LONG SINGU — Lost in the Malaysian forest, the village of Long Singu — on the Island of Borneo — is engaging in righteous resistence. Between 200 and 300 Penan people are refusing to leave their land to make way for the Murum dam.
“We want to keep our village and our forest,” is the refrain from young and old tribe members alike.
Their fight is a desperate one, as the the dam is nearly complete and the construction site is buzzing. All along the eight-hour trip from Miri, in the northern part of the state of Sarawak, to Long Singu, there is a constant flow of machines and trucks transporting 15- to 20-meter-long tree trunks, making circulation hazardous. There’s even a ferryboat, directly on the ground and right in the middle of the luxuriant vegetation. It was put there because it will take away the debris once the valley is under water — proof that everything here will soon disappear.
The road to Long Singu is interrupted by numerous check points, where we must show our vehicle registration and leave our ID with agents posted behind the barriers set up by the Malaysian company Shin Yang, the initials of which can be seen on the side of the work trucks. At the end of the journey, we finally discover a wooden shelter built on piles, hidden among the trees. Each Penan family occupies one “door” and the two or three rooms behind it. On that recent evening, several members of the Penan tribe left to obstruct the Murum dam. Women and children stayed behind.
After nightfall, the noises of animals invade the house: squeaking, growling, hooting, each responding to the others. During dinner, which consists of rice, a soup made with wild pig’s feet and fruits from the forest, a few Penan people come to discuss their opposition to the dam. We meet in the “shepherd's house,” where the rare visitors stay.
“Tell the whole world what they’re doing to the Penan,” says one 70-year-old tribesman. “My name is Karang Bo. I was born here and I don’t want to leave. Birds, pigs, monkeys: The animals are all fleeing. We even find fewer and fewer fish because of the polluted water.”
The Penan flatly reject the “progress” promised by the government. “We want to develop, but we don’t want others to decide for us,” says Minah Siap, a woman of 25, holding her three children tight. In the middle of the humid night, and with small lamps connected to a generator offering the only feeble light, 35-year-old Robert Beatle, arms covered in tattoos, says angrily: “The dam is killing us all. We’re gonna blow it up with explosives!”
Defending the dams
They are at war, but their spears and their blowpipes are no match against economic interests. The excavators took their toll, and the forest with it. The worst part is still to come with the filling of reservoirs, which started in September and should take a year. It will mean flooded valleys, thousands of hectares of land under water and displaced villages. Murum will be the third dam of its kind, after those of Batang Ai and Bakun. Built by the company Sarawak Energy Berhad, it alone will produce 944 megawatts of electricity. But it’s only one piece of a huge project for another 11 dams in the state of Sarawak by 2030.
“On the River Baram, there are plans for three dams, but the construction of Baram 1 is already impeded by the Kenyah people, the Kayan and the Penan,” explains Peter Kallang, a 63-year-old engineer born in Baram who is also part of Safe Rivers, an NGO that defends displaced populations. “This dam alone affects 20,000 people in 26 villages,” he says. Hundreds of people have begun obstructing the entries to the construction site.
Sarawak Energy Berhad denounces the “false information” circulating about how it the population will be transferred. “Enough is enough,” says the impatient CEO, Datuk Torstein Dale Sjotveit. “The 2.5 million inhabitants concerned by the program want development, they want better infrastructures, hospitals and a world-class education. Why should the inhabitants of Sarawak and indigenous communities of Murum be barred from the advantages that citizens from developed nations can enjoy?”
In Sarawak — Photo: IHA Central Office
The company and the government also highlight the development of renewable energies: The dams are part of a program called SCORE, Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy. The electricity thus produced is supposed to attract several industries, including gigantic steel factories. This, however, is exactly what Peter Kallang fears. “Originally, the government wanted to dispatch this electricity to the peninsula by underwater cable and export part of it to Singapore and Thailand,” he explains. “But they abandoned the project in 1998: too expensive. Instead, the overproduction will be used to over-industrialize the region.”
As we get closer to the heavily-guarded Murum site, we can see the construction engines on the upper part of the impressive site, 140 meters high. Still, it’s no more than the little brother of the Bakun dam, a 205-meter-high and 750-meter-long giant, with eight turbines of 300 megawatts each and a detention surface equivalent to that of Singapore. Fifteen villages and 10,000 people were displaced for its construction.
A few kilometers downstream from the Murum dam, Penan people from four villages along with a group of Kenyah have been camping near a pond of stagnant water since September 17. The police forces watch, in a debonair way, as they block the way for the trucks.
Compensation in dispute
“This is the first time we come here to block, after September 2011 and August 2013. But this time we won't leave until the government pays what it owes us and agrees to save us access to the forest,” says Kilau Lait, who acts as a sort of spokesman for the group, with his cellphone constantly pressed hard against his ear. He explains they deserve compensation for the loss of their homes: “The state had promised to give each family 50,000 ringgits ($15,000). It only paid 10,000 ($3,000)."
Five hundred kilometers away from Long Singu, Kilau Lait’s friend Lugan Usang is on a mission. As one of the five representatives of the village, he’s holding a press conference. His predecessor was dismissed by the inhabitants because he had recommended they stop fighting. “The government pays the leaders of the communities and controls them,” Peter Kallang explains. “Sarawak’s prime minister and his family control everything. They have interests in palm oil, wood, electricity. People are scared and they don’t know their rights.”
Unimpressed by the big town of Miri and its 300,000 inhabitants, 23-year-old Lugan admits he personally is ready to move there in order to earn more. He gets next to nothing working in the palm plantations of Shin Yang. Although he wants to maintain his way of life, he embraces modernity. “I would like my children to go to school. But I also want them to be able, like me, to come back to the village and hunt, fish, cultivate rice and pick fruits in the forest.”
Up until the 1960s, Penan people were nomads. According to Theivanai Amarthalingam, a lawyer for the organization Friends of the Earth Malaysia, this forbade them from claiming the land promised by the state. “They had to be able to prove that in 1958, they lived on land that had been occupied by their families over several generations. And the Penan couldn’t do that,” she explains. “There are numerous disputes in courts on expropriations or buying-offs of land due to the dams and to the palm tree plantations.” The legal fight is fierce between the big companies, the state and the indigenous peoples.
But the Penan people are so few and so far away that the federal capital city Kuala Lumpur doesn’t care one bit about them. On Oct. 2, a demonstration in their favor only gathered a handful of people. “The Penan are isolated. Their cause is scarcely known because the press doesn’t talk about it,” says Harrison Ngan Laing, a lawyer for the natives in Miri. “We do win some cases, but the Penan don’t know their rights. We'll do whatever we can to obtain more compensations.”
Amid the palm trees and the dipterocarp trees, the king of the forests of Sarawak, the young mother Minah Siap says she doesn’t want to move away from Long Singu. “They’re giving us a house and a patch of land, but what we want is to keep our forest.”
The bow-and-arrow murder of five people in the small Norwegian city of Kongsberg this week was particularly chilling for the primitive choice of weapon. And police are now saying the attack Wednesday night is likely to be labeled an act of terrorism.
Still, even though the suspect is a Danish-born convert to Islam, police are still determining the motive. Espen Andersen Bråthen, a 37-year-old Danish national, is previously known to the police, both for reports of radicalization, as well as erratic behavior unrelated to religion.
Indeed, it remains unclear whether religious beliefs were behind the killings. In an interview with Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter, police attorney Ann Iren Svane Mathiassens said Bråthen has already confessed to the crimes, giving a detailed account of the events during a three-hour interrogation on Thursday, but motives are yet to be determined.
Investigated as terrorism
Regardless, the murders are likely to be labeled an act of terror – mainly as the victims appear to have been randomly chosen, and were killed both in public places and inside their homes.
Mathiassens also said Bråthen will undergo a comprehensive forensic psychiatric examination, which is also a central aspect of the ongoing investigation, according to a police press conference on Friday afternoon. Bråthen will be held in custody for at least four weeks, two of which will be in isolation, and will according to a police spokesperson be moved to a psychiatric unit as soon as possible.
Witnesses have since described him as unstable and a loner.
Police received reports last year concerning potential radicalization. In 2017, Bråthen published two videos on Youtube, one in English and one in Norwegian, announcing that he's now a Muslim and describing himself as a "messenger." The year prior, he made several visits to the city's only mosque, where he said he'd received a message from above that he wished to share with the world.
Previous criminal history
In 2012, he was convicted of aggravated theft and drug offenses, and in May last year, a restraining order was issued after Bråthen entered his parents house with a revolver, threatening to kill his father.
The mosque's chairman Oussama Tlili remembers Bråthen's first visit well, as it's rare to meet Scandinavian converts. Still, he didn't believe there was any danger and saw no reason to notify the police. Tlili's impression was rather that the man was unwell mentally, and needed help.
According to a former neighbor, Bråthen often acted erratically. During the two years she lived in the house next to him — only 50 meters from the grocery store where the attacks began — the man several times barked at her like a dog, threw trash in the streets to then pick it up, and spouted racist comments to her friend. Several other witnesses have since described him as unstable and a loner.
The man used a bow and arrow to carry the attack
Norway, with one of the world's lowest crime rates, is still shaken from the attack — and also questioning what allowed the killer to hunt down and kill even after police were on the scene.
The first reports came around 6 p.m. on Wednesday that a man armed with bow and arrow was shooting inside a grocery store. Only minutes after, the police spotted the suspect; he fired several times against the patrol and then disappeared while reinforcements arrived.
The attack has also fueled a long-existing debate over whether Norwegian police should carry firearms
In the more than 30 minutes that followed before the arrest, four women and one man were killed by arrows and two other weapons — though police have yet to disclose the other arms, daily Aftenposten reports. The sleepy city's 27,000 inhabitants are left wondering how the man managed to evade a full 22 police patrols, and why reports of his radicalization weren't taken more seriously.
With five people killed and three more injured, Wednesday's killing spree is the worst attack in Norway since far-right extremist Anders Breivik massacred 77 people on the island of Utøya a decade ago.
As questions mount over the police response to the attack, with reports suggesting all five people died after law enforcement made first contact with the suspect, local police have said it's willing to submit the information needed to the Bureau of Investigation to start a probe into their conduct. Police confirmed they had fired warning shots in connection to the arrest which, under Norwegian law, often already provides a basis for an assessment.
Wednesday's bloodbath has also fueled a long-existing debate over whether Norwegian police should carry firearms — the small country being one of only 19 globally where law enforcement officers are typically unarmed, though may have access to guns and rifles in certain circumstances.
Magnus Ranstorp, a terrorism expert and professor at the Swedish Defence University, noted that police in similar neighboring countries like Sweden and Denmark carry firearms. "I struggle to understand why Norwegian police are not armed all the time," Ranstorp told Norwegian daily VG. "The lesson from Utøya is that the police must react quickly and directly respond to a perpetrator during a life-threatening incident."
- How Terror In Norway Risks Igniting Showdown Over ... ›
- The Long War Against Terrorism: Tactics, Clarity And Resolve ... ›
- Bataclan Trial: Fighting Terrorism With Democratic Weapons ... ›