When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Spain

Measuring Soccer ‘Genius’ Lionel Messi Against The All-Time Best, And Worst

Argentine-born Lionel Messi has just been named FIFA’s player of the year for the third year running, further proof that the 24-year-old Barcelona striker is already a living legend. But who was the soccer world’s worst player in 2011?

In Buenos Aires, Argentina (above) Lionel Messi enjoys larger than life hero status
In Buenos Aires, Argentina (above) Lionel Messi enjoys larger than life hero status
Fred Hirzel

GENEVA -- It's next to impossible to think of something original to write about Lionel Messi, who at just 24 years of age has just been awarded FIFA's Ballon d'Or – and thus recognized as the world's greatest soccer player – for the third consecutive year. Only France's Michel Platini, who won the award in 1983, 84 and 85, ever accomplished such a feat.

I could write that the Argentine star is a tiny genius, that he has the trickiest and most inventive left foot since Diego Maradona, his legendary compatriot. But everyone knows that already. Or I could say that he's a freak of nature. Indeed, he suffered from a kind of dwarfism as a child. But that's hardly a scoop either.

So, instead of resorting to all the normal clichés or lauding Messi with heaps of well-deserved superlatives, I'm just going to let Johan Cruyff, a soccer giant in his own right, do the talking for me. "Messi will be the player who ends up winning the most Ballon d'Or trophies in history," Cruyff, a three-time Ballon d'Or winner, told the Argentine newspaper Olé. "He'll win five, six, seven! There's no one that compares to him. He plays in another dimension."

Bixente Lizarazu, a member of France's 1998 World Cup champion team, says Messi's worth his weight in gold. "Messi's a genius," said Lizarazu, currently a commentator with the French channel TF1. Compared to the Ballon d'Or runner up, Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal, Messi has "something extra…an ability to switch between an individual and the team style of play that makes him more versatile than Cristiano. His game is more surprising," said Lizarazu.

The third place finisher was Xavi Hernández, one of Messi's Barcelona teammates. If it weren't for Messi, most soccer experts agree, Hernández would likely have won his own Ballon d'Or award by now, especially in 2010, when he anchored Spain's World Cup championship team. But then, as now, his path was blocked by the Argentine ace.

And the worst player award goes to…

Alchemists once tried to turn lead into gold. I'm going to attempt the opposite by turning my attention now to the "Ballon de Plomb" (lead ball), a parody award for the world's most disappointing player. On Monday, the Cahiers du Football website gave the dubious distinction to Moussa Maazou of Nigeria. The runner up was André-Pierre Gignac of France.

On loan to Bordeaux from CSKA Moscow, Maazou was banished by the French team for being abusive towards the club and its supporters. He then joined Monaco but soon injured his knee, putting him out of commission for six months. He was finally sent on loan to Waregem in Belgium, where he insisted publicly that he was every bit as good as the players from Real Madrid or Barcelona, Spain's powerhouse teams. Soon after Waregem announced it wanted to break its contract with Maazou and, according to the Cahiers du Footall site "claim compensation for the paucity of services provided."

It's almost as much fun to talk about the goats as the greats. But always better, of course, to root for the gold.

Read the original article in French

Photo - Adam Jones, Ph.D

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

India Higher Education Inferior Complex: Where Are The Foreign University Campuses?

The proposed UGC guidelines are ill-conceived and populist, and hardly take note of the educational and financial interests of foreign universities.

Image of a group of five people sitting on the grass inside of the Indian Institute of Technology campus.

The IIT - Indian Institute of Technology - Campus

M.M Ansari and Mohammad Naushad Khan

NEW DELHI — Nearly 800,000 young people from India attend foreign universities every year in search of quality education and entrepreneurial training, resulting in a massive outflow of resources – $3 billion – to finance their education. These students look for greener pastures abroad because of the lack of quality teaching and research in most of India’s higher education institutions.

Over 40,000 colleges and 1,000 universities are producing unemployable graduates who cannot function in a knowledge- and technology-intensive economy.

The Indian government's solution is to open doors to foreign universities, with a proposed set of regulations aiming to provide higher education and research services to match global standards, and to control the outflow of resources. But this decision raises many questions.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest