When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Society

Switching Off Street Lights? Not The Brightest Solution To Our Energy Crisis

Keeping the lights out at night may be a good measure both for the environment and in the context of an energy crisis – but it may have repercussions on people's sense of security, in particular for women.

Photo of a woman walking past a street lamp at night

Ushering in a new dark age?

Irene Caselli

As the leaves fall and an energy crisis looms, countries across Europe are preparing for a winter that will be dark, figuratively and literally.

After deciding to switch to cold showers in public buildings, Germany is now turning off street lights at night. Since Sept. 1, the Energy Saving Ordinance has officially prohibited the illumination of public buildings, including landmarks, from the outside.

Others are following suit: In Paris, the Eiffel Tower will see its lights dimmed an hour earlier than usual starting this week, while some 12,000 towns around the country have fully or partially switched off public lighting at night. Spain requires shops and monuments to dim the lights and shut down at 10 p.m. sharp.


In Italy, even glitzy luxury brand Valentino has decided to shut down the lights to its shops early.

Obvious benefits, but ...

But this week, we also heard a different voice from the dark: Monica Lucarelli, city councilor for equal opportunities in Rome said the Italian capital city would not shut down lighting, because of the danger it could pose for women. “The last thing we need to do to combat violence against women is to turn off the city,” Lucarelli said, adding that street lighting accounts for a tiny proportion of consumption.

Still, keeping the lights out at night could help reduce air pollution and emissions that contribute to climate change, according to the International Dark-Sky Association, a U.S.-based non-profit. They estimate that about one-third of all outdoor night lighting has no benefit and that by turning lights off over $3 billion could be saved every year in the U.S. alone.

Reducing public lighting, the Dark-Sky advocates believe, would be beneficial for people’s health, as artificial light reduces the melatonin hormone, and is linked to sleeplessness, obesity and, in some cases, depression. Plants and animals would also benefit.

Photo of a street in Lodz by night

Lodz, Poland, by night

Kamil Porembinski

Sucking the fun out of night life

However you may view them now, street lights have long been seen as an important symbol of progress. Way before electricity, oil lamps were used in Rome for security to avoid tripping or keep robbers at bay. The rich in Rome had a slave, the lanternarius, who was responsible for lighting the lamps. In the Middle Ages, there were “link boys” who escorted people through the dark alleys of medieval towns holding a torch light.

Even if there is no clear proof that street lights have an effect on crime, brighter levels of light do make people feel safer when walking at night. And night life is supposed to be fun and upbeat — as opposed to scary and depressing empty streets.

Yes, the war in Ukraine and climate change should force us to look twice at everything that requires energy. But shutting off public lighting looks more like sliding back to the dark age than a sign of progress.


You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Russia

Here Are Four Ways Putin Could Turn The Tide In Ukraine

Ukraine's recent successes on the battlefield have put pressure on Vladimir Putin, who has launched what appear to be desperate attacks on civilians and infrastructure in response. Experts warn that it is dangerous to believe that Russia is bound to fail.

Major steps forward and victory are still not completely out of the picture for Russia

Christoph B. Schiltz

-Analysis-

Russia's airstrikes on Ukraine have continued unabated throughout the week.

More than 40 cities have been hit by Russian missiles over a period of just 24 hours, the General Staff of the Ukrainian army announced Thursday. Heavy strikes occurred in the outskirts of Kyiv for several nights in a row. Sirens wailed, people ran in panic through the darkness.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

Thirty percent of the country's energy infrastructure has now been destroyed, according to Ukrainian figures — a dramatic development as rain and cold weather are just around the corner.

Ukraine needs to urgently "defend itself against the terrible Russian attacks on civilians," NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg told the alliance's defense ministers meeting in Brussels earlier this week. The message got through.

Germany and the U.S. made new commitments to supply air defense, and a total of 15 countries signed a declaration of intent for a "European Sky Shield" in Brussels on Thursday. The goal is to "close the gaps" in air defense, said Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht.

But to be clear, as brutal as they are, the Russian missile offensives are the direct result of Ukraine's huge military gains in recent weeks.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ