When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

German Austerity v. Europe's Luxury Lobby

Is the European economic paradox such that the luxury sector is the best hope for relaunching the moribund economy?

German Austerity v. Europe's Luxury Lobby

By Florian Eder
DIE WELT/Worldcrunch

BERLIN - Whether it's France's President travelling by train, or Italy's top tailors predicting more tough times ahead for their sector – the European paradigm right now, voluntary or imposed, is German austerity.

European luxury brands are increasingly worried that they are about to be crushed by said paradigm. In times like these people think it is inappropriate to spoil themselves, and politicians have so much else on their plate that they have little inclination to listen to the needs and worries of companies that earn a living making beautiful, expensive things.

Yet according to Armando Branchini, head of the European Cultural and Creative Industries Alliance (ECCIA): "By 2020, our sector will have contributed 900 billion euros to the European economy and employ up to 2.2 million people – assuming we have the right framework for growth."

The luxury sector is insisting that the added value factor it brings to Europe should be recognized but also appreciated. A recent study conducted for ECCIA by consulting firm Frontier Economics concurs: "It's easy to overlook the importance of the sector to Europe's economy."

Luxury labels are hoping the results of their study will deliver as much solace to an embattled Europe as their stylish accessories, yachts and sports cars, deliver pleasure to their buyers. The turnover today is, after all, 440 billion euros and half million jobs. The sector grows every year; the projected rate for next year is of 7% to 9%.

The study also points out that the luxury sector does a lot for Europe's image. Whether it is footwear or clothes, wine or watches, anybody who wants the best will buy from European brands, which account for 70% of the world luxury goods market.

A luxury wish list

ECCIA also uses the study to make four key demands -- and its authors have come up with dire scenarios for Europe, were these demands not met.

The first demand is for the removal of various constraints the sector presently faces when dealing with developing countries such as India, China or Brazil. The second demand concerns alcohol – producers of fine spirits consider themselves to be part of the luxury sector. Conditions for the sale of alcohol are expected to get tougher, which would mean a 20% decrease in turnover and 190,000 jobs lost. The third demand is for better protection from counterfeit goods: if nothing is done, a further 180,000 jobs will be lost.

The fourth demand is one that is shared by just about everybody in the manufacturing world: cheaper labor. Even though, the study says, part of the magic of European-made luxury goods lies in the high levels of skill and traditional craftsmanship they represent, these skills must cost less. If costs rise by another 10%, another 27,000 jobs could be at risk.

The study made an immediate impact on at least one decision-maker: after its presentation the Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for Industry and Entrepreneurship, Antonio Tajani – who like many high-end labels is Italian – stated that he would launch a relevant initiative "by the end of this year."

Read the article in German in Die Welt.

Photo- stilettobootlover

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Economy

How SVB Is Different Than Lehman — And Not Different Enough

The fall of Silicon Valley Bank revives memories of Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy. The two situations have some fundamental differences, but there is enough in common that the risks that SVB could spark a new global financial crisis is very real.

Photo of a person in front of a Silicon Valley Bank

A Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) branch office in Pasadena, California

Jean-Marc Vittori

-Analysis-

PARIS — In finance, brands can be the omens of disaster. On Monday, April 2, 2007, New Century Financial collapsed. The fall of this "financial institution of the new century," which had failed to properly assess risks, was the true starting point of the great financial crisis that culminated 18 months later with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.

On Friday, March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was shut down by U.S. authorities following the largest bank run in history. Its clients wanted to withdraw $42 billion in a single day.

The closure of the Silicon Valley bank was a result of disastrous management, but also from its central role in a start-up ecosystem that's been weakened by a scarcity of money.

The key question is: Is this closure the starting point of a new crisis?

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest