When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Planes, Trains And E-Scooters: Surveillance State And The End Of Freedom Of Movement

It's impossible to travel incognito on a train, and it's also difficult to walk down the street without running into surveillance cameras. Even when hiking, apps are multiplying. We can't just wander around in anonymity anymore.

Photo of Google Street View car

Google Street View car at Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

Gaspard Koenig


PARIS — A few years ago, I provoked the indignation of many readers when I confessed that I enjoyed using e-scooters in town — a subject obviously more explosive in France than pensions, surrogacy and wind energy combined.

Let them be reassured: I've given up, and even boycott them now. For a simple reason: scooter operators now ask me to scan my ID card to unlock my two-wheeled transport. It seems that many town halls have asked for this measure to be implemented in order to fine those who dangerously slalom through traffic.

It doesn't really matter: there's no way I'm handing over my biometric data to a Californian start-up to move 500 meters up the street.

This sudden policing of scooters, which doesn't seem to raise any eyebrows, is indicative of a worrying trend. The stranglehold of surveillance is closing in on our movements.

Tracking all vehicles in real time

The airplane is, naturally, the most controlled means of transportation in the world.

Since 2019, it is also impossible to take a train incognito. The SNCF, which operates most trains and subways in France, has imposed the nominative ticket on all its lines, including regional trains, despite the contrary opinion of the National Commission for Information Technology & Freedoms (CNIL), the country's data protection agency. Officially nominative tickets were implemented to fight terrorism, more likely to enrich and resell customer files, the last straw for a public company!

As for cars, once symbols of freedom, for the past ten years they have been equipped with integrated GPS systems that cannot be deactivated and whose geolocation data are transmitted directly to the manufacturer.

Since last year, following the request of the European Parliament, they have also been equipped with a black box that permanently records all driving data. If the device is for the time being strictly limited to analyzing accidents, nothing will technically prevent the public authorities from tracking every driver in real time.

There will always be valid reasons to do so: to punish drivers, to warn against bad weather, to limit pollution, and of course to fight against terrorism...

Moving tracelessly

What do we have left? Bicycles? The registration of bicycles has been mandatory since 2021. Walking? Proposals to experiment with facial recognition cameras in urban spaces are multiplying (and have been encouraged by a senatorial report last May).

Even in the countryside, pedestrians are now required by the government to download an app to report themselves to hunters... So I can only think of riding a horse as a way to move around discreetly. In my experience, it might not be impossible, but it is, however, not very convenient.

We are blindly advancing towards a fully gridded world, for which no one will have voted, but to which few will have resisted. In comparison, the fortifications of feudal cities will seem like a libertarian utopia.

Nudge replaces free will and guided interactions replace spontaneous deliberations.

This is not a technological inevitability: on the contrary, digital technology could allow us, through encryption or blockchain, to erase our footprints. This is a political and economic choice.

We thus lose an essential part of our freedom, the freedom to roam our country without being accountable, to travel without leaving any trace, to escape to another place without carrying the burden of our civil status.

Authoritarian regimes and free movement

Montaigne, the French Renaissance philosopher, knew that wandering was important to form a singular spirit. He traveled to escape, preciously preserving his "freedom to come and go" in the midst of the worst calamities of his time. A distant legacy of this humanism, the CNIL is now trying to promote in its views a fundamental right to anonymity in transport.

It is no coincidence that authoritarian regimes have always sought to control movement.

Alas, for lack of a clear legal existence (a tip to our legislators!), this right to anonymity is trampled in the making of public policies by the utilitarian holy trinity: safety, health and comfort.

Alongside this freedom to come and go, the possibility of a citizens' agora also disappears. The end of anonymity signals the crumbling of public space, a melting pot for adventurous wandering and chance encounters. By being identified as an object of surveillance and commerce, we lose our sovereignty as autonomous subjects. Nudge replaces free will and guided interactions replace spontaneous deliberations.

It is no coincidence that authoritarian regimes have always sought to control movement. The workers' passbook was introduced by emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and the identity card was made compulsory by the Vichy regime during World War II.

South Africa introduced internal passports during apartheid and China still imposes the hukou system to restrict the movement of migrant workers. Is this who we want to be like?

Gaspard Koenig is a philosopher and essayist.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Bibi Blinked: How The Ceasefire Deal Could Flip Israel's Whole Gaza War Logic

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pushed ahead a deal negotiated via Qatar, for a four-day truce and an exchange of 50 hostages for 150 Palestinian prisoners. Though the humanitarian and political pressure was mounting, Israel's all-out assault is suddenly halted, with unforeseen consequences for the future.

photo of someone holding a poster of a hostage

Families of Israeli hostages rally in Jerusalem

Nir Alon/ZUMA
Pierre Haski

Updated Nov. 22, 2023 at 8:55 p.m.


PARIS — It's the first piece of good news in 46 days of war. In the early hours of Wednesday, Israel agreed to a deal that included a four-day ceasefire and the release of some of the hostages held by Hamas — 30 children and 20 women — in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners, again women and children. The real question is what happens next.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

But first, this agreement, negotiated through the intermediary of Qatar, whose role is essential in this phase, must be implemented right away. This is a complex negotiation, because unlike the previous hostage-for-prisoner exchanges, it is taking place in the midst of a major war.

On the Palestinian side, although Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh is present in Doha, he does not make the decision alone — he must have the agreement of the leaders of the military wing, who are hiding somewhere in Gaza. It takes 24 hours to send a message back and forth. As you can imagine, it's not as simple as a phone call.

And on the Israeli side, a consensus had to be built around the agreement. Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right allies were opposed to the deal — in line with their eradication logic — even at the cost of Israeli lives. But the opposition of these discredited parties was ignored, and that will leave its mark.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest