When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Switzerland

In Swiss Tri-Border Region, Citizens Extend Helping Hand To Homeless Asylum Seekers

Turned away from state centers in and around Switzerland’s Basel, some migrant asylum seekers have had no choice but to sleep on the streets. A handful of concerned citizens, however, have organized through e-mail and Facebook to offer their homes as emer

A snow storm in Basel, Switzerland (pppspics)
A snow storm in Basel, Switzerland (pppspics)
Matthias Chapman

BASEL -- In recent weeks, asylum seekers in and around the Swiss tri-border city of Basel have been turned away at supposedly full-to-beyond-capacity state centers before they even had a chance to fill out the forms necessary to request asylum. "As these people are not yet registered as asylum seekers, we don't know who they are," Michael Glauser, spokesman for the Swiss Federal Office for Migration (BFM) told the SDA press agency.

According to the BFM's most recent information, some 40 asylum seekers were turned away in Basel. There were a handful of individual cases in the nearby French-speaking canton of Vaud as well, and in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino, people were being sent on to other centers. Women and children were always taken in, said Glauser: the centers have emergency reserve capacity in case.

Solidarité sans Frontières, a Swiss organization that works with migrants and asylum seekers, said it was "shocked" by the intolerable conditions in Basel. The group refutes claims that the situation is being caused by a "flood of North African asylum seekers." The problems instead reflect systematic structural attempts to reduce services, according to Solidarité sans Frontières.

A Swiss organization that helps refugees, Schweizerische Flüchtlingshilfe (SFH), said on Wednesday that it was "extremely concerned." The group accuses Swiss authorities of violating asylum laws.

Concerned citizens

Last Sunday afternoon, Almut Rembges happened to pass the federal asylum seekers' center in Basel, where she noticed what looked like a family sitting on the ground about 200 meters from the facility. Winter had just kicked in. Weather conditions, in other words, were such that it was unlikely the family was just agreeably passing the afternoon outdoors.

"Then some other asylum seekers came up to me and asked for help," says the artist and activist. They told her the family had been turned away for lack of room at the center. Rembges went to talk to the security personnel at the door, who finally agreed to let the family in.

Rembges began to worry that what she had witnessed personally could turn into a full-blown emergency situation, with people being forced to sleep outdoors in freezing weather. That this could be happening in Switzerland is "unacceptable," she says. Rembges began patrolling the area around the center, and encouraged friends and acquaintances to do the same. "I set up a Doodle, and 20 people signed up." They take turns monitoring the entrance to the center.

But what if there really was no room at the center? That's what happened last Monday when a small group from Eritrea – three women, two children and a young man – were turned away. "I sent word out by e-mail and on Facebook and immediately people got back offering a total of 25 beds," says Rembges.

One of the people who responded was Anni Lanz, a well known migrant rights activist. "The asylum seekers from Eritrea spent the night here. We have a large guest bedroom," she says.

Before opening her home to the migrants, Lanz spoke with the head of the Basel center and asked him to accept the Eritreans. He refused, saying "they didn't have a single mattress left." That's when Lanz organized transportation for the group and offered her own place as emergency quarters.

Spagetti and a smile

For Lanz this wasn't an unusual situation. The activist, now in her 60s, is in the habit of opening her home to people who need help. She was also happy to offer her visitors a hot meal. "I made Spaghetti Napoli for the Eritreans," she says.

Does it make her feel disappointed or angry knowing she is providing services that should be offered by the state? "Naturally, I think the state should be friendlier to foreigners," she replies. "But making people welcome shouldn't just be up to the state. It should be part of our culture."

As for the cost, she says she has ample enough retirement benefits to be able to share with others. She says too that she's never had problems with anyone she reached out to. Lanz insists, furthermore, that her generosity is normal. "There are a lot of people who would act the same way I do," she says.

What does make Lanz angry is that many of those asylum seekers refused at the centers are sent to Italy, where the situation is generally far worse than it is in Switzerland. "There, they get nothing: no shelter, no food."

The good news is that the situation in Basel has improved. A bomb shelter in nearby Pratteln was opened as an emergency option and since then, Rembges says, she hasn't found anybody turned out on the street. But that doesn't mean she's ready to stop patrolling the streets. "Solutions," like the bomb shelter in Pratteln, can prove illusory. Rembges found out later, for example, that her efforts on behalf of that first family she assisted were only partially sucessful. The men ended up being turned away despite her intervention.

Read the original story in German

Photo - pppspics

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

Lex Tusk? How Poland’s Controversial "Russian Influence" Law Will Subvert Democracy

The new “lex Tusk” includes language about companies and their management. But is this likely to be a fair investigation into breaking sanctions on Russia, or a political witch-hunt in the business sphere?

Photo of President of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda

Polish President Andrzej Duda

Piotr Miaczynski, Leszek Kostrzewski

-Analysis-

WARSAW — Poland’s new Commission for investigating Russian influence, which President Andrzej Duda signed into law on Monday, will be able to summon representatives of any company for inquiry. It has sparked a major controversy in Polish politics, as political opponents of the government warn that the Commission has been given near absolute power to investigate and punish any citizen, business or organization.

And opposition politicians are expected to be high on the list of would-be suspects, starting with Donald Tusk, who is challenging the ruling PiS government to return to the presidency next fall. For that reason, it has been sardonically dubbed: Lex Tusk.

University of Warsaw law professor Michal Romanowski notes that the interests of any firm can be considered favorable to Russia. “These are instruments which the likes of Putin and Orban would not be ashamed of," Romanowski said.

The law on the Commission for examining Russian influences has "atomic" prerogatives sewn into it. Nine members of the Commission with the rank of secretary of state will be able to summon virtually anyone, with the powers of severe punishment.

Under the new law, these Commissioners will become arbiters of nearly absolute power, and will be able to use the resources of nearly any organ of the state, including the secret services, in order to demand access to every available document. They will be able to prosecute people for acts which were not prohibited at the time they were committed.

Their prerogatives are broader than that of the President or the Prime Minister, wider than those of any court. And there is virtually no oversight over their actions.

Nobody can feel safe. This includes companies, their management, lawyers, journalists, and trade unionists.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest