When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

German Austerity v. Europe's Luxury Lobby

Is the European economic paradox such that the luxury sector is the best hope for relaunching the moribund economy?

German Austerity v. Europe's Luxury Lobby

By Florian Eder
DIE WELT/Worldcrunch

BERLIN - Whether it's France's President travelling by train, or Italy's top tailors predicting more tough times ahead for their sector – the European paradigm right now, voluntary or imposed, is German austerity.

European luxury brands are increasingly worried that they are about to be crushed by said paradigm. In times like these people think it is inappropriate to spoil themselves, and politicians have so much else on their plate that they have little inclination to listen to the needs and worries of companies that earn a living making beautiful, expensive things.

Yet according to Armando Branchini, head of the European Cultural and Creative Industries Alliance (ECCIA): "By 2020, our sector will have contributed 900 billion euros to the European economy and employ up to 2.2 million people – assuming we have the right framework for growth."

The luxury sector is insisting that the added value factor it brings to Europe should be recognized but also appreciated. A recent study conducted for ECCIA by consulting firm Frontier Economics concurs: "It's easy to overlook the importance of the sector to Europe's economy."

Luxury labels are hoping the results of their study will deliver as much solace to an embattled Europe as their stylish accessories, yachts and sports cars, deliver pleasure to their buyers. The turnover today is, after all, 440 billion euros and half million jobs. The sector grows every year; the projected rate for next year is of 7% to 9%.

The study also points out that the luxury sector does a lot for Europe's image. Whether it is footwear or clothes, wine or watches, anybody who wants the best will buy from European brands, which account for 70% of the world luxury goods market.

A luxury wish list

ECCIA also uses the study to make four key demands -- and its authors have come up with dire scenarios for Europe, were these demands not met.

The first demand is for the removal of various constraints the sector presently faces when dealing with developing countries such as India, China or Brazil. The second demand concerns alcohol – producers of fine spirits consider themselves to be part of the luxury sector. Conditions for the sale of alcohol are expected to get tougher, which would mean a 20% decrease in turnover and 190,000 jobs lost. The third demand is for better protection from counterfeit goods: if nothing is done, a further 180,000 jobs will be lost.

The fourth demand is one that is shared by just about everybody in the manufacturing world: cheaper labor. Even though, the study says, part of the magic of European-made luxury goods lies in the high levels of skill and traditional craftsmanship they represent, these skills must cost less. If costs rise by another 10%, another 27,000 jobs could be at risk.

The study made an immediate impact on at least one decision-maker: after its presentation the Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for Industry and Entrepreneurship, Antonio Tajani – who like many high-end labels is Italian – stated that he would launch a relevant initiative "by the end of this year."

Read the article in German in Die Welt.

Photo- stilettobootlover

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

Mahsa Amini, Martyr Of An Iranian Regime Designed To Abuse Women

The 22-year-old is believed to have been beaten to death at a Tehran police station last week after "morality police" had reprimanded her clothing. The case has sparked the nation's outrage. But as ordinary Iranians testify, such beatings, torture and a home brand of misogyny are hallmarks of the 40-year Islamic Republic of Iran.

Mahsa Amini

Firouzeh Nordstrom

-Analysis-

TEHRAN — The death in Iran of a 22-year-old Mahsa Amini — after she was arrested by the so-called "morality police" — has unleashed another wave of protests, as thousands of Iranians vent their fury against an intrusive and violent regime. Indeed, as tragically exceptional as the circumstances appear, the reaction reflects the daily reality of abuse by authorities, especially directed toward women

Amini, a Kurdish-Iranian girl visiting Tehran with relatives, was detained by the regime's morality patrols on Sept. 13, apparently for not respecting the Islamic dress code that includes proper use of the hijab headscarf. Amini was declared dead two or three days after being taken into custody. Officials say she fainted and died, and blamed a preexisting heart condition. But neither her family nor anyone else in Iran believe that, as can be seen in the mounting protests that have now left at least three dead.

For Amini's was hardly the first arbitrary arrest, or the first suspected death in custody under Iran's Islamic regime.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ