When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .


Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Planes, Trains And E-Scooters: Surveillance State And The End Of Freedom Of Movement

It's impossible to travel incognito on a train, and it's also difficult to walk down the street without running into surveillance cameras. Even when hiking, apps are multiplying. We can't just wander around in anonymity anymore.

Photo of Google Street View car

Google Street View car at Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

Gaspard Koenig


PARIS — A few years ago, I provoked the indignation of many readers when I confessed that I enjoyed using e-scooters in town — a subject obviously more explosive in France than pensions, surrogacy and wind energy combined.

Let them be reassured: I've given up, and even boycott them now. For a simple reason: scooter operators now ask me to scan my ID card to unlock my two-wheeled transport. It seems that many town halls have asked for this measure to be implemented in order to fine those who dangerously slalom through traffic.

It doesn't really matter: there's no way I'm handing over my biometric data to a Californian start-up to move 500 meters up the street.

This sudden policing of scooters, which doesn't seem to raise any eyebrows, is indicative of a worrying trend. The stranglehold of surveillance is closing in on our movements.

Tracking all vehicles in real time

The airplane is, naturally, the most controlled means of transportation in the world.

Since 2019, it is also impossible to take a train incognito. The SNCF, which operates most trains and subways in France, has imposed the nominative ticket on all its lines, including regional trains, despite the contrary opinion of the National Commission for Information Technology & Freedoms (CNIL), the country's data protection agency. Officially nominative tickets were implemented to fight terrorism, more likely to enrich and resell customer files, the last straw for a public company!

As for cars, once symbols of freedom, for the past ten years they have been equipped with integrated GPS systems that cannot be deactivated and whose geolocation data are transmitted directly to the manufacturer.

Since last year, following the request of the European Parliament, they have also been equipped with a black box that permanently records all driving data. If the device is for the time being strictly limited to analyzing accidents, nothing will technically prevent the public authorities from tracking every driver in real time.

There will always be valid reasons to do so: to punish drivers, to warn against bad weather, to limit pollution, and of course to fight against terrorism...

Moving tracelessly

What do we have left? Bicycles? The registration of bicycles has been mandatory since 2021. Walking? Proposals to experiment with facial recognition cameras in urban spaces are multiplying (and have been encouraged by a senatorial report last May).

Even in the countryside, pedestrians are now required by the government to download an app to report themselves to hunters... So I can only think of riding a horse as a way to move around discreetly. In my experience, it might not be impossible, but it is, however, not very convenient.

We are blindly advancing towards a fully gridded world, for which no one will have voted, but to which few will have resisted. In comparison, the fortifications of feudal cities will seem like a libertarian utopia.

Nudge replaces free will and guided interactions replace spontaneous deliberations.

This is not a technological inevitability: on the contrary, digital technology could allow us, through encryption or blockchain, to erase our footprints. This is a political and economic choice.

We thus lose an essential part of our freedom, the freedom to roam our country without being accountable, to travel without leaving any trace, to escape to another place without carrying the burden of our civil status.

Authoritarian regimes and free movement

Montaigne, the French Renaissance philosopher, knew that wandering was important to form a singular spirit. He traveled to escape, preciously preserving his "freedom to come and go" in the midst of the worst calamities of his time. A distant legacy of this humanism, the CNIL is now trying to promote in its views a fundamental right to anonymity in transport.

It is no coincidence that authoritarian regimes have always sought to control movement.

Alas, for lack of a clear legal existence (a tip to our legislators!), this right to anonymity is trampled in the making of public policies by the utilitarian holy trinity: safety, health and comfort.

Alongside this freedom to come and go, the possibility of a citizens' agora also disappears. The end of anonymity signals the crumbling of public space, a melting pot for adventurous wandering and chance encounters. By being identified as an object of surveillance and commerce, we lose our sovereignty as autonomous subjects. Nudge replaces free will and guided interactions replace spontaneous deliberations.

It is no coincidence that authoritarian regimes have always sought to control movement. The workers' passbook was introduced by emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and the identity card was made compulsory by the Vichy regime during World War II.

South Africa introduced internal passports during apartheid and China still imposes the hukou system to restrict the movement of migrant workers. Is this who we want to be like?

Gaspard Koenig is a philosopher and essayist.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Big Brother For The People: India's CCTV Strategy For Cracking Down On Police Abuse

"There is nothing fashionable about installing so many cameras in and outside one’s house," says a lawyer from a Muslim community. And yet, doing this has helped members of the community prove unfair police action against them.

A woman is walking in the distance while a person holds a military-style gun close up

Survellance and tight security at the Lal Chowk area in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India on October 4, 2022

Sukanya Shantha

MUMBAI — When sleuths of the National Investigating Agency suddenly descended on human rights defender and school teacher Abdul Wahid Shaikh’s house on October 11, he knew exactly what he needed to do next.

He had been monitoring the three CCTVs that are installed on the front and the rear of his house — a chawl in Vikhroli, a densely populated area in suburban Mumbai. The cameras told him that a group of men and women — some dressed in Mumbai police’s uniform and a few in civil clothes — had converged outside his house. Some of them were armed and few others with batons were aggressively banging at the door asking him to immediately let them in.

This was not the first time that the police had landed at his place at 5 am.

When the policemen discovered the CCTV cameras outside his house, they began hitting it with their batons, destroying one of them mounted right over the door. This action was captured by the adjacent CCTV camera. Shaikh, holed up in his house with his wife and two children, kept pleading with the police to stop destroying his property and simply show them an official notice.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest