Italy's Ugly Exception: Why The Occupy Movement Turned Violent Only In Rome

Essay: Why was Rome the only place where the global "Occupy" and "Indignados" protests turned violent? La Stampa editor Mario Calabresi sees Italy's troubled historical relationship between social protest and v

Fire set Saturday in Rome, video image (paofredi)
Fire set Saturday in Rome, video image (paofredi)
Mario Calabresi

This past weekend, in 951 cities in 82 countries worldwide, citizens of every age, but mainly young people, rallied against a global economic system where governments save banks rather than citizens from bankruptcy. They have called themselves the Indignados, a moniker taken from the Spanish demonstrators who last spring occupied the central square Puerta del Sol, in Spain's capital Madrid, to denounce rising unemployment, spreading economic uncertainty and the privileges of the financial elites. In Italy, we call them the Indignati

Now, protests have spread across the world. In most recent weeks, the cameras have focused on New York and the occupants of Zuccotti Park, a square just a few blocks from Wall Street. There, the demonstrators have built a small camp to show the differences between the average person, who is suffering from the crisis, and the bankers who are once again receiving million-dollar bonuses. The mobilization in the U.S. has proceeded largely without incident. When accused by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg of dirtying the area, the occupants cleaned it up.

Then, on Saturday, the expression of a movement went decidedly global. In 950 cities worldwide, the rallies were peaceful, colorful and loud. In just a single location did the rally turn wild, scary and violent. It was our capital, Rome. Once again, we have put on display to the world an Italian anomaly. Once again, we should feel ashamed.

In New York, the demonstrators wore pacifist badges and held brooms and scrubbers to clean up. In Rome, they wore helmets and set off paper bombs. In Manhattan, the sound of drums and the Buddhist's OM mantra were the soundtrack, while the smell wafting through the rally from incense burned by elderly flower children.

In Italy, instead, once again the sounds were of police sirens and helicopters, and the smell of tear gas and burning cars.

Why did it happen in Rome? Why does it happen only here? Why do a few thousand young people eager to provoke a riot manage to hold hostage an entire city and a newly born movement? Why is Italy once again alone in facing violence and extremists, and crushing any hope of a pacific and useful demonstration?

I often think about our sad and ironic fate. In Italy, 1968 protests tuned into the violence and terrorism of 1977, when people, ideas and ideals were killed. On the other side of the Ocean, violence did not win. The movement which wanted to change the world, was able do it, creating alternative energy and Silicon Valley. Italy had leaders who taught violence. The United States had Steve Jobs, who used drugs indeed, but had futuristic, not apocalyptic visions.

Don't get hijacked

In Italy, this is happening all over again because we never were able to truly distance ourselves from violent acts. I say "we," because all the society should do it. Here we always hold out a "but" or "however" to justify ourselves.

Millions of Italians are outraged over the behavior of politicians, the distance between government and real people's problems, and the lack of investments for the future of the youth. There is outrage, anger and exhaustion, but they don't go burn cars and hurl stones. They view those protestors as vandals and criminals, who don't know the value of respect and have never worked for living.

Today, many people are upset by Saturday's riots. But no doubt that in a few days when the police will have identified some of the violent demonstrators, and magistrates file charges, surely too many will defend and justify the alleged perpetrators. Many will accuse judges and policemen of not really understanding the situation, and of being too tough with the young people.

This all occurs for our endemic lack of constructive thinking. If we keep saying that our youth have no future ahead of them other than decline, if we feed them only with cynicism, if we picture only catastrophic scenarios and deny them any space to hope, we will erase any possibility of change. If we say that nothing can be built, we leave space only to feed the urge to destroy.

The only chance is in those young people who refuse to listen to the pessimistic speeches, who still find a chance to dream and to hope. Hey kids, the future is yours, if you learn today to refuse violence, to isolate those who preach or commit it, to denounce it before it happens. The future exists if you build it with hope and persistence, and if you don't let it get hijacked by those who believe in nothing.

Read the original article in Italian

photo - paofredi

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!

7 Ways The Pandemic May Change The Airline Industry For Good

Will flying be greener? More comfortable? Less frequent? As the world eyes a post-COVID reality, we look at ways the airline industry has been changing through a pandemic that has devastated air travel.

Ready for (a different kind of) takeoff?

Carl-Johan Karlsson

It's hard to overstate the damage the pandemic has had on the airline industry, with global revenues dropping by 40% in 2020 and dozens of airlines around the world filing for bankruptcy. One moment last year when the gravity became particularly apparent was when Asian carriers (in countries with low COVID-19 rates) began offering "flights to nowhere" — starting and ending at the same airport as a way to earn some cash from would-be travelers who missed the in-flight experience.

More than a year later today, experts believe that air traffic won't return to normal levels until 2024.

But beyond the financial woes, the unprecedented slowdown in air travel may bring some silver linings as key aspects of the industry are bound to change once back in full spin, with some longer-term effects on aviation already emerging. Here are some major transformations to expect in the coming years:

Cleaner aviation fuel

The U.S. administration of President Joe Biden and the airline industry recently agreed to the ambitious goal of replacing all jet fuel with sustainable alternatives by 2050. Already in a decade, the U.S. aims to produce three billion gallons of sustainable fuel — about one-tenth of current total use — from waste, plants and other organic matter.

While greening the world's road transport has long been at the top of the climate agenda, aviation is not even included under the Paris Agreement. But with air travel responsible for roughly 12% of all CO2 emissions from transport, and stricter international regulation on the horizon, the industry is increasingly seeking sustainable alternatives to petroleum-based fuel.

Fees imposed on the airline industry should be funneled into a climate fund.

In Germany, state broadcaster Deutsche Welle reports that the world's first factory producing CO2-neutral kerosene recently started operations in the town of Wertle, in Lower Saxony. The plant, for which Lufthansa is set to become the pilot customer, will produce CO2-neutral kerosene through a circular production cycle incorporating sustainable and green energy sources and raw materials. Energy is supplied through wind turbines from the surrounding area, while the fuel's main ingredients are water and waste-generated CO2 coming from a nearby biogas plant.

Farther north, Norwegian Air Shuttle has recently submitted a recommendation to the government that fees imposed on the airline industry should be funneled into a climate fund aimed at developing cleaner aviation fuel, according to Norwegian news site E24. The airline also suggested that the government significantly reduce the tax burden on the industry over a longer period to allow airlines to recover from the pandemic.

Black-and-white photo of an ariplane shot from below flying across the sky and leaving condensation trails

High-flying ambitions for the sector

Joel & Jasmin Førestbird

Hydrogen and electrification

Some airline manufacturers are betting on hydrogen, with research suggesting that the abundant resource has the potential to match the flight distances and payload of a current fossil-fuel aircraft. If derived from renewable resources like sun and wind power, hydrogen — with an energy-density almost three times that of gasoline or diesel — could work as a fully sustainable aviation fuel that emits only water.

One example comes out of California, where fuel-cell specialist HyPoint has entered a partnership with Pennsylvania-based Piasecki Aircraft Corporation to manufacture 650-kilowatt hydrogen fuel cell systems for aircrafts. According to HyPoint, the system — scheduled for commercial availability product by 2025 — will have four times the energy density of existing lithium-ion batteries and double the specific power of existing hydrogen fuel-cell systems.

Meanwhile, Rolls-Royce is looking to smash the speed record of electrical flights with a newly designed 23-foot-long model. Christened the Spirit of Innovation, the small plane took off for the first time earlier this month and successfully managed a 15-minute long test flight. However, the company has announced plans to fly the machine faster than 300 mph (480 km/h) before the year is out, and also to sell similar propulsion systems to companies developing electrical air taxis or small commuter planes.

New aircraft designs

Airlines are also upgrading aircraft design to become more eco-friendly. Air France just received its first upgrade of a single-aisle, medium-haul aircraft in 33 years. Fleet director Nicolas Bertrand told French daily Les Echos that the new A220 — that will replace the old A320 model — will reduce operating costs by 10%, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by 20% and noise footprint by 34%.

International first class will be very nearly a thing of the past.

The pandemic has also ushered in a new era of consumer demand where privacy and personal space is put above luxury. The retirement of older aircraft caused by COVID-19 means that international first class — already in steady decline over the last decades — will be very nearly a thing of the past. Instead, airplane manufacturers around the world (including Delta, China Eastern, JetBlue, British Airways and Shanghai Airlines) are betting on a new generation of super-business minisuites where passengers have a privacy door. The idea, which was introduced by Qatar Airways in 2017, is to offer more personal space than in regular business class but without the lavishness of first class.

Aerial view of Rome's Fiumicino airport

Aerial view of Rome's Fiumicino airport

Hygiene rankings  

Rome's Fiumicino Airport has become the first in the world to earn "the COVID-19 5-Star Airport Rating" from Skytrax, an international airline and airport review and ranking site, Italian daily La Repubblica reports. Skytrax, which publishes a yearly annual ranking of the world's best airports and issues the World Airport Awards, this year created a second list to specifically call out airports with the best health and hygiene standards.

Smoother check-in

​The pandemic has also accelerated the shift towards contactless traveling, with more airports harnessing the power of biometrics — such as facial recognition or fever screening — to reduce touchpoints and human contact. Similar technology can also be used to more efficiently scan physical objects, such as explosive detection. Ultimately, passengers will be able to "check-in" and go through a security screening anywhere at the airports, removing queues and bottlenecks.

Data privacy issues

​However, as pointed out in Canadian publication The Lawyer's Daily, increased use of AI and biometrics also means increased privacy concerns. For example, health and hygiene measures like digital vaccine passports also mean that airports can collect data on who has been vaccinated and the type of vaccine used.

Photo of planes at Auckland airport, New Zealand

Auckland Airport, New Zealand

Douglas Bagg

The billion-dollar question: Will we fly less?

At the end of the day, even with all these (mostly positive) changes that we've seen take shape over the past 18 months, the industry faces major uncertainty about whether air travel will ever return to the pre-COVID levels. Not only are people wary about being in crowded and closed airplanes, but the worth of long-distance business travel in particular is being questioned as many have seen that meetings can function remotely, via Zoom and other online apps.

Trying to forecast the future, experts point to the years following the 9/11 terrorist attacks as at least a partial blueprint for what a recovery might look like in the years ahead. Twenty years ago, as passenger enthusiasm for flying waned amid security fears following the attacks, airlines were forced to cancel flights and put planes into storage.

40% of Swedes intend to travel less

According to McKinsey, leisure trips and visits to family and friends rebounded faster than business flights, which took four years to return to pre-crisis levels in the UK. This time too, business travel is expected to lag, with the consulting firm estimating only 80% recovery of pre-pandemic levels by 2024.

But the COVID-19 crisis also came at a time when passengers were already rethinking their travel habits due to climate concerns, while worldwide lockdowns have ushered in a new era of remote working. In Sweden, a survey by the country's largest research company shows that 40% of the population intend to travel less even after the pandemic ends. Similarly in the UK, nearly 60% of adults said during the spring they intended to fly less after being vaccinated against COVID-19 — with climate change cited as a top reason for people wanting to reduce their number of flights, according to research by the University of Bristol.

At the same time, major companies are increasingly forced to face the music of the environmental movement, with several corporations rolling out climate targets over the last few years. Today, five of the 10 biggest buyers of corporate air travel in the US are technology companies: Amazon, IBM, Google, Apple and Microsoft, according to Taipei Times, all of which have set individual targets for environmental stewardship. As such, the era of flying across the Atlantic for a two-hour executive meeting is likely in its dying days.

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!