Society

How The Internet Plans To Cash In On You After You Die

The fate of our personal data after death has become both a legal and economic issue. Online businesses such as Facebook and Google want to be able to monetize even dead users, while some families who want to erase accounts may find it problematic.

Try
Try
Jacques Henno

PARIS — There are 580,000 funerals every year in France, and every year 23 million chrysanthemums are laid on graves to mark All Saints Day. In other words, the mourning industry is huge, generating between 2 billion and 5 billion euros a year. The market has led to the creation of many startups. For example, it's now possible to follow a burial via video conference and to scatter ashes in the upper stratosphere. For these companies, death may represent a business opportunity, but for other web-based concerns, it's an economic, legal and societal conundrum: What should we do with the digital data of dead people?

After all, keeping all of it has a cost. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 0.8% of the population dies every year. If we apply that percentage to Facebook"s 1.49 billion accounts, that's 11 million users who die every year. Their data continues to be stored, but without generating any more advertising revenue.

Destroying the data is similarly problematic. On what legal ground, and after what amount of time? Websites could risk family members filing complaints for the destruction of their loved ones' digital footprints.

Sometimes the opposite happens, when the children or parents of a deceased person try in vain to have a relative's profile removed. "We've had a few cases of families suffering from the online presence on a social network of one of their children who committed suicide," the French National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL) says.

And, says Martine Roberge, an ethnology professor at Laval University in Quebec and author of Rites of passage in the 21st century, "The online and unsolicited perpetuation of a loved one can obstruct the mourning process."

But from an anthropological viewpoint, conserving and transmitting this data to descendants are important for two reasons: to allowing successors to be part of a lineage and to give the deceased a "post-mortem future."

"The generational continuity is even more necessary today for children because couples are more fragile," says Martine Segalen, an experienced French ethnology professor at the Paris West University Nanterre La Défense. "This continuity used to be done through the transmission of a legacy. We now pass on memories."

Mankind is the only animal that buries its dead. It created graves in the hope for eternity and to extend the participation of its deceased into community life. "Traditionally, cemeteries served as a place for remembrance in public," Roberge says. "Now we have virtual graves."

Advance planning

Facebook gives users the option to designate someone to manage their profiles in the event of death, at which point profiles can become like commemorations. With Google, users can designate "trustworthy contacts," who are able to access all or some of our data after we die. But these decisions are self-interested. They firstly aim to prevent disputes, but they also have a financial dimension. On Facebook, unlike an inactive account, a memorial brings in people, traffic that can then be monetized with advertising.

"Without precise regulations, Internet users won't be able to prevent certain websites from making money off the data of deceased people," says Stéphan Denoyes, an attorney specializing in online law.

Paul-Olivier Gibert, the head of the French Association of Correspondents for the Protection of Personal Data, agrees. "The more time passes, the more deceased people will leave behind them digital footprints and the more this data will pose problems," he says.

For now, French legislation doesn't anticipate anything for the postmortem future of personal data. "Personal data isn't a possession, but a reflection of personality, to which rights of personality are attached," says Paul Hébert, deputy head of compliance at the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty. "These rights to personality thus disappear with death."

In their terms and conditions, some websites provide the process for successors to follow. For instance, at the private document archiving service e-Coffrefort, only the attorney in charge of the legacy can access the content. For many other sites, the decision of a judge is required. "In many cases, the beneficiaries have great difficulty in retrieving the data of the deceased person and can legally not assert their rights," says Axelle Lemaire, French Minister for Digital Affairs.

The goal of her "draft bill for a digital Republic" is for "every person to be able to define instructions regarding the conservation and communication of their personal data after their death." But some websites are hostile to this idea. "It's a topic that no one anticipated to this extent and will require a lot of time to consider," one legal director warns.

In any case, if it sees the light of day, the measure should be popular among Internet users. "In every culture, there is the desire to pass on a special aspect of oneself," explains Christian Bromberger, an ethnologist from the University of Aix-Marseille.

It used to be that only great politicians, artists and intellectuals were able to leave a trace. Soon maybe, it will be possible for anyone.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Taliban Redux, Cleaned-Up Image Can't Mask Their Cruel Reality

Twenty years later the Islamist group is back in power in Afghanistan, but trying this time to win international support. Now that several months have passed, experts on the ground can offer a clear assessment if the group has genuinely transformed on such issues as women's rights and free speech.

The Taliban have now been in power for almost five months

Atal Ahmadzai and Faten Ghosn

The international community is closely monitoring the Taliban, after the group re-seized power in Afghanistan in August 2021.

There is legitimate reason for concern. The Taliban are again ruling through fear and draconian rules.

The Taliban’s last regime, in the mid-1990s, was marked by human rights violations, including massacres, mass detentions and rape. The regime collapsed on Nov. 14, 2001, shortly after the U.S. launched its global war on terrorism.

Even after the Taliban officially fell from power, their subsequent two decades of insurgency produced various gross human rights violations, an encompassing term under international human rights law.

Keep reading... Show less
Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ