aesthetics was to copy the ancient masters. Particular attention was paid not just to the appearance on the surface, but it had also to be skin deep and authentic. Old Lotus was the master of this. His paintings had the charm of the Qin and the Tang Dynasties, imprinted with the strangeness of line and elegance.

By the mid-Ching Dynasty, Chinese portrait painters were gradually released from the pressure to produce landscape paintings. And from the late-Ching Dynasty through the Nationalist period and Communist China, basically all of the Southern Chinese figure painters have absorbed their artistic nutrition from the Old Lotus.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Russia-Ukraine War

Finally Time For Negotiations? Russia And Ukraine Have The Exact Same Answer

The war in Ukraine appears to have reached a stalemate, with neither side able to make significant progress on the battlefield. A number of Western experts and politicians are now pushing for negotiations. But the irreconcilable positions of both the Russian and Ukrainian sides make such negotiations tricky, if not impossible.

photo of : Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, left, presents a battle flag to a soldier as he kisses it

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky presents a battle flag to a soldier at the Kyiv Fortress, October 1, 2023.

Ukraine Presidency/Ukrainian Pre/Planet Pix via ZUMA
Yuri Fedorov


The Russian-Ukrainian war appears to have reached a strategic impasse — a veritable stalemate. Neither side is in a position at this point to achieve a fundamental change on the ground in their favor. Inevitably, this has triggered no shortage of analysts and politicians saying it's time for negotiations.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

These conversations especially intensified after the results of the summer-autumn counteroffensive were analyzed by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Valerii Zaluzhny, with not very optimistic details.

Though there are advances of the Ukrainian army, it is mostly “stuck in minefields under attacks from Russian artillery and drones,” and there is a increasing prospect of trench warfare that “could drag on for years and exhaust the Ukrainian state.”

Zaluzhny concluded: “Russia should not be underestimated. It suffered heavy losses and used up a lot of ammunition, but it will have an advantage in weapons, equipment, missiles and ammunition for a long time," he said. "Our NATO partners are also dramatically increasing their production capacity, but this requires at least a year, and in some cases, such as aircraft and control systems, two years.”

For the Ukrainian army to truly succeed, it needs air superiority, highly effective electronic and counter-battery warfare, new technologies for mining and crossing minefields, and the ability to mobilize and train more reserves.

China and most countries of the so-called global South have expressed their support for negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Meanwhile in the West, certain influential voices are pushing for negotiations, guided by a purely pragmatic principle that if military victory is impossible, it is necessary to move on to diplomacy.

The position of the allies is crucial: Ukraine’s ability to fight a long war of attrition and eventually change the situation at the front in its favor depends on the military, economic and political support of the West. And this support, at least on the scale necessary for victory, is not guaranteed.

Still, the question of negotiations is no less complicated, as the positions of Russia and Ukraine today are so irreconcilable that it is difficult to imagine productive negotiations.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest